ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03446885

Efficacy of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Promoting Occupational Success in Young Adults With ADHD

NCT03446885, Phase 4, Completed, Gregory Fabiano; results first posted 2021-06-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Promoting Occupational Success in Young Adults With ADHD. Trials, record NCT03446885. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03446885

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Promoting Occupational Success in Young Adults With ADHD
NCT number
NCT03446885
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
22 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Gregory Fabiano
Conditions
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity
Interventions
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate 40 MG, Placebo
First posted
2018-02-27
Last updated
2021-06-24
Results first posted
2021-06-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryRatings of Job Application Qualityduring interventional study session, 1 day in duration
Three independent coders will review each de-identified application. Following the review of the application, coders will complete a rating form that asks them to make an overall evaluation regarding whether the person was an acceptable job candidate for an interview using a scale of 1 ("definitely not") to 5 ("definitely"). Average rating across coders will be used as the dependent measure.
PrimaryRatings of Job Interview Performanceduring interventional study session, 1 day in duration
Three coders who are unaware of the study participant identities or group status will view the job interview videotape and completed a form. Raters will provide a rating of their overall impression of the interview behavior ranging from a score of one (Poor) to four (Outstanding). The average score of the coders will be utilized as a dependent measure.
PrimaryObjective Observation of Workplace Productivityduring interventional study session, 1 day in duration
The dependent measures from this aspect of the study are the number of items completed correctly out of the total number of assigned items (i.e., 225). Thus, the score reflects the percentage of items correctly completed out of the 225 assigned and scores could range from 0-100.
PrimaryInattentive/Overactive Ratingduring interventional study session, 1 day in duration
In addition to ratings of the interview performance, the rater also will complete the five-item inattentive/overactive (I/O) factor of the Iowa Conners rating scale (Atkins, Pelham, \& Licht, 1989; Loney \& Milich, 1982; Pelham, Milich, Murphy, \& Murphy, 1989). The five items are rated on a scale of Not at all (0) to Very Much (3) and the sum of these items represents the score. The dependent measure will be the score averaged across raters. Scores can range from 0-3 on each item, and the average score of the 5 items was used. Higher scores reflect greater inattentive/overactivity-related behaviors.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYRatings of Job Application Qualityduring interventional study session, 1 day in durationscore on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYRatings of Job Interview Performanceduring interventional study session, 1 day in durationscore on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYObjective Observation of Workplace Productivityduring interventional study session, 1 day in durationscore on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYInattentive/Overactive Ratingduring interventional study session, 1 day in durationscore on a scaleMEAN

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Ratings of Job Application QualityPlacebo3.40Standard Deviation 1.03score on a scale
Ratings of Job Application QualityVyvanse3.56Standard Deviation 1.00score on a scale
Ratings of Job Interview PerformancePlacebo3.17Standard Deviation .76score on a scale
Ratings of Job Interview PerformanceVyvanse3.33Standard Deviation .91score on a scale
Objective Observation of Workplace ProductivityPlacebo65.60Standard Deviation 17.55score on a scale
Objective Observation of Workplace ProductivityVyvanse68.45Standard Deviation 15.60score on a scale
Inattentive/Overactive RatingPlacebo2.13Standard Deviation 1.33score on a scale
Inattentive/Overactive RatingVyvanse2.01Standard Deviation 1.28score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAllocated to Vyvanse First12
Overall StudySTARTEDAllocated to Placebo First10
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAllocated to Vyvanse First10
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAllocated to Placebo First10
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAllocated to Vyvanse First2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAllocated to Placebo First0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo020
Total, all-cause mortalityVyvanse020
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo020
Total, other adverse eventsVyvanse020
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo020
Total, serious adverse eventsVyvanse020

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
32297783DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Vyvanse vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Vyvanse vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03446885

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03446885/registered