ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03463915

Clinical Trial Comparing Two Bladder Instillations for IC/BPS

NCT03463915, Phase 3, Completed, Olivia Cardenas-Trowers, M.D.; results first posted 2021-09-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Clinical Trial Comparing Two Bladder Instillations for IC/BPS. Trials, record NCT03463915. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03463915

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Clinical Trial Comparing Two Bladder Instillations for IC/BPS
NCT number
NCT03463915
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
90 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Olivia Cardenas-Trowers, M.D.
Conditions
Interstitial Cystitis, Bladder Pain Syndrome
Interventions
Bladder instillation WITH triamcinolone acetonide, Bladder instillation WITHOUT triamcinolone acetonide
First posted
2018-03-13
Last updated
2021-09-01
Results first posted
2021-09-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Total Score on the O'Leary-Sant QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedTotal scores range: 0-36 (0= no symptoms to 36= the most severe symptoms)
SecondaryPelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedTotal scores range: 0-35 (0= no symptoms to 35= the most severe symptoms)
SecondaryOveractive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedTotal scores range: 0-100 (higher scores on the symptom-severity scale suggestive of greater severity of symptoms and higher scores on the quality-of-life scale suggestive of better quality of life)
SecondaryPelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reported20 question self-administered questionnaire on the presence and absence of pelvic floor symptoms. Score ranges from 0 (least distress) to 300 (most distress).
SecondarySexual Function Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reported
Measures sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders. Queries about arousal, orgasm, partner-related issues, sexual quality, and desire. The tool also takes into account those who are not sexually active. The questionnaire was used in the study solely to determine if patients had improved dyspareunia (as a categorical variable).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for PainAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedVAS is measured on marking on a 10-centimeter (cm) ruler (measured in cm, 0= no pain and 10= most severe pain possible)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventEnd of study (6 weeks)Adverse events will only be those determined to be related to the study drug

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Total Score on the O'Leary-Sant QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedscores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYOveractive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSexual Function Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for PainAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventEnd of study (6 weeks)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Total Score on the O'Leary-Sant QuestionnaireBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide-6.7Standard Deviation 7.1scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Total Score on the O'Leary-Sant QuestionnaireBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide-5.8Standard Deviation 8.0scores on a scale
Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) QuestionnaireBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide-5.3Standard Deviation 5.1score on a scale
Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) QuestionnaireBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide-2.7Standard Deviation 5.5score on a scale
Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide-24.2Standard Deviation 19.1score on a scale
Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide-18.8Standard Deviation 24.6score on a scale
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide-5.3Standard Deviation 9.5score on a scale
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide-6.4Standard Deviation 9.7score on a scale
Sexual Function Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) QuestionnaireBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide4participants
Sexual Function Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) QuestionnaireBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide4participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide45
Overall StudySTARTEDBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide45
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide35
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide36
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide10
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide9

Adverse events8

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUrethral painRenal and urinary disordersBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide2452
otherUrethral painRenal and urinary disordersBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide1451
otherUrinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disordersBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide1451
otherUrinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disordersBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide0450
otherAnxiety attackPsychiatric disordersBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide1451
otherAnxiety attackPsychiatric disordersBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide0450
otherStrong bladder spasmsRenal and urinary disordersBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide1451
otherStrong bladder spasmsRenal and urinary disordersBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide0450

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide045
Total, all-cause mortalityBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide045
Total, other adverse eventsBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide545
Total, other adverse eventsBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide145
Total, serious adverse eventsBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide045
Total, serious adverse eventsBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide045

Papers15

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
9146002BACKGROUNDPubMed
9201654BACKGROUNDPubMed
11346323BACKGROUNDPubMed
15049588BACKGROUNDPubMed
15592041BACKGROUNDPubMed
15711286BACKGROUNDPubMed
17943887BACKGROUNDPubMed
19364425BACKGROUNDPubMed
22786518BACKGROUNDPubMed
23234637BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 15

See all 15 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide vs Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide: Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventTrial comparisons
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide vs Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide: Sexual Function Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) Questionnaire
Trial comparisons
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide vs Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide vs Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03463915

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03463915/registered