ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03469349

Actovegin 12-Week Treatment Given First Intravenously and Subsequently Orally in Participants With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease Fontaine Stage IIB

NCT03469349, Phase 3, Completed, Takeda; results first posted 2020-10-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Actovegin 12-Week Treatment Given First Intravenously and Subsequently Orally in Participants With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease Fontaine Stage IIB. Trials, record NCT03469349. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03469349

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Actovegin 12-Week Treatment Given First Intravenously and Subsequently Orally in Participants With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease Fontaine Stage IIB
NCT number
NCT03469349
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
366 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Takeda
Conditions
Peripheral Arterial Diseases
Interventions
Actovegin, Placebo
First posted
2018-03-19
Last updated
2020-10-28
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2017-004741-24
Results first posted
2020-10-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) at Week 12Baseline up to Week 12
ICD was the distance walked at the onset of claudication pain or pain-free walking distance. ICD was assessed using treadmill testing. A fixed load treadmill test was carried out at 3.0 kilometer per hour (km/h) with a 10 percent (%) grade.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in ICD at Weeks 2 and 24Baseline up to Weeks 2 and 24
ICD was the distance walked at the onset of claudication pain or pain-free walking distance. ICD was assessed using treadmill testing. A fixed load treadmill test was carried out at 3.0 km/h with a 10% grade.
SecondaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) at Weeks 2, 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 2, 12 and 24
ACD was the distance at which claudication pain becomes so severe that the participant was forced to stop, also known as maximal walking distance. ACD was assessed using treadmill testing. A fixed load treadmill test was carried out at 3.0 km/h with a 10% grade. The investigator will record the distance from walking start to the point where the participant is unable to walk anymore.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Rest Pain at Weeks 12 and 24Weeks 12 and 24Rest pain was defined as a continuous burning pain, that begins, or is aggravated, after reclining or elevating the limb and is relieved by sitting or standing.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Revascularization Procedures at Week 24Week 24
Revascularization was defined by a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score of 2 or 3 following use of the Penumbra System. TIMI scores were used to describe blood flow at the treated vessel with 0 designating no flow and 3 for normal flow.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
The SF-36 was a questionnaire that evaluated a participant's health related quality of life. SF-36 included 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical health score was generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental health score was generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change From Baseline in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) at Week 12Baseline up to Week 12
The full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary endpoint. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in ICD at Weeks 2 and 24Baseline up to Weeks 2 and 24
The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary endpoint. Participants evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.
percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change From Baseline in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) at Weeks 2, 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 2, 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary endpoint. Participants evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.
meterMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Rest Pain at Weeks 12 and 24Weeks 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary endpoint. Participants evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Revascularization Procedures at Week 24Week 24The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary endpoint.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary endpoint. Participants evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.
points on a scaleMEAN

Results by group32

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change From Baseline in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) at Week 12Placebo21.99Standard Error 9.286percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) at Week 12Actovegin 1200 mg51.17Standard Error 9.187percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in ICD at Weeks 2 and 24PlaceboWeek 26.58Standard Error 8.131percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in ICD at Weeks 2 and 24Actovegin 1200 mgWeek 222.45Standard Error 7.981percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in ICD at Weeks 2 and 24PlaceboWeek 2425.12Standard Error 10.665percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in ICD at Weeks 2 and 24Actovegin 1200 mgWeek 2460.63Standard Error 10.614percent change
Absolute Change From Baseline in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) at Weeks 2, 12 and 24PlaceboBaseline134.5Standard Deviation 58.84meter
Absolute Change From Baseline in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) at Weeks 2, 12 and 24Actovegin 1200 mgBaseline137.1Standard Deviation 72.76meter
Absolute Change From Baseline in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) at Weeks 2, 12 and 24PlaceboChange at Week 217.61Standard Deviation 30.781meter
Absolute Change From Baseline in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) at Weeks 2, 12 and 24Actovegin 1200 mgChange at Week 246.28Standard Deviation 179.356meter

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo182
Overall StudySTARTEDActovegin 1200 mg184
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo177
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDActovegin 1200 mg174
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDActovegin 1200 mg10

Adverse events88

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo1182
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersActovegin 1200 mg0184
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersPlacebo0182
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersActovegin 1200 mg1184
otherCarbohydrate metabolism disorderCongenital, familial and genetic disordersPlacebo0182
otherCarbohydrate metabolism disorderCongenital, familial and genetic disordersActovegin 1200 mg1184
otherPainGeneral disordersPlacebo0182
otherPainGeneral disordersActovegin 1200 mg1184
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo5182
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsActovegin 1200 mg5184

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0182
Total, all-cause mortalityActovegin 1200 mg0184
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo20182
Total, other adverse eventsActovegin 1200 mg23184
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo3182
Total, serious adverse eventsActovegin 1200 mg9184

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Actovegin 1200 mg vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Actovegin 1200 mg vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03469349

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03469349/results?page=2