ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03512262

Safety and Efficacy of Abaloparatide-SC in Men With Osteoporosis (ATOM)

NCT03512262, Phase 3, Completed, Radius Health, Inc.; results first posted 2023-04-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of Abaloparatide-SC in Men With Osteoporosis (ATOM). Trials, record NCT03512262. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03512262

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of Abaloparatide-SC in Men With Osteoporosis (ATOM)
NCT number
NCT03512262
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
228 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Radius Health, Inc.
Conditions
Osteoporosis, Osteoporosis, Age-Related, Osteoporosis Localized to Spine, Age Related Osteoporosis, Osteoporosis Senile, Osteoporosis of Vertebrae
Interventions
Abaloparatide, Placebo
First posted
2018-04-30
Last updated
2023-04-07
Results first posted
2023-04-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Lumbar Spine BMD was assessed by DXA scans evaluated by a central imaging laboratory. Lumbar spine scans included L1 through L4. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement in bone health.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Total hip BMD was assessed by DXA scans evaluated by a central imaging laboratory. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement in bone health.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Femoral neck BMD was assessed by DXA scans evaluated by a central imaging laboratory. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement in bone health.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Lumbar Spine BMD was assessed by DXA scans evaluated by a central imaging laboratory. Lumbar spine scans included L1 through L4. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement in bone health.
SecondaryPercent Change in Total Hip BMD From Baseline at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Total hip BMD was assessed by DXA scans evaluated by a central imaging laboratory. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement in bone health.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Femoral neck BMD was assessed by DXA scans evaluated by a central imaging laboratory. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement in bone health.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Ultra-Distal Radius BMD at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Ultra-distal radius BMD was assessed by DXA scans. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement in bone health.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Distal One-third Radius BMD at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Distal one-third radius BMD was assessed by DXA scans. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement in bone health.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type I N-terminal Propeptide (s-PINP) at Month 12Baseline, Month 12
Blood samples were taken to measure s-PINP, a bone formation marker. s-PINP concentrations reflect the rate of skeletal new bone formation. Increases in s-PINP indicate anabolic biologic response in the bone.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Blood samples were taken to measure s-CTX. Elevated levels of s-CTX indicate increased bone resorption (bone loss).

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: All participants randomized into the study. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 12Baseline, Month 12ITT Population: All participants randomized into the study. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 12Baseline, Month 12ITT Population: All participants randomized into the study. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6Baseline, Month 6ITT Population: All participants randomized into the study. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Total Hip BMD From Baseline at Month 6Baseline, Month 6ITT Population: All participants randomized into the study. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 6Baseline, Month 6ITT Population: All participants randomized into the study. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Ultra-Distal Radius BMD at Month 12Baseline, Month 12ITT Population: All participants randomized into the study. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Distal One-third Radius BMD at Month 12Baseline, Month 12ITT Population: All participants randomized into the study. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type I N-terminal Propeptide (s-PINP) at Month 12Baseline, Month 12ITT Population: All participants randomized into the study. Here, overall number of participants analyzed is the total number of participants who had s-PINP evaluation at Baseline and Month 12.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) at Month 12Baseline, Month 12ITT Population: All participants randomized into the study. Here, overall number of participants analyzed is the total number of participants who had s-CTX evaluation at Baseline and Month 12.percent changeMEAN

Results by group38

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12Abaloparatide8.4820Standard Error 0.5353percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12Placebo1.1654Standard Error 0.7235percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 12Abaloparatide2.1351Standard Error 0.2711percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 12Placebo0.0143Standard Error 0.3543percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 12Abaloparatide2.9766Standard Error 0.3448percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 12Placebo0.1545Standard Error 0.4527percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6Abaloparatide5.5436Standard Error 0.4127percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6Placebo0.6418Standard Error 0.5472percent change
Percent Change in Total Hip BMD From Baseline at Month 6Abaloparatide1.3888Standard Error 0.2142percent change
Percent Change in Total Hip BMD From Baseline at Month 6Placebo0.0267Standard Error 0.2790percent change

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAbaloparatide149
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo79
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugAbaloparatide149
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugPlacebo79
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAbaloparatide114
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo64
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAbaloparatide35
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo15

Adverse events54

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInjection site erythemaGeneral disordersAbaloparatide19149
otherInjection site erythemaGeneral disordersPlacebo479
otherInjection site swellingGeneral disordersAbaloparatide10149
otherInjection site swellingGeneral disordersPlacebo079
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersAbaloparatide9149
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersPlacebo079
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsAbaloparatide13149
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo679
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsAbaloparatide8149
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo179

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAbaloparatide1149
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo079
Total, other adverse eventsAbaloparatide73149
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo2979
Total, serious adverse eventsAbaloparatide8149
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo479

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
8119233BACKGROUNDPubMed
10564229BACKGROUNDPubMed
11241160BACKGROUNDPubMed
41812602DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Abaloparatide vs Placebo: Number of Participants With New Clinical FracturesTrial comparisons
Abaloparatide vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Abaloparatide vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03512262

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03512262/results?page=2