ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03512275

A Study of Bermekimab in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

NCT03512275, Phase 2, Completed, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; results first posted 2022-03-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Bermekimab in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa. Trials, record NCT03512275. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03512275

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Bermekimab in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa
NCT number
NCT03512275
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
42 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Conditions
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Interventions
Bermekimab Monoclonal Antibody 400 mg
First posted
2018-04-30
Last updated
2022-03-14
Results first posted
2022-03-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsUp to Visit 14 (up to Day 93)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical or biological agent under study.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 12Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving HiSCR at Week 12 was reported. For this score participants were defined as achievers or non-achievers. The positive HiSCR score was defined as a greater than or equal to (\>=) 50% reduction in inflammatory lesion AN count (sum of abscesses and inflammatory nodules), and no increase in abscesses or draining fistulas in hidradenitis suppurativa compared with the lesions counted on visit 1 (baseline).
SecondaryPlasma Concentration of BermekimabPredose at Days 14 (Visit 3), 28 (Visit 5), 56 (Visit 9), 84 (Visit 13)
An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed to specifically measure bermekimab levels in human plasma. The blood samples were collected at each pharmacokinetic (PK) collection time point for PK analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score for DiseaseBaseline and Week 12
Change from baseline in VAS score for disease was reported. The VAS is a validated, subjective measure for participants disease impression. Disease impression scores were recorded using a similar scale, with 0 representing "not at all severe" and 10 representing "extremely severe".
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in VAS Score for PainBaseline and Week 12
Change from baseline in VAS score for pain was reported. The VAS is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Pain scores were recorded by marking a number on a scale from 0 to 10, 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "extremely painful".
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ScoreBaseline and Week 12
The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the impact of disease symptoms and treatment on Quality of life (QOL). The format is a simple response (0 to 3 where 0 is "not at all" and 3 is "very much") to 10 questions, which assess QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring system of 0 to 30; a high score is indicative of a poor QOL.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ScoreBaseline and Week 12
PGA is a physician's assessment of the severity of disease based on a 6-point scale (Clear \[0\], minimal \[1\], mild \[2\], moderate \[3\], severe \[4\], more severe \[5\]) ranging from 0-5. Higher score indicated more severity of disease.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
The DAS is the sum of scores of all affected areas of each participant. Each area was evaluated by the following formula: (the sum of the two largest diameters in each affected area in millimeter \[mm\]) \* (Total number of lesions in the anatomic area multiplied by the degree of inflammation of each lesion on a scale of 0 to 3). A minimum score of 0 and there is no maximum score range. Higher scores indicate more disease activity.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Modified Sartorius Score (mSS)Baseline and Week 12
mSS is used to quantify severity of HS. Points are awarded for 12 body areas (left-right axillae, left - right sub/inframammary areas, intermammary area, left - right buttocks, left-right inguinocrural folds, perianal area, perineal area and other): points were awarded for nodules (2 points each);abscesses (4points);fistulas (4points);scars (1point); other findings (1 point); and longest distance between two lesions (no active lesion or only 1 lesion equal to \[=\]0 points, less than \[\<\]5cm=2points, 5-10cm=4points, greater than \[\>\]10cm 6points) and if lesions are separated by normal skin (yes-0 points; no-6points). Total mSS is sum of the 12 regional scores. Change from baseline in mSS was not reported as the electronic data capture (EDC) system erroneously requested data for this endpoint to be input in centimeters versus millimeters and conversion was not possible because it was given in ranges. Therefore, there was not enough valid data to sufficiently perform this endpoint analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Inflammatory Lesion (Abscesses and Inflammatory Nodules) CountBaseline and Week 12
Change from baseline to Week 12 in inflammatory lesion (abscesses and inflammatory nodules) count was reported. The sum of abscesses and inflammatory nodules was measured for each participant to assess change in inflammatory lesion counts.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsUp to Visit 14 (up to Day 93)The safety analysis set (SAF) consisted of all participants that received at least one dose of study medication and were analyzed as treated.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 12Week 12The safety analysis set (SAF) consisted of all participants that received at least one dose of study medication and were analyzed as treated.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPlasma Concentration of BermekimabPredose at Days 14 (Visit 3), 28 (Visit 5), 56 (Visit 9), 84 (Visit 13)
The safety analysis set (SAF) consisted of all participants that received at least one dose of study medication and were analyzed as treated. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is defined as participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score for DiseaseBaseline and Week 12The safety analysis set (SAF) consisted of all participants that received at least one dose of study medication and were analyzed as treated.Units on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in VAS Score for PainBaseline and Week 12The safety analysis set (SAF) consisted of all participants that received at least one dose of study medication and were analyzed as treated.Units on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ScoreBaseline and Week 12The safety analysis set (SAF) consisted of all participants that received at least one dose of study medication and were analyzed as treated.Units on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ScoreBaseline and Week 12The safety analysis set (SAF) consisted of all participants that received at least one dose of study medication and were analyzed as treated.Units on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The safety analysis set (SAF) consisted of all participants that received at least one dose of study medication and were analyzed as treated.Units on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Modified Sartorius Score (mSS)Baseline and Week 12
The safety analysis set (SAF) consisted of all participants that received at least one dose of study medication and were analyzed as treated. Data was not collected and analyzed for this outcome measure due to change in planned analysis.
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Inflammatory Lesion (Abscesses and Inflammatory Nodules) CountBaseline and Week 12The safety analysis set (SAF) consisted of all participants that received at least one dose of study medication and were analyzed as treated.Count of lesionsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)21Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)16Participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 12Group A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)62.5Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 12Group B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)61.1Percentage of Participants
Plasma Concentration of BermekimabGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)Visit 332.7Standard Deviation 18.3micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Plasma Concentration of BermekimabGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)Visit 336.7Standard Deviation 22.7micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Plasma Concentration of BermekimabGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)Visit 537.4Standard Deviation 20.7micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Plasma Concentration of BermekimabGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)Visit 542.2Standard Deviation 25.0micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Plasma Concentration of BermekimabGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)Visit 936.3Standard Deviation 20.9micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Plasma Concentration of BermekimabGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)Visit 948.0Standard Deviation 31.7micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)24
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)18
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)22
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)11
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)7

Adverse events38

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)024
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)118
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)024
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)218
otherToothacheGastrointestinal disordersGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)024
otherToothacheGastrointestinal disordersGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)118
otherFatigueGeneral disordersGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)024
otherFatigueGeneral disordersGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)118
otherInjection Site ErythemaGeneral disordersGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)224
otherInjection Site ErythemaGeneral disordersGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)018

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)024
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)018
Total, other adverse eventsGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)624
Total, other adverse eventsGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)818
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed)224
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive)018

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
32004568DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Group A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed) vs Group B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive): Number of Participants With Adverse EventsTrial comparisons
Group A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed) vs Group B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Group A: Bermekimab 400 Milligram (mg) (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [TNF] Failed) vs Group B: Bermekimab 400 mg (Anti-TNF Naive): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03512275

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03512275/results?page=2