ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03533114

A Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of JZP-258 in the Treatment of Idiopathic Hypersomnia (IH) With an Open-label Safety Extension

NCT03533114, Phase 3, Completed, Jazz Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2021-11-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of JZP-258 in the Treatment of Idiopathic Hypersomnia (IH) With an Open-label Safety Extension. Trials, record NCT03533114. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03533114

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of JZP-258 in the Treatment of Idiopathic Hypersomnia (IH) With an Open-label Safety Extension
NCT number
NCT03533114
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
154 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Idiopathic Hypersomnia
Interventions
JZP-258, Placebo Oral Solution
First posted
2018-05-22
Last updated
2021-11-24
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2018-001311-79
Results first posted
2021-11-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from the end of the Stable Dose Period to the end of the Double-blind Randomized Withdrawal Period (DBRW) (2 Weeks)
The ESS is a 8-item self reported questionnaire intended to measure daytime sleepiness. In this test, participants answer questions with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the 7 days prior to the assessment while performing eight common, non-stimulating activities. The ESS total score range is 1 to 24. Each activity is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from a minimum of "would never doze" to a maximum of "a high chance of dozing." Thus, the ESS scale range is as follows: 0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing; 0 indicates a better outcome, and 3 indicates a worse outcome. A positive mean change value indicates an increase in score from the end of the stable dose period and worsened daytime sleepiness. A higher ESS score (above 10) reflects a greater average sleep propensity in daily life (ASP) , or daytime sleepiness.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Reported as Worse on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc)At the end of the DBRW Period (2 Weeks)
The Patient Global Impression - Change (PGIc) scale was completed by the participant. The PGI-C scale rated the participant's condition at a specified time point on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The PGIc scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Worsened condition was defined as a PGIc rating of 5, 6, or 7.
SecondaryChange in Total Score on the Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale (IHSS)Change from the end of the Stable Dose Period to the end of the DBRW Period (2 Weeks)
The IHSS is a 14-item self-reported questionnaire assessing the severity of IH symptoms of excessive sleepiness, prolonged sleep duration, cognitive impairment and sleep inertia. Total scores can range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating a greater severity or frequency of symptoms.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Reported as Worse on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc)At the end of the DBRW Period (2 Weeks)
The CGIc scale is a 7-point Likert-type scale that rates the Investigator's impression of any change in the severity of the participant's condition at a specified time point. The participant was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The CGIc scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Worsened condition was defined as a CGIc rating of 5, 6, or 7.
SecondaryChange in Total Score on the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ-10)Change from the end of the Stable Dose Period to the end of the DBRW Period (2 Weeks)
The FOSQ-10 is a short version of the original FOSQ-30 instrument, which is a disease specific quality of life questionnaire to determine functional status in adults. Measures are designed to assess the impact of disorders of excessive sleepiness on multiple activities of everyday living and the extent to which these activities are improved by effective treatment. The questionnaire has a 4-point Likert response format (e.g., 1= extreme difficulty, 2= moderate difficulty, 3=a little difficulty, and 4 =no difficulty). FOSQ-10 total score is calculated by first taking the mean of the items for each subscale with more than 1 item completed and then taking the mean across the non-missing 5 subscales (General Productivity, Activity Level, Vigilance, Social Outcomes, Intimacy and Sexual Relationship) multiplied by 5. The score ranges from a minimum of 5 points to a maximum of 20 points, with higher scores indicating better functional status.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from the end of the Stable Dose Period to the end of the Double-blind Randomized Withdrawal Period (DBRW) (2 Weeks)
The Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) analysis set included all participants who were randomized to JZP258 or placebo, who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the DBRW and have had at least one set of post randomization assessments for ESS or IHSS, or a PGIc value at the end of the DBRW.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Reported as Worse on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc)At the end of the DBRW Period (2 Weeks)
The Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) analysis set included all participants who were randomized to JZP258 or placebo, who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the DBRW and have had at least one set of post randomization assessments for ESS or IHSS, or a PGIc value at the end of the DBRW.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Total Score on the Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale (IHSS)Change from the end of the Stable Dose Period to the end of the DBRW Period (2 Weeks)
The Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) analysis set included all participants who were randomized to JZP258 or placebo, who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the DBRW and have had at least one set of post randomization assessments for ESS or IHSS, or a PGIc value at the end of the DBRW.
score on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Reported as Worse on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc)At the end of the DBRW Period (2 Weeks)
The Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) analysis set included all participants who were randomized to JZP258 or placebo, who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the DBRW and have had at least one set of post randomization assessments for ESS or IHSS, or a PGIc value at the end of the DBRW.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Total Score on the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ-10)Change from the end of the Stable Dose Period to the end of the DBRW Period (2 Weeks)
The Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) analysis set included all participants who were randomized to JZP258 or placebo, who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the DBRW and have had at least one set of post randomization assessments for ESS or IHSS, or a PGIc value at the end of the DBRW. JZP-258 overall number was 54 and placebo group overall number was 56 as fewer participants were available for this particular assessment.
score on a scaleMEDIAN

Results by group10

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreJZP-2580.7Standard Deviation 3.22score on a scale
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScorePlacebo7.4Standard Deviation 5.16score on a scale
Percentage of Participants Reported as Worse on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc)JZP-25812participants
Percentage of Participants Reported as Worse on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc)Placebo52participants
Change in Total Score on the Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale (IHSS)JZP-2580.0Full Range -8 to 24score on a scale
Change in Total Score on the Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale (IHSS)Placebo14.0Full Range -2 to 38score on a scale
Percentage of Participants Reported as Worse on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc)JZP-25812participants
Percentage of Participants Reported as Worse on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc)Placebo52participants
Change in Total Score on the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ-10)JZP-258-0.08Full Range -8.5 to 4.5score on a scale
Change in Total Score on the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ-10)Placebo-4.17Full Range -12.5 to 1.3score on a scale

Participant flow34

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
OverallSTARTEDOn Baseline IH Medication88
OverallSTARTEDTreatment Naive66
OverallCOMPLETEDOn Baseline IH Medication57
OverallCOMPLETEDTreatment Naive38
OverallNOT COMPLETEDOn Baseline IH Medication31
OverallNOT COMPLETEDTreatment Naive28
Open Label Titration and OptimizationSTARTEDOn Baseline IH Medication88
Open Label Titration and OptimizationSTARTEDTreatment Naive66
Open Label Titration and OptimizationCOMPLETEDOn Baseline IH Medication72
Open Label Titration and OptimizationCOMPLETEDTreatment Naive53

Adverse events116

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersOn Baseline IH Medication118815
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Naive3664
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersJZP-0581215417
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo2592
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersOn Baseline IH Medication8888
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Naive2662
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersJZP-0581015410
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0590
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersOn Baseline IH Medication218831
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Naive136614

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOn Baseline IH Medication088
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment Naive066
Total, all-cause mortalityJZP-0580154
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo059
Total, other adverse eventsOn Baseline IH Medication6488
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment Naive3966
Total, other adverse eventsJZP-05897154
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1059
Total, serious adverse eventsOn Baseline IH Medication288
Total, serious adverse eventsTreatment Naive266

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
34942138DERIVEDPubMed
37409509DERIVEDPubMed
40135693DERIVEDPubMed
41442817DERIVEDPubMed
42382222DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
JZP-258 vs Placebo: Percentage of Participants Reported as Worse on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc)Trial comparisons
JZP-258 vs Placebo: Percentage of Participants Reported as Worse on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc)Trial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03533114

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03533114/flow?page=2