ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03544229

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-906 in Adult Participants With Symptomatic Idiopathic or Diabetic Gastroparesis

NCT03544229, Phase 2, Completed, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; results first posted 2022-11-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-906 in Adult Participants With Symptomatic Idiopathic or Diabetic Gastroparesis. Trials, record NCT03544229. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03544229

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-906 in Adult Participants With Symptomatic Idiopathic or Diabetic Gastroparesis
NCT number
NCT03544229
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
242 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conditions
Diabetic Gastroparesis, Idiopathic Gastroparesis
Interventions
TAK-906 Maleate, Placebo
First posted
2018-06-01
Last updated
2022-11-16
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2018-001275-21
Results first posted
2022-11-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary (ANMS GCSI-DD) Composite Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis. The ANMS GCSI-DD composite score included score of nausea, early satiety, upper abdominal pain, and postprandial fullness. The severity scores of these symptoms range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The daily composite score was calculated by summing the scores on the 4 symptom items (nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain) and then dividing by 4, that is the number of items within the composite score. Thus, the maximum daily composite score was (4 symptoms × maximum score 4 divided by 4) = 16/4 = 4. The ANMS GCSI-DD daily composite score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used for the analysis.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in ANMS GCSI-DD Composite Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis . The ANMS GCSI-DD composite score included score of nausea, early satiety, upper abdominal pain and postprandial fullness. The severity scores of these symptoms range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The daily composite score was calculated by summing the scores on the 4 symptom items (nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain) and then dividing by 4, that is the number of items within the composite score. Thus, the maximum daily composite score was (4 symptoms × maximum score 4 divided by 4) = 16/4 = 4. The ANMS GCSI-DD daily composite score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Nausea Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis. The ANMS GCSI-DD assesses nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain on a severity score calculated from a 5-point Likert scale. The ANMS GCSI-DD nausea symptom score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM was used for analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Early Satiety Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis. The ANMS GCSI-DD assesses nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain on a severity score calculated from a 5-point Likert scale. The ANMS GCSI-DD early satiety symptom score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Postprandial Fullness Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis. The ANMS GCSI-DD assesses nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain on a severity score calculated from a 5-point Likert scale. The ANMS GCSI-DD postprandial fullness symptom score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Upper Abdominal Pain Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis. The ANMS GCSI-DD assesses nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain on a severity score calculated from a 5-point Likert scale. The ANMS GCSI-DD upper abdominal pain symptom score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Recorded Vomiting Frequency at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
Vomiting frequency was collected as the number of times a participant vomited in a 24-hour period i.e., vomiting episodes using the ANMS GCSI-DD. The daily score was averaged over 7 days. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. MMRM was used for the analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Overall Severity of Gastroparesis Symptoms Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
The overall severity of gastroparesis symptoms is the participant report of the overall severity rating of their symptoms as entered daily in the ANMS GCSI-DD and at time of visit. Severity was rated on a 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) scale. Higher score values indicated more severe symptoms. MMRM was used for the analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCI-DD Bloating Severity Scale Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
The bloating severity scale was scored from 0 to 4 (where 0 = no symptom and 4 = severe symptom). The daily total score can range from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM was used for analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Total Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
Daily total score was calculated by summing scores on each of the 5 symptom items in ANMS GCSI-DD (nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, upper abdominal pain and vomiting) plus the bloating severity item and then dividing by 6. When calculating total score, vomiting frequency was scored from 0 to 4 (where 0=no vomiting and 4=four or more episodes of vomiting). The daily total score can range from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. MMRM was used for analyses.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary (ANMS GCSI-DD) Composite Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and have a baseline value and at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary efficacy.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in ANMS GCSI-DD Composite Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and have a baseline value and at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary efficacy.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Nausea Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and have a baseline value and at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Early Satiety Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and have a baseline value and at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Postprandial Fullness Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and have a baseline value and at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Upper Abdominal Pain Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and have a baseline value and at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Recorded Vomiting Frequency at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and have a baseline value and at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
vomiting episodes/dayLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Overall Severity of Gastroparesis Symptoms Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and have a baseline value and at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCI-DD Bloating Severity Scale Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and have a baseline value and at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Total Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and have a baseline value and at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group48

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary (ANMS GCSI-DD) Composite Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodPlacebo-1.19Standard Error 0.120score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary (ANMS GCSI-DD) Composite Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodTAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-1.11Standard Error 0.219score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary (ANMS GCSI-DD) Composite Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodTAK-906 Maleate 25 mg-1.17Standard Error 0.120score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary (ANMS GCSI-DD) Composite Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodTAK-906 Maleate 50 mg-1.21Standard Error 0.116score on a scale
Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in ANMS GCSI-DD Composite Score at Week 12Placebo42.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in ANMS GCSI-DD Composite Score at Week 12TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg39.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in ANMS GCSI-DD Composite Score at Week 12TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg47.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in ANMS GCSI-DD Composite Score at Week 12TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg41.9percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Nausea Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodPlacebo-1.42Standard Error 0.134score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Nausea Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodTAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-1.36Standard Error 0.245score on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo73
Overall StudySTARTEDTAK-906 Maleate 5 mg23
Overall StudySTARTEDTAK-906 Maleate 25 mg72
Overall StudySTARTEDTAK-906 Maleate 50 mg74
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo67
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTAK-906 Maleate 5 mg21
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTAK-906 Maleate 25 mg67
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTAK-906 Maleate 50 mg72
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo6
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTAK-906 Maleate 5 mg2

Adverse events36

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo073
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersTAK-906 5 mg023
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersTAK-906 25 mg472
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersTAK-906 50 mg074
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo073
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTAK-906 5 mg023
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTAK-906 25 mg072
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTAK-906 50 mg474
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo073
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsTAK-906 5 mg223

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo073
Total, all-cause mortalityTAK-906 5 mg023
Total, all-cause mortalityTAK-906 25 mg072
Total, all-cause mortalityTAK-906 50 mg074
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo073
Total, other adverse eventsTAK-906 5 mg223
Total, other adverse eventsTAK-906 25 mg472
Total, other adverse eventsTAK-906 50 mg474
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo273
Total, serious adverse eventsTAK-906 5 mg023

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
34967147DERIVEDPubMed
37533380DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03544229

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03544229/results?page=2