ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03560986

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Neridronic Acid in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)

NCT03560986, Phase 3, Terminated, Grünenthal GmbH; results first posted 2020-08-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Neridronic Acid in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). Trials, record NCT03560986. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03560986

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Neridronic Acid in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
NCT number
NCT03560986
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
267 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Grünenthal GmbH
Conditions
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
Interventions
Neridronic acid 100 mg, Placebo
First posted
2018-06-19
Last updated
2020-08-05
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2017-004244-37
Results first posted
2020-08-05
Limitations and caveats
A pre-specified interim analysis was conducted on pooled primary endpoint data of studies KF7013-04 and KF7013-02 (NCT03530345). The interim analysis indicated futility (neridronate unlikely to be superior to placebo) and both studies were stopped.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Pain Intensity Score (Weekly Average of Pain Values Recorded Daily in the Electronic Diary)From the Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) to Week 12
In the Baseline Phase and in Treatment Period A/Follow-up Period 1, participants were asked to assessed their average CRPS-related pain on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) - from 0 = "no pain" to 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine" and report it once daily (in the evening, 24-hour recall) in an electronic diary. Changes from baseline (average for the Baseline Phase) to the weekly average for Week 12 were calculated.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the Average Pain Intensity Recorded on the Tablet ComputerFrom baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 11 (Week 26)11-point NRS - from 0 = "no pain" to 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine" - reported at the visits on a tablet computer (24-hour recall). Changes from baseline to Week 26 were planned to be analyzed.
SecondaryPain Response to Treatment, Defined as at Least 30% Decrease From Baseline in the Average Pain Intensity at Week 12, Recorded on the Tablet ComputerFrom baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 8 (Week 12)
11-point NRS - from 0 = "no pain" to 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine" - reported at the visits on a tablet computer (24-hour recall). The number of participants with response at Week 12 was planned to be determined.
SecondaryPain Response to Treatment, Defined as at Least 30% Decrease From Baseline in the Average Pain Intensity at Week 26, Recorded on the Tablet ComputerFrom baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 11 (Week 26)
11-point NRS - from 0 = "no pain" to 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine" - reported at the visits on a tablet computer (24-hour recall). The number of participants with response at Week 26 was planned to be determined.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Pain Intensity Level of Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA)From baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 8 (Week 12)
Dynamic mechanical allodynia: a tactile stimulus is applied in a single sweeping motion (1 cm to 2 cm length) on the skin on the affected limb. The participants are asked to judge the stimulus intensity by means of an NRS (0 to 10). "0" in this case means "no pain". Each "pricking", "stinging" or "burning" sensation is defined as a painful sensation, which should always be evaluated by giving a value greater than "0". "10" corresponds to the individual maximum pain imaginable. Change from baseline was planned to analyzed.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) Ratio for the Thenar Muscle/Abductor Hallucis MuscleFrom baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 8 (Week 12)
Pressure pain threshold: using a pressure algometer (contact area 1 cm2), the threshold for pressure-induced pain is measured on the thenar muscle/abductor hallucis muscle in 3 series of slowly increasing stimulus intensities (at a rate of about 50 kPa/s). The threshold is then determined as the arithmetic mean of the 3 series (in kPa). The ratio of the thresholds of the affected limb versus the unaffected limb was planned to be calculated.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Ratio of the Figure of Eight Measurements of the Affected Limb Versus the Unaffected LimbFrom baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 8 (Week 12)
In participants with the CRPS sign of edema on the CRPS severity score at baseline, circumference of the hand or foot will be measured by the investigator with measurement tape using the figure-of-eight method at both the affected limb and the contralateral unaffected limb. Each measurement will be performed 3 times. The average of the 3 measurements will be used for further analysis. The ratio of the averages of the affected limb versus the unaffected limb was planned to be calculated and used for the determination of the change from baseline.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Pain Intensity Score (Weekly Average of Pain Values Recorded Daily in the Electronic Diary)From the Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) to Week 12Full Analysis Set; all participants treated in Treatment Period A with all data available at the time of last participant out following premature study termination.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the Average Pain Intensity Recorded on the Tablet ComputerFrom baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 11 (Week 26)
Data were not collected or analyzed because a confirmatory testing strategy was not performed as pre-specified in the protocol that secondary endpoints would only be tested if neridronic acid was superior to placebo on the primary outcome measure. A confirmatory or descriptive analysis was not performed due to early study termination.
SECONDARYPain Response to Treatment, Defined as at Least 30% Decrease From Baseline in the Average Pain Intensity at Week 12, Recorded on the Tablet ComputerFrom baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 8 (Week 12)
Data were not collected or analyzed because a confirmatory testing strategy was not performed as pre-specified in the protocol that secondary endpoints would only be tested if neridronic acid was superior to placebo on the primary outcome measure. A confirmatory or descriptive analysis was not performed due to early study termination.
SECONDARYPain Response to Treatment, Defined as at Least 30% Decrease From Baseline in the Average Pain Intensity at Week 26, Recorded on the Tablet ComputerFrom baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 11 (Week 26)
Data were not collected or analyzed because a confirmatory testing strategy was not performed as pre-specified in the protocol that secondary endpoints would only be tested if neridronic acid was superior to placebo on the primary outcome measure. A confirmatory or descriptive analysis was not performed due to early study termination.
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Pain Intensity Level of Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA)From baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 8 (Week 12)
Data were not collected or analyzed because a confirmatory testing strategy was not performed as pre-specified in the protocol that secondary endpoints would only be tested if neridronic acid was superior to placebo on the primary outcome measure. A confirmatory or descriptive analysis was not performed due to early study termination.
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) Ratio for the Thenar Muscle/Abductor Hallucis MuscleFrom baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 8 (Week 12)
Data were not collected or analyzed because a confirmatory testing strategy was not performed as pre-specified in the protocol that secondary endpoints would only be tested if neridronic acid was superior to placebo on the primary outcome measure. A confirmatory or descriptive analysis was not performed due to early study termination.
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Ratio of the Figure of Eight Measurements of the Affected Limb Versus the Unaffected LimbFrom baseline (Visit 2 [Day 1]) to Visit 8 (Week 12)
Data were not collected or analyzed because a confirmatory testing strategy was not performed as pre-specified in the protocol that secondary endpoints would only be tested if neridronic acid was superior to placebo on the primary outcome measure. A confirmatory or descriptive analysis was not performed due to early study termination.

Results by group2

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Pain Intensity Score (Weekly Average of Pain Values Recorded Daily in the Electronic Diary)Neridronic Acid - Treatment Period A-1.28Standard Error 0.270units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Pain Intensity Score (Weekly Average of Pain Values Recorded Daily in the Electronic Diary)Placebo - Treatment Period A-1.71Standard Error 0.268units on a scale

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Treatment Period A/Follow-up Period 1STARTEDNeridronic Acid - Treatment Period A48
Treatment Period A/Follow-up Period 1STARTEDPlacebo - Treatment Period A51
Treatment Period A/Follow-up Period 1Treatment Period A CompletersNeridronic Acid - Treatment Period A45
Treatment Period A/Follow-up Period 1Treatment Period A CompletersPlacebo - Treatment Period A45
Treatment Period A/Follow-up Period 1COMPLETEDNeridronic Acid - Treatment Period A12
Treatment Period A/Follow-up Period 1COMPLETEDPlacebo - Treatment Period A13
Treatment Period A/Follow-up Period 1NOT COMPLETEDNeridronic Acid - Treatment Period A36
Treatment Period A/Follow-up Period 1NOT COMPLETEDPlacebo - Treatment Period A38
Treatment Period B/Follow-up Period 2STARTEDNeridronic Acid - Treatment Period A9
Treatment Period B/Follow-up Period 2STARTEDPlacebo - Treatment Period A8

Adverse events342

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersBaseline to Week 26: Placebo TPA2512
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersBaseline to Week 26: Neridronic Acid TPA2482
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersWeek 26 to Week 52: Placebo TPA0430
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersWeek 26 to Week 52: Placebo TPA, Neridronic Acid TPB182
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersWeek 26 to Week 52: Neridronic Acid TPA0390
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersWeek 26 to Week 52: Neridronic Acid TPA, Neridronic Acid TPB090
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersBaseline to Week 26: Placebo TPA85112
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersBaseline to Week 26: Neridronic Acid TPA2482
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersWeek 26 to Week 52: Placebo TPA0430
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersWeek 26 to Week 52: Placebo TPA, Neridronic Acid TPB285

Adverse event totals18

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBaseline to Week 26: Placebo TPA051
Total, all-cause mortalityBaseline to Week 26: Neridronic Acid TPA048
Total, all-cause mortalityWeek 26 to Week 52: Placebo TPA043
Total, all-cause mortalityWeek 26 to Week 52: Placebo TPA, Neridronic Acid TPB08
Total, all-cause mortalityWeek 26 to Week 52: Neridronic Acid TPA039
Total, all-cause mortalityWeek 26 to Week 52: Neridronic Acid TPA, Neridronic Acid TPB09
Total, other adverse eventsBaseline to Week 26: Placebo TPA4051
Total, other adverse eventsBaseline to Week 26: Neridronic Acid TPA4048
Total, other adverse eventsWeek 26 to Week 52: Placebo TPA143
Total, other adverse eventsWeek 26 to Week 52: Placebo TPA, Neridronic Acid TPB68

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
19414839BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03560986

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03560986/events?page=2