ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03563053

Extension Treatment Using EryDex System in Patients With AT Who Participated in the ATTeST-IEDAT-02-2015 Study

NCT03563053, Phase 3, Terminated, Quince Therapeutics S.p.A.; results first posted 2024-10-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Extension Treatment Using EryDex System in Patients With AT Who Participated in the ATTeST-IEDAT-02-2015 Study. Trials, record NCT03563053. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03563053

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Extension Treatment Using EryDex System in Patients With AT Who Participated in the ATTeST-IEDAT-02-2015 Study
NCT number
NCT03563053
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
104 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Quince Therapeutics S.p.A.
Conditions
Ataxia Telangiectasia, Genetic Syndrome
Interventions
EryDex System
First posted
2018-06-20
Last updated
2024-10-08
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2018-000338-36
Results first posted
2024-10-08
Limitations and caveats
India was particularly affected by COVID-19-dependent treatment and visit interruptions.This long interruption would have resulted in insufficient long-term safety data. For this reason, EryDel (now Quince Therapeutics) decided to discontinue the IEDAT-03-2018 study in India.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyFrom Baseline (Visit 1 - Day 0) to Follow-up (~60 days after last infusion, i.e. up to 50.5 months)
Assessment of TEAEs, treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAE), and adverse events of special interest (AESI) were performed throughout the study, from the time of signing of the ICF at Baseline Visit through to the Final Study Visit (Month 12 or early discontinuation). All patients were to be followed up through 30 days after the Final Visit (Month 12 or early discontinuation) or at least 60 days after the final infusion, whichever was longer.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Using EQ-5D-5L Scale to Month 36From Baseline (Visit 1- Day 0) to Month 36
The EQ-5D included single item measures of 5 health dimensions: * mobility, * self-care, * usual activities, * pain / discomfort, and * anxiety / depression. The EQ-5D-5L included five levels of severity (i.e., no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems) for each of the five EQ-5D dimensions. These levels were scored from 1 = no problems to 5 = extreme problems: from 5, min/worst, to 25, best/max).The EQ-5D results were converted into a continuous index score: as for this index score, the closer the value is to 1, the better is the health status. The efficacy data focus mainly up to Month 36 as afterwards the number of patients / assessments dropped below 20% of the initial sample size, which was required for the efficacy evaluations.
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Improving, Stable or Worsening Score Using a Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) From Baseline (Visit 1- Day 0) to Month 36From Baseline (Visit 1- Day 0) to Month 36
The CGI-C scale assesses the change in the patient's clinical status from baseline using a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with a score of 4 indicating no change. Clinicians were required to conduct a full clinical interview and examination of the patient. The interview and examination assessed various aspects of the patient's appearance (grooming, evidence of falls, etc.), ataxia, cognition (orientation, calculation ability, language, ability to follow commands, memory, etc.), apraxia, dysarthria, extrapyramidal motor symptoms, activities of daily living, and mood. The higher the score the worse the outcome. The efficacy data focus mainly up to Month 36 as afterwards the number of patients / assessments dropped below 20% of the initial sample size, which was required for the efficacy evaluations.
SecondaryNumber of Patients With None to Severe (0 to 4) Scores in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-Structured of Neurological Symptoms of AT From Baseline (Visit 1 - Day 0) to Month 36From Baseline (Visit 1- Day 0) to Month 36
The CGI-S scale measures global severity of illness at a given point in time, and is usually rated on a 7-point, Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (normal, not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). No version of the CGI-S exists which has been specifically adapted for use in patients with A-T; therefore, a 5-point version was developed that considered the severity of the following symptoms of A-T: ataxia (walking), dysarthria, dysmetria, extrapyramidal symptoms (chorea, myoclonus, dystonia, and tremor), and eye movements. Ratings of none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), and very severe (4) were selected based on the level of symptomatology. The higher the score the worse the outcome. The efficacy data focus mainly up to Month 36 as afterwards the number of patients / assessments dropped below 20% of the initial sample size, which was required for the efficacy evaluations.
SecondaryChange From Baseline of the Modified International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (mICARS) Until Month 36From Baseline (Visit 1- Day 0) to Month 36
The International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) was an assessment of the degree of impairment in patients with cerebellar ataxia and was administered in its entirety; however, the primary efficacy assessment was based on the modified (m)ICARS, which excluded the Oculomotor domain (items 17 to 19) and items 8 to 12 of the Kinetic Functions domain of the ICARS. The mICARS was a 54 points maximum score (min 0) questionnaire divided into 3 sections: * Posture and Gait Disturbance section-7 items (min score 0, max score 34) * Kinetic Function-2 items (min 0, max 12) * Speech Disorder- 2 items (min 0, max 8). An higher scores - both for total and subscores - indicate a higher level of disease impairment. The subscores are added to give the total score. The efficacy data focus mainly up to Month 36 as afterwards the number of patients / assessments dropped below 20% of the initial sample size, which was required for the efficacy evaluations.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyFrom Baseline (Visit 1 - Day 0) to Follow-up (~60 days after last infusion, i.e. up to 50.5 months)
Safety Population (SAF): the Safety Analysis Set consisted of all patients who provided informed consent or assent and who received any dose of study medication during IEDAT-03-2018 study. The Safety Analysis Set was used for all safety analyses.
Number of eventsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Using EQ-5D-5L Scale to Month 36From Baseline (Visit 1- Day 0) to Month 36
Full Analysis Set Population (FAS): the FAS comprised all patients who entered IEDAT-03-2018 study, had a Baseline Efficacy Assessment in IEDAT-03-2018 and who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-Baseline Efficacy Assessment of the ICARS in this extension study.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With Improving, Stable or Worsening Score Using a Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) From Baseline (Visit 1- Day 0) to Month 36From Baseline (Visit 1- Day 0) to Month 36
The FAS comprised all patients who entered IEDAT-03-2018 study, had a Baseline Efficacy Assessment in IEDAT-03-2018 and who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-Baseline Efficacy Assessment of the ICARS in this extension study.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With None to Severe (0 to 4) Scores in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-Structured of Neurological Symptoms of AT From Baseline (Visit 1 - Day 0) to Month 36From Baseline (Visit 1- Day 0) to Month 36
The FAS comprised all patients who entered IEDAT-03-2018 study, had a Baseline Efficacy Assessment in IEDAT-03-2018 and who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-Baseline Efficacy Assessment of the ICARS in this extension study.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline of the Modified International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (mICARS) Until Month 36From Baseline (Visit 1- Day 0) to Month 36
The FAS comprised all patients who entered IEDAT-03-2018 study, had a Baseline Efficacy Assessment in IEDAT-03-2018 and who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-Baseline Efficacy Assessment of the ICARS in this extension study.
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group74

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyOverall Population (SAF)Number of TEAEs1232Number of events
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyOverall Population (SAF)Number of Serious TEAEs19Number of events
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyOverall Population (SAF)Number of TEAE leading to Death0Number of events
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyOverall Population (SAF)Number of TEAE leading to Permanent Withdrawal of Treatment5Number of events
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyOverall Population (SAF)Adverse Events During COVID-19 Interruption - On Dose5Number of events
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyOverall Population (SAF)Adverse Events During COVID-19 Interruption - Off Dose3Number of events
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyOverall Population (SAF)Adverse Events During COVID-19 Interruption - Restart55Number of events
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyOverall Population (SAF)TEAE by Worst Intensity - Mild1028Number of events
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyOverall Population (SAF)TEAE by Worst Intensity - Moderate187Number of events
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Throughout the StudyOverall Population (SAF)TEAE by Worst Intensity - Severe17Number of events

Participant flow11

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDActive Drug104
Overall StudyTotal SetActive Drug104
Overall StudySafety SetActive Drug104
Overall StudyFull Analysis SetActive Drug80
Overall StudyMonth 12Active Drug64
Overall StudyMonth 24Active Drug33
Overall StudyMonth 36Active Drug21
Overall StudyMonth 48Active Drug7
Overall StudyMonth 50.5Active Drug1
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDActive Drug0

Adverse events39

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsOverall Population (SAF)2310436
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsOverall Population (SAF)2110430
otherCorona Virus InfectionInfections and infestationsOverall Population (SAF)1710419
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsOverall Population (SAF)1010415
otherUrinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsOverall Population (SAF)61047
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersOverall Population (SAF)3310454
otherFatigueGeneral disordersOverall Population (SAF)1610420
otherInfusion Related ReactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsOverall Population (SAF)28104199
otherFallInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsOverall Population (SAF)710410
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersOverall Population (SAF)2310432

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOverall Population (SAF)0104
Total, other adverse eventsOverall Population (SAF)98104
Total, serious adverse eventsOverall Population (SAF)12104

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
39917433DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03563053

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03563053/results?page=2