Trial · NCT03566823
Registered outcomes18
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 18 of 18
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 16 | At Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain less than or equal to (\<=) 3 (based on 11 point numerical rating scale \[NRS\] ranging from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\]); and average daily stool frequency \<=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or discontinuation before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission were reported. |
| Primary | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | At Week 16 | Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) of at least 25 percent (%) from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with endoscopic response were reported. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 16 | At Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of \<150. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, \>451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. Number of participants with clinical remission as measured by CDAI were reported. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | At Week 16 | Enhanced endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD by matching segments of at least 50% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered non-responders. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item PRO With 4-point Scale for Abdominal Pain at Week 16 | At Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average daily abdominal pain \<=1 (based on the 4 point scale, with scores ranging from 0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency \<=3 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on 2-item PRO With 2 Criteria at Week 16 | At Week 16 | Clinical response was measured by 2-item PRO and defined as meeting at least 1 of the following 2 criteria: 1)A decrease of greater than or equal to (\>=) 30% and at least 2 points from baseline in the average daily worst abdominal pain over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) average daily stool frequency \<=2 of type 6/7 as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days; 2)A decrease of \>=30% from baseline in the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily worst abdominal pain either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) worst daily abdominal pain \<=3 (based on 11-point NRS) over the 7 most recent days. Participants with missing data at Week16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical response were reported. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-Item PRO With Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | At Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain \<=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency \<=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission and endoscopic response were reported. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Complete Endoscopic Healing at Week 16 | At Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain \<=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency \<=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with complete endoscopic healing were reported. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-100 at Week 16 | At Week 16 | Clinical response was measured by at least a 100-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-100 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, \>451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-70 at Week 16 | At Week 16 | Clinical response was measured by at least a 70-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-70 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, \>451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time | At Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\]); and average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Individual and Total Sign/Symptom Score Based on Participant Daily Electronic Diary (E-diary) Entries | Baseline and at Week 16 | CD clinical signs and symptoms includes total stool frequency, rectal bleeding frequency, rectal urgency frequency, nausea severity, vomiting frequency, and rectal incontinence frequency. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 16 | At Week 16 | Endoscopic healing was measured by SES-CD \<=4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline and no sub-score \>1 in any individual variable. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total (Absolute) Score at Weeks 8, 12 and 16 | Baseline, Weeks 8, 12 and 16 | The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring the disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) in participants with IBD, including CD. The IBDQ consists of 32 items, which are grouped into 4 domains and scored as: bowel function (10 to 70), systemic symptoms (5 to 35), emotional status (12 to 84), and social function (5 to 35). The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better HRQL. A score of at least 170 corresponds to clinical remission and an increase of at least 16 points is considered to indicate a clinically meaningful improvement. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Scores at Week 16 | Baseline, Week 16 | The SF-36, version 2 is a generic quality-of-life instrument that has been widely used to assess HRQL of participants. The SF-36 consists of 36 items that are aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning, role - physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role - emotional, and mental health), with scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better HRQL. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants Based on Incidence of All-cause Hospitalizations | Baseline up to Week 32 | Incidence of all cause hospitalizations was planned to be assessed. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants Based on Total Inpatient Days | Baseline up to Week 32 | Total inpatient days were planned to be assessed. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants Based on Incidence of CD-related Surgeries and Other Surgical Procedures | Baseline up to Week 32 | Incidence of CD-related surgeries and other surgical procedures were planned to be recorded. |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03566823/registered