ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03571672

DEF-314 Better Accuracy in Ejection Fraction (EF) Assessment With DEFINITY

NCT03571672, Phase 3, Completed, Lantheus Medical Imaging; results first posted 2020-12-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. DEF-314 Better Accuracy in Ejection Fraction (EF) Assessment With DEFINITY. Trials, record NCT03571672. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03571672

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
DEF-314 Better Accuracy in Ejection Fraction (EF) Assessment With DEFINITY
NCT number
NCT03571672
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
153 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Lantheus Medical Imaging
Conditions
Cardiac Disease
Interventions
DEFINITY
First posted
2018-06-27
Last updated
2020-12-17
Results first posted
2020-12-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAbsolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded ReaderUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imaging
Demonstrate improvement in accuracy in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment using Definity contrast-enhanced over unenhanced echocardiography by comparing LVEF Percentage Differences from CMR measured by 3 independent blinded image readers.
SecondarySecondary Objective 1: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded Reader for Suboptimal EchocardiogramsUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imaging
Demonstrate improvement in accuracy in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced over unenhanced echocardiography in subjects with suboptimal echocardiograms by comparing LVEF percentage differences from CMR measured by 3 independent readers.
SecondarySecondary Objective 2: Absolute Value LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR Between Blinded ReadersUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imaging
Demonstrate a reduction in inter-reader variability for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced versus unenhanced echocardiography by comparing LVEF Percentage Differences from CMR between 3 independent blinded readers
SecondarySecondary Objective 3: Absolute Value End-Diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded ReadersUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imaging
Demonstrate a reduction in inter-reader variability for the assessment of end-diastolic and systolic volumes using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced versus unenhanced echocardiography by comparing end-diastolic and systolic volume differences from CMR between 3 independent blinded readers.
SecondarySecondary Objective 4: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers for Suboptimal EchocardiogramsUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imaging
Demonstrate a reduction in inter-reader variability for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced versus unenhanced echocardiography by comparing LVEF Percentage Differences from CMR between 3 independent blinded readers in subjects with suboptimal echocardiograms.
SecondarySecondary Objective 5: Absolute Value End-Diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers for Suboptimal EchocardiogramsUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imaging
Demonstrate a reduction in inter-reader variability for the assessment of end-diastolic/systolic volumes using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced versus unenhanced echocardiography by comparing end-diastolic and systolic volume differences from CMR between 3 independent blinded readers in subjects with suboptimal echocardiograms.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAbsolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded ReaderUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imagingModified ITT PopulationPercent Ejection FractionMEAN
SECONDARYSecondary Objective 1: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded Reader for Suboptimal EchocardiogramsUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imagingPer-protocol population - Sub-optimal EchocardiogramsPercent Ejection FractionMEAN
SECONDARYSecondary Objective 2: Absolute Value LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR Between Blinded ReadersUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imagingPer-Protocol PopulationPercent Ejection FractionMEAN
SECONDARYSecondary Objective 3: Absolute Value End-Diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded ReadersUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imagingModified ITT PopulationmLMEAN
SECONDARYSecondary Objective 4: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers for Suboptimal EchocardiogramsUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imagingPer Protocol Population - Sub-Optimal EchocardiogramsPercent Ejection FractionMEAN
SECONDARYSecondary Objective 5: Absolute Value End-Diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers for Suboptimal EchocardiogramsUp to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imagingModified ITT population - Sub Optimal EchocardiogramsmLMEAN

Results by group48

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded ReaderBlinded Reader 1Echo Enhanced6.10Standard Deviation 5.319Percent Ejection Fraction
Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded ReaderBlinded Reader 2Echo Enhanced6.38Standard Deviation 5.227Percent Ejection Fraction
Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded ReaderBlinded Reader 3Echo Enhanced4.93Standard Deviation 4.288Percent Ejection Fraction
Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded ReaderBlinded Reader 1Echo Unenhanced6.18Standard Deviation 5.300Percent Ejection Fraction
Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded ReaderBlinded Reader 2Echo Unenhanced6.61Standard Deviation 5.256Percent Ejection Fraction
Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded ReaderBlinded Reader 3Echo Unenhanced5.36Standard Deviation 4.498Percent Ejection Fraction
Secondary Objective 1: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded Reader for Suboptimal EchocardiogramsBlinded Reader 1Echo Enhanced7.48Standard Deviation 6.228Percent Ejection Fraction
Secondary Objective 1: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded Reader for Suboptimal EchocardiogramsBlinded Reader 2Echo Enhanced7.16Standard Deviation 6.337Percent Ejection Fraction
Secondary Objective 1: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded Reader for Suboptimal EchocardiogramsBlinded Reader 3Echo Enhanced5.71Standard Deviation 5.293Percent Ejection Fraction
Secondary Objective 1: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded Reader for Suboptimal EchocardiogramsBlinded Reader 1Echo Unenhanced7.16Standard Deviation 6.184Percent Ejection Fraction

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDefinity153
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDefinity148
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDefinity5

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDefinity0153
Total, other adverse eventsDefinity0153
Total, serious adverse eventsDefinity0153

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03571672

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03571672/results?page=2