ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03588572

The Effect of Venlafaxine on Language Function in Patients With Subcortical Aphasia: A fMRI Study

NCT03588572, Not applicable, Completed, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command; results first posted 2019-10-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The Effect of Venlafaxine on Language Function in Patients With Subcortical Aphasia: A fMRI Study. Trials, record NCT03588572. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03588572

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The Effect of Venlafaxine on Language Function in Patients With Subcortical Aphasia: A fMRI Study
NCT number
NCT03588572
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
43 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command
Conditions
Subcortical Aphasia, Ischemic Stroke
Interventions
Venlafaxine hydrochloride capsules
First posted
2018-07-17
Last updated
2021-10-13
Results first posted
2019-10-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryA Change of Outcome Measure:the Chinese Version of Western Aphasia Battery(WAB)
This is an outcome measure to assess the improvement of language function from onset to 3 months after treatment. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
The main outcome measure for this scale is Aphasia Quotient(AQ) which mainly tests the ability of spontaneous speech, oral comprehension, repetition, and naming, and reflects the severity of aphasia, and can be used as a reliable indicator to evaluate the improvement and deterioration of aphasia. Score fluctuation is 0-100 points, the normal value is 98.4-100 points, AQ\<93.8 can be judged as language dysfunction.
SecondaryA Change of Outcome Measure:Spontaneous Language Frequency Test(SLFT)
This is an outcome measure to assess the improvement of language function from onset to 3 months after treatment. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
This test mainly assesses spontaneous speech fluency of participants.It requires participants name as many food names as possible within one minute, and each correct one to give one point.The higher the score, the better the language function.
SecondaryA Change of Outcome Measure:Picture Naming Test(PNT)
This is an outcome measure to assess the improvement of language function from onset to 3 months after treatment. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
This test mainly assesses the ability of picture name of participants.we used a program for displaying named pictures on a computer screen (60 photos in total, of which 20 were Chinese celebrity faces). Each image was displayed in 3 seconds, and 1 point was correctly named for an image.The faces of celebrities were selected from the picture database of Chinese celebrities in the State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning at Beijing Normal University.Score fluctuation is 0-60 points, the higher the score, the better the ability of picture name.
SecondaryFollow-up Measurement: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)
We must determine that the participant is not in depression at each follow-up. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) has proven useful for many years as a way of determining a patient's level of depression before, during, and after treatment. It generally takes 15-20 minutes to complete the interview and score the results. Eight items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Nine items are scored from 0-2. HAMD Scoring Instructions:0-7=Normal, 8-13 = Mild Depression, 14-18 = Moderate Depression, 19-22 = Severe Depression, ≥ 23 = Very Severe Depression(i.e.,Minimum 0 points and maximum 50 points, the higher the score, the greater the likelihood of depression).
SecondaryFollow-up Measurement: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)
We must determine that the participant is not in anxiety at each follow-up. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) is a widely used and well-validated tool for measuring the severity of a patient's anxiety. The HAMA is composed of 14 items and takes 15-20 minutes to complete the interview and score the results. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0=not present to 4=severe.HAMA Scoring Instructions:0-8=Normal, 8-13= Possible Anxiety, 14-17 = Mild Anxiety, 18-24 = Moderate Anxiety, 25-30 = Severe Anxiety(i.e.,the higher the score, the greater the likelihood of anxiety).
SecondaryFollow-up Measurement: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
We must determine that the participant is not in moderate or more cognitive impairment at each follow-up. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a 30-point questionnaire that is used extensively in clinical and research settings to measure cognitive impairment. Administration of the test takes between 5 and 10 minutes. The MMSE test includes simple questions and problems in a number of areas: the time and place of the test, repeating lists of words, arithmetic such as the serial sevens, language use and comprehension, and basic motor skills. Any score greater than or equal to 24 points (out of 30) indicates a normal cognition. Below this, scores can indicate severe (≤9 points), moderate (10-18 points) or mild (19-23 points) cognitive impairment.The raw score may also need to be corrected for educational attainment and age.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYA Change of Outcome Measure:the Chinese Version of Western Aphasia Battery(WAB)
This is an outcome measure to assess the improvement of language function from onset to 3 months after treatment. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYA Change of Outcome Measure:Spontaneous Language Frequency Test(SLFT)
This is an outcome measure to assess the improvement of language function from onset to 3 months after treatment. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYA Change of Outcome Measure:Picture Naming Test(PNT)
This is an outcome measure to assess the improvement of language function from onset to 3 months after treatment. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYFollow-up Measurement: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)
We must determine that the participant is not in depression at each follow-up. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYFollow-up Measurement: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)
We must determine that the participant is not in anxiety at each follow-up. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYFollow-up Measurement: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
We must determine that the participant is not in moderate or more cognitive impairment at each follow-up. Thus, participates will undergo this assessment on the first days (V1), 28±3 days (V2), and 90±3 days (V3) after randomization.
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group36

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
A Change of Outcome Measure:the Chinese Version of Western Aphasia Battery(WAB)Venlafaxine GroupVisitation 178.16Standard Deviation 7.93score on a scale
A Change of Outcome Measure:the Chinese Version of Western Aphasia Battery(WAB)Controlled GroupVisitation 178.60Standard Deviation 6.38score on a scale
A Change of Outcome Measure:the Chinese Version of Western Aphasia Battery(WAB)Venlafaxine GroupVisitation 288.24Standard Deviation 6.15score on a scale
A Change of Outcome Measure:the Chinese Version of Western Aphasia Battery(WAB)Controlled GroupVisitation 283.51Standard Deviation 5.37score on a scale
A Change of Outcome Measure:the Chinese Version of Western Aphasia Battery(WAB)Venlafaxine GroupVisitation 394.23Standard Deviation 4.38score on a scale
A Change of Outcome Measure:the Chinese Version of Western Aphasia Battery(WAB)Controlled GroupVisitation 388.55Standard Deviation 3.95score on a scale
A Change of Outcome Measure:Spontaneous Language Frequency Test(SLFT)Venlafaxine GroupVisitation 15.31Standard Deviation 1.99score on a scale
A Change of Outcome Measure:Spontaneous Language Frequency Test(SLFT)Controlled GroupVisitation 15.75Standard Deviation 1.81score on a scale
A Change of Outcome Measure:Spontaneous Language Frequency Test(SLFT)Venlafaxine GroupVisitation 29.31Standard Deviation 1.54score on a scale
A Change of Outcome Measure:Spontaneous Language Frequency Test(SLFT)Controlled GroupVisitation 28.13Standard Deviation 1.5score on a scale

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Visitation 1STARTEDVenlafaxine Group22
Visitation 1STARTEDControlled Group21
Visitation 1COMPLETEDVenlafaxine Group21
Visitation 1COMPLETEDControlled Group20
Visitation 1NOT COMPLETEDVenlafaxine Group1
Visitation 1NOT COMPLETEDControlled Group1
Visitation 2STARTEDVenlafaxine Group21
Visitation 2STARTEDControlled Group20
Visitation 2COMPLETEDVenlafaxine Group19
Visitation 2COMPLETEDControlled Group18

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityVenlafaxine Group016
Total, all-cause mortalityControlled Group016
Total, other adverse eventsVenlafaxine Group016
Total, other adverse eventsControlled Group016
Total, serious adverse eventsVenlafaxine Group016
Total, serious adverse eventsControlled Group016

Papers31

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
1202204BACKGROUNDPubMed
3107904BACKGROUNDPubMed
5522545BACKGROUNDPubMed
6080235BACKGROUNDPubMed
7574464BACKGROUNDPubMed
7678184BACKGROUNDPubMed
8606767BACKGROUNDPubMed
9555599BACKGROUNDPubMed
10884562BACKGROUNDPubMed
11230034BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 31

See all 31 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Venlafaxine Group vs Controlled Group: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Venlafaxine Group vs Controlled Group: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Picture Naming TestSecondary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03588572

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03588572/results?page=2