ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03619902

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in Adults With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

NCT03619902, Phase 2, Completed, Vanda Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2022-03-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in Adults With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis. Trials, record NCT03619902. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03619902

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in Adults With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
NCT number
NCT03619902
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
8 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Vanda Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
Interventions
Imsidolimab
First posted
2018-08-08
Last updated
2025-09-16
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2017-004021-33
Results first posted
2022-03-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ScaleWeek 4 and Week 16
Clinical response was defined as "Very much improved," "Much Improved," or "Minimally Improved" on the CGI scale according to the Modified Japanese Dermatological Association Severity Index (JDA-SI) total score. The JDA-SI includes assessment of skin lesions (area of erythema with pustules, area of erythema total, and area of edema) and fever, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein and serum albumin levels. The total score ranges from 0 to 17 (severe). CGI was assessed based on the JDA-SI according to the following: * Very Much Improved: Reduction in JDA-SI total score by 3 or \> points; * Much improved: Reduction in JDA-SI total score by 1 or 2 points; * Minimally improved: No change in JDA-SI total score and area of erythema with pustules reduced by \<20% or clinically meaningful improvement in at least 1 other component of the modified JDA-SI.
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area of Erythema With Pustules at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Excluding palms and soles from 0% to 100%. The palmar surface of one hand (using the subject's hand and including the fingers) represents 1% of his or her total BSA.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Japanese Dermatological Association - Severity Index (mJDA-SI) Total Skin Lesions Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
The area of erythema with pustules, area of total erythema and area of edema were assessed by the Investigator and scored from 0 to 3 on the following scale: * 0: 0% body surface area (BSA) affected; * 1: \> 0%, \< 10% BSA affected; * 2: ≥ 10%, \< 50% BSA affected; * 3: ≥ 50% BSA affected. The JDA-SI Total Skin Lesions Score is the sum of the area of erythema with pustules score, area of total erythema score and area of edema score and ranges between 0 and 9 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician's Global Assessment (GPPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
The GPPPGA scale was used to assess the impact and severity of GPP on the following scale: * 0: Clear (normal skin or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, no visible pustules, no scaling or crusting). * 1: Almost clear (faint, diffuse pink or slight red erythema, low density occasional small discrete pustules (noncoalescent), superficial focal scaling or crusting restricted to periphery of lesions). * 2: Mild (light red erythema, moderate density grouped discrete small pustules (noncoalescent), predominantly fine scaling or crusting). * 3: Moderate (bright red erythema, high density pustules with some coalescence, moderate scaling or crusting covering most or all lesions). * 4: Severe (deep fiery red erythema, very high density pustules with pustular lakes, severe scaling or crusting covering most or all lesions).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Baseline and Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that asks participants to evaluate the degree that their skin problem has affected their quality of life in the last week in the following 6 aspects: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school activities, personal relationships and treatment related feelings. Participants answer the 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the 10 questions, resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0 with higher scores indicating more impaired quality of life. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ScaleWeek 4 and Week 16The full analysis set (FAS) included all enrolled participants. Participants with missing data were categorized as non-responders.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area of Erythema With Pustules at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Full analysis set participants with available data at each time pointpercent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Japanese Dermatological Association - Severity Index (mJDA-SI) Total Skin Lesions Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Full analysis set participants with available data at each time pointpercent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician's Global Assessment (GPPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Full Analysis Set participants with GPPPGA at Baseline and at each time pointpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Baseline and Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Full analysis set participants with available data at each time pointscore on a scaleMEAN

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ScaleImsidolimabWeek 475.095% Confidence Interval 34.91 to 96.81percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ScaleImsidolimabWeek 1675.095% Confidence Interval 34.91 to 96.81percentage of participants
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area of Erythema With Pustules at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16ImsidolimabWeek 1-59.63Standard Deviation 39.895percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area of Erythema With Pustules at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16ImsidolimabWeek 4-94.17Standard Deviation 10.737percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area of Erythema With Pustules at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16ImsidolimabWeek 16-97.78Standard Deviation 5.443percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Japanese Dermatological Association - Severity Index (mJDA-SI) Total Skin Lesions Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16ImsidolimabWeek 1-25.74Standard Deviation 26.369percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Japanese Dermatological Association - Severity Index (mJDA-SI) Total Skin Lesions Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16ImsidolimabWeek 4-55.65Standard Deviation 27.157percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Japanese Dermatological Association - Severity Index (mJDA-SI) Total Skin Lesions Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16ImsidolimabWeek 16-62.20Standard Deviation 29.757percent change
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician's Global Assessment (GPPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16ImsidolimabWeek 10.095% Confidence Interval 0.00 to 52.18percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician's Global Assessment (GPPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16ImsidolimabWeek 450.095% Confidence Interval 6.76 to 93.24percentage of participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDImsidolimab8
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDImsidolimab6
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDImsidolimab2

Adverse events21

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersImsidolimab181
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersImsidolimab183
otherBlood folate decreasedInvestigationsImsidolimab181
otherBlood glucose increasedInvestigationsImsidolimab181
otherC-reactive protein increasedInvestigationsImsidolimab181
otherWhite blood cell count increasedInvestigationsImsidolimab181
otherOropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersImsidolimab282
otherPsoriasisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersImsidolimab181
otherSkin haemorrhageSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersImsidolimab181
otherMitral valve prolapseCardiac disordersImsidolimab181

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityImsidolimab08
Total, other adverse eventsImsidolimab68
Total, serious adverse eventsImsidolimab28

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03619902

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03619902/events?page=2