ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03627091

Efficacy and Safety Study of Ontamalimab as Maintenance Treatment in Participants With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (CARMEN CD 307)

NCT03627091, Phase 3, Terminated, Shire; results first posted 2022-03-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety Study of Ontamalimab as Maintenance Treatment in Participants With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (CARMEN CD 307). Trials, record NCT03627091. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03627091

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of Ontamalimab as Maintenance Treatment in Participants With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (CARMEN CD 307)
NCT number
NCT03627091
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
40 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Shire
Conditions
Crohn's Disease
Interventions
Ontamalimab, Placebo
First posted
2018-08-13
Last updated
2022-03-31
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2017-000617-23
Results first posted
2022-03-31
Limitations and caveats
The study was closed early as the sponsor discontinued the ontamalimab clinical trial program in CD for reasons unrelated to safety or efficacy.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 52At Week 52
Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO sub-scores of average worst daily abdominal pain less than or equal to (\<=) 3 (based on 11 point numerical rating scale \[NRS\] ranging from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\]); and average daily stool frequency \<=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 52 or discontinuation before Week 52 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission at Week 52 were reported.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 52At Week 52
Enhanced endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) of at least 50 percent (%) from induction study (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\] baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 52 or who discontinued before Week 52 were considered non responders. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response at Week 52 were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 52At Week 52
Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of \<150. CDAI assessed CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, \>451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. Participants with missing data at Week 52 or who discontinued before Week 52 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission as measured by CDAI at Week 52 were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Glucocorticoid-free Clinical Remission at Week 52At Week 52
Glucocorticoid-free clinical remission defined as clinical remission by 2-item PRO not requiring any treatment with glucocorticoids for at least 12 weeks prior to Week 52 visit. Clinical remission defined by 2-item PRO sub-scores of average worst daily abdominal pain \<=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\]); and average daily stool frequency\<=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 52 or who discontinued before Week 52 were non-responders. Number of participants with glucocorticoid-free clinical remission response at Week 52 were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission Defined by Crohn's Disease (CD) E-diary Sub-scores- at Week 52At Week 52
Clinical remission was defined by CD daily e-diary 2-item PRO subscores of average daily abdominal pain \<=1 (based on the 4 point scale, with scores ranging from 0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency \<=3 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 52 or who discontinued before Week 52 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission based on Crohn's Disease (CD) e-diary Sub-scores for abdominal pain was was reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 52At Week 52
Sustained clinical remission was defined as clinical remission by 2-item PRO at both Week 52 visit and the maintenance baseline in this Study. Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO sub-scores of average worst daily abdominal pain less than or equal to (\<=) 3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\]); and average daily stool frequency \<=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Number of participants with sustained clinical remission at Week 52 were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Sustained Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 52At Week 52
Sustained enhanced endoscopic response was defined as enhanced endoscopic response at both Week 52 visit and the maintenance baseline in this study. Enhanced endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD of at least 50 % from induction study (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\]) baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Number of participants with sustained enhanced endoscopic response at Week 52 were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item PRO With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 52At Week 52
Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO sub-scores of average worst daily abdominal pain \<=3 (based on 11-point NRS) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency \<= 2 of Type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as shown in the BSFS over the 7 most recent days. Participants with missing data at Week 52 or who discontinued before Week 52 were considered failures. Enhanced endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD of at least 50% from induction study (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\]) baseline. Participants with missing data at Week 52 or who discontinued before Week 52 were considered non-responders.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Complete Endoscopic Healing at Week 52At Week 52
Complete endoscopic healing was defined as SES-CD scale score from 0-2. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 52 or who discontinued before Week 52 were considered failures. Number of participants with complete endoscopic healing at Week 52 were reported.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 52At Week 52
The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of investigational product (IP) in the SHP647-307 study regardless of treatment received during the induction studies (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\]).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 52At Week 52
The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP in the SHP647-307 study regardless of treatment received during the induction studies (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\]).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 52At Week 52
The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP in the SHP647-307 study regardless of treatment received during the induction studies (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\]).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Glucocorticoid-free Clinical Remission at Week 52At Week 52
The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP in the SHP647-307 study regardless of treatment received during the induction studies (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\]).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission Defined by Crohn's Disease (CD) E-diary Sub-scores- at Week 52At Week 52
The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP in the SHP647-307 study regardless of treatment received during the induction studies (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\]).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 52At Week 52
The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP in the SHP647-307 study regardless of treatment received during the induction studies (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\]).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Sustained Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 52At Week 52
The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP in the SHP647-307 study regardless of treatment received during the induction studies (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\]).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item PRO With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 52At Week 52
The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP in the SHP647-307 study regardless of treatment received during the induction studies (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\]).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Complete Endoscopic Healing at Week 52At Week 52
The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP in the SHP647-307 study regardless of treatment received during the induction studies (either SHP647-305 \[NCT03559517\] or SHP647-306 \[NCT03566823\]).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group27

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 52Placebo2Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 52Ontamalimab 25 mg3Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 52Ontamalimab 75 mg5Participants
Number of Participants With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 52Placebo2Participants
Number of Participants With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 52Ontamalimab 25 mg4Participants
Number of Participants With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 52Ontamalimab 75 mg6Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 52Placebo8Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 52Ontamalimab 25 mg4Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 52Ontamalimab 75 mg7Participants
Number of Participants With Glucocorticoid-free Clinical Remission at Week 52Placebo2Participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo19
Overall StudySTARTEDOntamalimab 25 mg10
Overall StudySTARTEDOntamalimab 75 mg11
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo7
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOntamalimab 25 mg4
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOntamalimab 75 mg6
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOntamalimab 25 mg6
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOntamalimab 75 mg5

Adverse events153

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo0190
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersOntamalimab 25 mg1101
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersOntamalimab 75 mg0110
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo0190
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersOntamalimab 25 mg0100
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersOntamalimab 75 mg1111
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo1191
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOntamalimab 25 mg0100
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOntamalimab 75 mg0110
otherThrombocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo0190

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo019
Total, all-cause mortalityOntamalimab 25 mg010
Total, all-cause mortalityOntamalimab 75 mg011
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo919
Total, other adverse eventsOntamalimab 25 mg510
Total, other adverse eventsOntamalimab 75 mg811
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo119
Total, serious adverse eventsOntamalimab 25 mg010
Total, serious adverse eventsOntamalimab 75 mg211

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
38096402DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03627091

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03627091/results?page=2