ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03640312

Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Ultra-low-dose Treatment for Hypertension

NCT03640312, Phase 2, Completed, Washington University School of Medicine; results first posted 2023-09-22

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Ultra-low-dose Treatment for Hypertension. Trials, record NCT03640312. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03640312

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Ultra-low-dose Treatment for Hypertension
NCT number
NCT03640312
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
62 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Conditions
Hypertension
Interventions
QUARTET LDQT, Candesartan
First posted
2018-08-21
Last updated
2025-01-03
Results first posted
2023-09-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure12 weeksMean change (from baseline) in automated office systolic blood pressure adjusted for baseline values.
SecondaryMean Systolic Blood Pressure6 weeksMean automated office systolic blood pressure adjusted for baseline values.
SecondaryChange in Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure6 weeksMean change (from baseline) in automated office diastolic blood pressure adjusted for baseline values.
SecondaryMean Diastolic Blood Pressure6 weeksMean automated office diastolic blood pressure adjusted for baseline values.
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Hypertension Control6 and 12 weeksProportion of patients with hypertension control (percent with SBP \< 130 mmHg and DBP \<80 mmHg).
SecondaryNumber of Patients Requiring Step up Treatment6 weeksNumber of patients requiring step-up treatment.
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Adverse Event Free Hypertension Control12 weeksProportion of patients with adverse event free hypertension control (percent with SBP \< 130 mmHg and DBP \<80 mmHg).
SecondaryMedication Adherence12 weeksMedication adherence defined by objective pill counts
SecondaryHealth-related Quality of Life12 weeks
Mean change (from baseline) in health-related quality of life using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health instrument. PROMIS Global Health is a gauge of general health-care related quality of life. Possible PROMIS Global Physical Health and Global Mental Health scores range from 0-20, with 20 indicating best possible state of health. Raw scores are converted to T-scores to compare to a standardized population. A PROMIS T-score of 50 represents the mean of the population (SD = 10). Higher values here also indicate better health. A positive change in T score, as reported in this outcome measure, would represent an improvement in Global Physical Health or Global Mental Health at 12 weeks compared to baseline.
SecondaryChange in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure6 weeksMean change (from baseline) in automated office systolic blood pressure adjusted for baseline values.

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure12 weeks
Modified intent to treat whereby all those participants with data at any follow-up time point and baseline to contribute to analyses will be included in analyses according to arm to which they were randomized, regardless of adherence to the study protocol.
mm HgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Systolic Blood Pressure6 weeks
Modified intent to treat whereby all those participants with data at any follow-up time point and baseline to contribute to analyses will be included in analyses according to arm to which they were randomized, regardless of adherence to the study protocol.
mm HgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure6 weeks
Modified intent to treat whereby all those participants with data at any follow-up time point and baseline to contribute to analyses will be included in analyses according to arm to which they were randomized, regardless of adherence to the study protocol.
mm HgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Diastolic Blood Pressure6 weeks
Modified intent to treat whereby all those participants with data at any follow-up time point and baseline to contribute to analyses will be included in analyses according to arm to which they were randomized, regardless of adherence to the study protocol.
mm HgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With Hypertension Control6 and 12 weeks
Modified intent to treat whereby all those participants with data at any follow-up time point and baseline to contribute to analyses will be included in analyses according to arm to which they were randomized, regardless of adherence to the study protocol.
proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Requiring Step up Treatment6 weeks
Modified intent to treat whereby all those participants with data at any follow-up time point and baseline to contribute to analyses will be included in analyses according to arm to which they were randomized, regardless of adherence to the study protocol.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With Adverse Event Free Hypertension Control12 weeks
Modified intent to treat whereby all those participants with data at any follow-up time point and baseline to contribute to analyses will be included in analyses according to arm to which they were randomized, regardless of adherence to the study protocol.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMedication Adherence12 weeks
Modified intent to treat whereby all those participants with data at any follow-up time point and baseline to contribute to analyses will be included in analyses according to arm to which they were randomized, regardless of adherence to the study protocol.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYHealth-related Quality of Life12 weeksData are available on only 28 participants in the intervention group for the mental health T score.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure6 weeks
Modified intent to treat whereby all those participants with data at any follow-up time point and baseline to contribute to analyses will be included in analyses according to arm to which they were randomized, regardless of adherence to the study protocol.
mm HgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group38

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Mean Systolic Blood PressureQUARTET LDQT-15.6595% Confidence Interval -19.70 to -11.60mm Hg
Change in Mean Systolic Blood PressureCandesartan-10.8795% Confidence Interval -15.24 to -6.50mm Hg
Mean Systolic Blood PressureQUARTET LDQT122.3795% Confidence Interval 118.32 to 126.42mm Hg
Mean Systolic Blood PressureCandesartan127.1595% Confidence Interval 122.78 to 131.52mm Hg
Change in Mean Diastolic Blood PressureQUARTET LDQT-11.6095% Confidence Interval -14.16 to -9.04mm Hg
Change in Mean Diastolic Blood PressureCandesartan-6.7495% Confidence Interval -9.50 to -3.98mm Hg
Mean Diastolic Blood PressureQUARTET LDQT73.0195% Confidence Interval 70.46 to 75.57mm Hg
Mean Diastolic Blood PressureCandesartan77.8895% Confidence Interval 75.12 to 80.64mm Hg
Proportion of Patients With Hypertension ControlQUARTET LDQT6 weeks0.6875proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients With Hypertension ControlCandesartan6 weeks0.3929proportion of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDQUARTET LDQT32
Overall StudySTARTEDCandesartan30
Overall Study6 Week Follow UpQUARTET LDQT32
Overall Study6 Week Follow UpCandesartan28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDQUARTET LDQT29
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCandesartan24
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDQUARTET LDQT3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCandesartan6

Adverse events74

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVision blurredEye disordersQUARTET LDQT1321
otherVision blurredEye disordersCandesartan1301
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersQUARTET LDQT0320
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersCandesartan1301
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersQUARTET LDQT1321
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersCandesartan0300
otherEye pruritisEye disordersQUARTET LDQT1321
otherEye pruritisEye disordersCandesartan0300
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersQUARTET LDQT3323
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersCandesartan2302

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityQUARTET LDQT032
Total, all-cause mortalityCandesartan030
Total, other adverse eventsQUARTET LDQT2032
Total, other adverse eventsCandesartan1430
Total, serious adverse eventsQUARTET LDQT232
Total, serious adverse eventsCandesartan030

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
36116516DERIVEDPubMed
38156601DERIVEDPubMed
38584159DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons8

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
QUARTET LDQT vs Candesartan: Rate of Adverse Events of Special InterestTrial comparisons
QUARTET LDQT vs Candesartan: Proportion of Patients With Adverse Event Free Hypertension ControlTrial comparisons
QUARTET LDQT vs Candesartan: Percentage of Participants With Potentially Related Adverse EventsTrial comparisons
QUARTET LDQT vs Candesartan: Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Trial comparisons
QUARTET LDQT vs Candesartan: Medication AdherenceTrial comparisons
QUARTET LDQT vs Candesartan: Number of Patients Requiring Step up TreatmentTrial comparisons
QUARTET LDQT vs Candesartan: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
QUARTET LDQT vs Candesartan: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03640312

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03640312/results?page=2