ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Cognitive Training in Parkinson's Disease, the iPARK Study

NCT03680170, Not applicable, Unknown, Umeå University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleCognitive Training in Parkinson's Disease, the iPARK StudyClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT03680170ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusUnknownClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment80 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorUmeå UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsParkinson Disease, Cognitive ImpairmentClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsWorking memory updating training, Placebo trainingClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2018-09-21ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2021-06-22ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 52

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryCriterion task6-8 weeks (pretest-posttest 1)Improvement on Letter memory after 30 sessions of working memory training. total score:0-40 higher score indicate better performance total items:0-10 higher score indicate better performanceClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCriterion task16 weeks (posttest 1-posttest 2)
Maintenance of Letter memory performance four months after completed working memory training. total score:0-40 higher score indicate better performance total items:0-10 higher score indicate better performance
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task n-back6-8 weeks (pretest-posttest 1)
Improvement on updating performance measured by n-back (1,2 and 3 back) after 30 sessions of working memory training. 1. back total score: 0-90 higher score indicate better performance 2. back total score: 0-90 higher score indicate better performance 3. back total score: 0-90 higher score indicate better performance 1 back, Yes minus false alarms: 0-36 higher score indicate better performance 2 back, Yes minus false alarms: 0-36 higher score indicate better performance 3 back, Yes minus false alarms: 0-36 higher score indicate better performance
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task n-back16 weeks (posttest 1-posttest 2)
Maintenance of updating performance measured by n-back (1,2 and 3 back) four months after completed working memory training. 1. back total score: 0-90 higher score indicate better performance 2. back total score: 0-90 higher score indicate better performance 3. back total score: 0-90 higher score indicate better performance 1 back, Yes minus false alarms: 0-36 higher score indicate better performance 2 back, Yes minus false alarms: 0-36 higher score indicate better performance 3 back, Yes minus false alarms: 0-36 higher score indicate better performance
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task digit memory running span6-8 weeks (pretest-posttest 1)
Improvement on updating performance measured by digit memory running span after 30 sessions of working memory training. total score:0-40 higher score indicate better performance total items:0-10 higher score indicate better performance
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task digit memory running span16 weeks (posttest 1-posttest 2)
Maintenance of updating performance measured by digit memory running span four months after completed working memory training. total score:0-40 higher score indicate better performance total items:0-10 higher score indicate better performance
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryUpdating total score6-8 weeks (pretest-posttest 1)
Improvement in calculated composite score based on z-score((raw test score-mean of group)/standard deviation of group) for digit memory running span, 2-back and 3-back. Range -4 to 4. Higher z-score indicate better updating performance. (z score(3back yes-false alarms)+z score(2back yes-false alarms)+z score (digit memory running span total))/3
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryUpdating total score16 weeks (posttest 1-posttest 2)
Maintenance of calculated composite score based on z-score((raw test score-mean of group)/standard deviation of group) for digit memory running span, 2-back and 3-back. Range -4 to 4. Higher z-score indicate better updating performance. (z score(3back yes-false alarms)+z score(2back yes-false alarms)+z score (digit memory running span total))/3
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task episodic memory6-8 weeks (pretest-posttest 1)
Improvement on episodic memory performance measured by Buschke Selective Reminding Procedure after 30 sessions of working memory training. total score: 0-74 higher score indicate better performance list learning: 0-74 delayed score:0-18 higher score indicate better performance
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task episodic memory16 weeks (posttest 1-posttest 2)
Maintenance of on episodic memory performance measured by Buschke Selective Reminding Procedure four months after completed working memory training. total score: 0-74 higher score indicate better performance list learning: 0-74 higher score indicate better performance delayed score:0-18 higher score indicate better performance
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task digit span6-8 weeks (pretest-posttest 1)
Improvement on working memory performance measured by Digit span forward, backwards and sequencing (WAIS IV) after 30 sessions of working memory training. digit span forward total score: 0-16 higher score indicate better performance digit span backwards total score: 0-16 higher score indicate better performance digit span sequencing total score:0-16 higher score indicate better performance
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task digit span16 weeks (posttest 1-posttest 2)
Maintenance of working memory performance measured by Digit span forward, backwards and sequencing (WAIS IV) after 30 sessions of working memory training. digit span forward total score: 0-16 higher score indicate better performance digit span backwards total score: 0-16 higher score indicate better performance digit span sequencing total score:0-16 higher score indicate better performance
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task visuospatial-span6-8 weeks (pretest-posttest 1)Maintenance of visuospatial working memory performance measured by visuospatial span task, 0-18 higher score indicate better performanceClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task visuospatial-span16 weeks (posttest 1-posttest 2)Maintenance of visuospatial working memory performance measured by visuospatial span task, total score 0-18 higher score indicate better performanceClinicalTrials.gov
Secondaryworking memory total score6-8 weeks (pretest-posttest 1)
Improvement in calculated composite score based on z-score((raw test score-mean of group)/standard deviation of group) from digit span forward, digit span backward, digit span sequencing and visuospatial span task, higher score indicate better performance Range -4 to 4. (z score(digit span forward)+z score(digit span backward)+z score (digit span sequencing)+z score (visuospatial span task))/4
ClinicalTrials.gov
Secondaryworking memory total score16 weeks (posttest 1-posttest 2)
Maintenance in calculated composite score based on z-score((raw test score-mean of group)/standard deviation of group) from digit span forward, digit span backward, digit span sequencing and visuospatial span task, higher score indicate better performance. Range -4 to 4. (z score(digit span forward)+z score(digit span backward)+z score (digit span sequencing)+z score (visuospatial span task))/4
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task Matrices (WAIS IV)6-8 weeks (pretest-posttest 1)Improvement on problem solving performance measured by Matrices (WAIS IV) after 30 sessions of working memory training. total score: 0-26, higher score indicate better performanceClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task Matrices (WAIS IV)16 weeks (posttest 1-posttest 2)Maintenance of problem solving performance measured by Matrices (WAIS IV) after 30 sessions of working memory training. total score: 0-26, higher score indicate better performanceClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task Digit symbol6-8 weeks (pretest-posttest 1)Improvement on mental and psychomotor speed measured by Digit symbol after 30 sessions of working memory training. total score: 0-135, higher score indicate better performanceClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTransfer task Digit symbol16 weeks (posttest 1-posttest 2)Maintenance of mental and psychomotor speed measured by Digit symbol four months after completed working memory training. total score: 0-135, higher score indicate better performanceClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 24

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
12023324BACKGROUNDPubMed
16713924BACKGROUNDPubMed
17227183BACKGROUNDPubMed
18550595BACKGROUNDPubMed
18556560BACKGROUNDPubMed
19140643BACKGROUNDPubMed
19538208BACKGROUNDPubMed
19733364BACKGROUNDPubMed
20230116BACKGROUNDPubMed
20382919BACKGROUNDPubMed
20630350BACKGROUNDPubMed
20880750BACKGROUNDPubMed
21327348BACKGROUNDPubMed
21817043BACKGROUNDPubMed
22021174BACKGROUNDPubMed
22409508BACKGROUNDPubMed
22742929BACKGROUNDPubMed
24363137BACKGROUNDPubMed
26519540BACKGROUNDPubMed
27688923BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 8

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
1-Back TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
2-Back TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Balloon RiskOther outcomeConductCognition
Digit Span TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Running SpanSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test ASecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test BSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)