ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03681093

Study of Efficacy of Fevipiprant in Patients With Nasal Polyposis and Asthma

NCT03681093, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2021-01-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Efficacy of Fevipiprant in Patients With Nasal Polyposis and Asthma. Trials, record NCT03681093. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03681093

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Efficacy of Fevipiprant in Patients With Nasal Polyposis and Asthma
NCT number
NCT03681093
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
98 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Nasal Polyps
Interventions
Fevipiprant 150 mg, Fevipiprant 450 mg, Placebo
First posted
2018-09-21
Last updated
2021-10-11
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2018-002073-22
Results first posted
2021-01-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16
Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) is the sum of the right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. Total score ranges from 0 to 8 (scored 0 \[no polyp\] to 4 \[large polyps\] for each nostril), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. Baseline NPS is defined as the last measurement performed on or before the date of randomization. A negative change from baseline in NPS is considered a favorable outcome.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16
The nasal congestion score (NCS) is assessed via a questionnaire where patients are asked "Is your nose blocked?" with responses ranging from 0 = not at all, to 3=severe. Baseline NCS is defined as the last assessment performed on or before the date of randomization. A negative change from baseline in NCS is considered a favorable outcome.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the SNOT-22 Questionnaire at Week 16Baseline, Week 16
SNOT-22 (Sino-Nasal Outcome Test) Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been for them over the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL. Baseline SNOT-22 is defined as the last assessment performed on or before the date of randomization. A negative change from baseline in SNOT-22 is considered a favorable outcome.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sense of Smell as Assessed by the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) at Week 16Baseline, Week 16
The UPSIT (University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test) is a test that measures an individual's ability to detect odors. It consists of 4 workbooks of 10 pages each. On each page there is a different "scratch and sniff" strip which is embedded with a microencapsulated odorant and a question regarding the smell detected with a four-choice option for the response. The total number of questions in UPSIT is 40. The number of correct responses regarding the smells being experienced is summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 40, with a higher score indicating a better sense of smell. Baseline UPSIT is defined as the last assessment performed on or before the date of randomization. A positive change from baseline in UPSIT is considered a favorable outcome.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Full Analysis Setscore on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Full Analysis Setscore on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the SNOT-22 Questionnaire at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Full Analysis Setscore on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Sense of Smell as Assessed by the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Full Analysis Setscore on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score at Week 16Fevipiprant 150 mg0.20Standard Error 0.224score on scale
Change From Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score at Week 16Fevipiprant 450 mg-0.10Standard Error 0.216score on scale
Change From Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score at Week 16Placebo0.14Standard Error 0.233score on scale
Change From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Score at Week 16Fevipiprant 150 mg-0.15Standard Error 0.172score on scale
Change From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Score at Week 16Fevipiprant 450 mg-0.35Standard Error 0.171score on scale
Change From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Score at Week 16Placebo-0.80Standard Error 0.181score on scale
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the SNOT-22 Questionnaire at Week 16Fevipiprant 150 mg-3.23Standard Error 3.349score on scale
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the SNOT-22 Questionnaire at Week 16Fevipiprant 450 mg-10.61Standard Error 3.358score on scale
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the SNOT-22 Questionnaire at Week 16Placebo-8.44Standard Error 3.571score on scale
Change From Baseline in Sense of Smell as Assessed by the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) at Week 16Fevipiprant 150 mg1.05Standard Error 1.242score on scale

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFevipiprant 150 mg32
Overall StudySTARTEDFevipiprant 450 mg34
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo32
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Fevipiprant 150 mg31
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Fevipiprant 450 mg32
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Placebo28
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set (SAF)Fevipiprant 150 mg32
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set (SAF)Fevipiprant 450 mg34
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set (SAF)Placebo32
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFevipiprant 150 mg32

Adverse events153

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherIron deficiency anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFevipiprant 150 mg032
otherIron deficiency anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFevipiprant 450 mg134
otherIron deficiency anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo032
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersFevipiprant 150 mg132
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersFevipiprant 450 mg034
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo032
otherTympanic membrane perforationEar and labyrinth disordersFevipiprant 150 mg032
otherTympanic membrane perforationEar and labyrinth disordersFevipiprant 450 mg134
otherTympanic membrane perforationEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo032
otherConjunctival haemorrhageEye disordersFevipiprant 150 mg032

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFevipiprant 150 mg032
Total, all-cause mortalityFevipiprant 450 mg034
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo032
Total, other adverse eventsFevipiprant 150 mg1732
Total, other adverse eventsFevipiprant 450 mg1334
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1132
Total, serious adverse eventsFevipiprant 150 mg032
Total, serious adverse eventsFevipiprant 450 mg034
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo032

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03681093

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03681093/events?page=2