ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03692312

Efficacy and Safety of Tideglusib in Congenital Myotonic Dystrophy

NCT03692312, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, AMO Pharma Limited; results first posted 2025-09-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Tideglusib in Congenital Myotonic Dystrophy. Trials, record NCT03692312. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03692312

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Tideglusib in Congenital Myotonic Dystrophy
NCT number
NCT03692312
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
56 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AMO Pharma Limited
Conditions
Congenital Myotonic Dystrophy
Interventions
Tideglusib, Placebo
First posted
2018-10-02
Last updated
2025-10-08
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2016-004623-23
Results first posted
2025-09-11
Limitations and caveats
None reported

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Clinician-Completed Congenital DM1 Rating Scale (CDM1-RS)Baseline and week 20
The Clinician-Completed Congenital DM1 Scale is an 11-item rating scale completed by the clinician that scores the symptom severity of domains that are clinically relevant in Congenital DM1. The severity of the clinician's concern in each domain is scored by using a 5-point Likert Scale. Scores range from 0 = Not present to 4 = Very severe.
SecondaryChange in Clinical Global Impression- Improvement Scale (CGI-I) ScoresBaseline and week 20
The clinician administered CGI-I rates how much the subject's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state. A 7-point Likert type scale is used with ratings of 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse.
SecondaryChange in Top 3 Caregiver Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ScoreBaseline and week 20
The Top 3 concerns VAS allows caregivers to identify their main three causes of concern, related to the subject's myotonic dystrophy, rather than these being pre-specified within a scale and then rating how these concerns have changed at specific time-points during the study. Caregivers were asked to rate three causes for concern by drawing a vertical mark on a 10 cm long VAS with anchors of "not at all severe" at the left end (0 cm) and "very severe" at the right end (10 cm). A score for each concern was to be determined by measuring the number of centimeters on the 10 cm VAS line from the anchor point on the left side of the line. A total VAS score for each subject was calculated as the sum of the scores for the 3 concerns (minimum = 0 cm, maximum = 30 cm). A higher score represents a worse outcome.
SecondaryCaregiver Completed Congenital DM1 Rating Scale (CC-CDM1-RS)Baseline and week 20
The Caregiver-Completed Congenital DM1 Scale is a caregiver assessment of the subject on symptoms that may occur in individuals with CDM1. There are a total of 11 clinically relevant symptoms that the caregiver is asked to rate the severity of. The symptoms are rated on a score from 0 to 4 based on overall severity where 0 = symptom not present or is no longer present during the relevant time frame, and 4 = very severe, symptom causes pronounced and consistent impairment and is highly disruptive with regard to daily life. A total CC-CDM1-RS score for each subject was calculated as the sum of the scores where 0 = min and 44 = max. A higher score represents a worse outcome.
SecondaryClinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S)Baseline and week 20
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the subject's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with subjects who have the same diagnosis. Subjects are assessed on severity of illness at the time of rating 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill.
Secondary10-meter Walk-run Test20 weeksThe 10-meter walk/run test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in seconds over a short distance. It can be used as an assessment of functional mobility.
SecondaryNumber of Adverse Events (AEs), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Between Screening to End of Study.Between Screening to End of Study, up to 28 weeksAdverse events may be volunteered spontaneously by the subject, or discovered as a result of general, non-leading questioning by physician.
SecondaryNumber of Abnormal Findings in Objective Assessments (e.g. Laboratory Values, ECGs, Vital Signs and Bone Mineral Density) Between Screening and End of Study.Between Screening to End of Study, up to 28 weeks
Abnormal laboratory findings (e.g. hematology, liver function, biochemistry, urinalysis) or other abnormal assessments (e.g. ECGs, vital signs) that are judged by the Investigator as clinically significant will be recorded as AEs or SAEs if they meet the definition of an AE. The Investigator will exercise his or her medical and scientific judgment in deciding whether an abnormal laboratory finding or other abnormal assessment is clinically significant.
SecondaryCDM1-RS Independent Central Rater Score (CDM1-RS)Baseline to week 20
Change from baseline to end of treatment in the independent central rater CDM1-RS total score. CDM1 Rating Scale is an 11-item rating scale completed by the clinician to score the symptom severity that are clinically relevant in CDM1. The severity of the clinician's concern in each domain is scored by using a 5-point Likert Scale. Scores range from 0 = Not present to 4 = Very severe.
SecondaryCGI-I Independent Central Rater Score (CGI-I)Baseline and week 20
The CGI-I requires the clinician to rate how much the subject's illness has changed (improved, worsened or stayed the same) relative to a baseline state on a seven point scale. A 7-point Likert type scale is used with ratings of 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Clinician-Completed Congenital DM1 Rating Scale (CDM1-RS)Baseline and week 20score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Clinical Global Impression- Improvement Scale (CGI-I) ScoresBaseline and week 20
A subject (randomized to tideglusib) withdrew consent on Day 12 of randomized treatment and was excluded from the intent-to-treat analysis, full and per-protocol analysis sets as they did not have a post-baseline efficacy assessment.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Top 3 Caregiver Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ScoreBaseline and week 20score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYCaregiver Completed Congenital DM1 Rating Scale (CC-CDM1-RS)Baseline and week 20score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYClinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S)Baseline and week 20score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARY10-meter Walk-run Test20 weeksSecondsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Adverse Events (AEs), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Between Screening to End of Study.Between Screening to End of Study, up to 28 weeks
A participant assigned to placebo was found to have some tideglusib levels (due to inadvertent exposure between siblings in opposing arms), and was therefore, included in the safety analysis and full analysis sets for tideglusib.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Abnormal Findings in Objective Assessments (e.g. Laboratory Values, ECGs, Vital Signs and Bone Mineral Density) Between Screening and End of Study.Between Screening to End of Study, up to 28 weeks
A participant assigned to placebo was found to have some tideglusib levels (due to inadvertent exposure between siblings in opposing arms), and was therefore, included in the safety analysis and full analysis sets for tideglusib.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCDM1-RS Independent Central Rater Score (CDM1-RS)Baseline to week 20
A subject (randomized to tideglusib) withdrew consent on Day 12 of randomized treatment and was excluded from the intent-to-treat analysis, full and per-protocol analysis sets as they did not have a post-baseline efficacy assessment.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYCGI-I Independent Central Rater Score (CGI-I)Baseline and week 20
A subject (randomized to tideglusib) withdrew consent on Day 12 of randomized treatment and was excluded from the intent-to-treat analysis, full and per-protocol analysis sets as they did not have a post-baseline efficacy assessment.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group73

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Clinician-Completed Congenital DM1 Rating Scale (CDM1-RS)Tideglusib-1.65Standard Error 0.620score on a scale
Change in Clinician-Completed Congenital DM1 Rating Scale (CDM1-RS)Placebo-3.40Standard Error 0.618score on a scale
Change in Clinical Global Impression- Improvement Scale (CGI-I) ScoresTideglusib3.11Standard Error 0.190score on a scale
Change in Clinical Global Impression- Improvement Scale (CGI-I) ScoresPlacebo2.77Standard Error 0.189score on a scale
Change in Top 3 Caregiver Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ScoreTideglusib-1.74Standard Error 0.780score on a scale
Change in Top 3 Caregiver Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ScorePlacebo-6.47Standard Error 0.780score on a scale
Caregiver Completed Congenital DM1 Rating Scale (CC-CDM1-RS)Tideglusib-0.18Standard Error 0.770score on a scale
Caregiver Completed Congenital DM1 Rating Scale (CC-CDM1-RS)Placebo-3.36Standard Error 0.782score on a scale
Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S)Tideglusib-0.20Standard Error 0.076score on a scale
Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S)Placebo-0.12Standard Error 0.076score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTideglusib27
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo26
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTideglusib25
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo25
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTideglusib2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo1

Adverse events32

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasopharyngytitisInfections and infestationsTideglusib3284
otherNasopharyngytitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo3253
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsTideglusib3284
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo2252
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsTideglusib2282
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPlacebo1251
otherCoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersTideglusib4284
otherCoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo0250
otherRhinorrheaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersTideglusib3283
otherRhinorrheaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo1251

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTideglusib028
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo025
Total, other adverse eventsTideglusib2028
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1925
Total, serious adverse eventsTideglusib128
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo025

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Tideglusib vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Tideglusib vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03692312

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03692312/results?page=2