ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03696342

Efficacy of the Ophthalmic Pazufloxacin 0.6% for Bacterial Conjunctivitis, Compared to Gatifloxacin 0.3%.

NCT03696342, Phase 3, Terminated, Laboratorios Sophia S.A de C.V.; results first posted 2021-08-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy of the Ophthalmic Pazufloxacin 0.6% for Bacterial Conjunctivitis, Compared to Gatifloxacin 0.3%. Trials, record NCT03696342. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03696342

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy of the Ophthalmic Pazufloxacin 0.6% for Bacterial Conjunctivitis, Compared to Gatifloxacin 0.3%.
NCT number
NCT03696342
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
46 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Laboratorios Sophia S.A de C.V.
Conditions
Conjunctivitis, Bacterial
Interventions
Pazufloxacin, Zymar
First posted
2018-10-04
Last updated
2021-08-24
Results first posted
2021-08-24
Limitations and caveats
This trial was terminated early due to the sponsor's convenience in the pipeline followed by the studied product. A small sample renders this results as merely descriptive.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAmount of Conjunctival Secretion Present in Each Patient by the End of Treatmentwill be evaluated at the end of the treatment (day 8, final visit)The ocular secretion will be classified as 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. The number will be reported according to the rating granted at final visit.
PrimarySevereness of Conjunctival Bulbar Hyperemia in Each Patient by the End of Treatmentwill be evaluated at the end of the treatment (day 8, final visit)
Conjunctival hyperemia is defined as the simplest reaction of the conjunctiva to a stimulus, a red appearance secondary to the vasodilation of the conjunctival vessels of variable intensity. Will be graduated using the Efron scale. 0 Normal , 1 Very slight, 2 Mild, 3 Moderate, 4 Severe.
SecondaryOverall Rating (Global Qualification) of Product's Efficacy as Classified by Main Investigator by the End of Treatmentwill be evaluated at the end of the treatment (day 8, final visit)
The global qualification of the investigator constitutes the integral judgment of the clinical picture of the subject, including signs and symptoms, after a routine ophthalmological evaluation and interrogation. It will be classified 0 = cure, 1 = improvement, 2 = no changes compared to before starting treatment, 3 = worsened. It will be registered in the CRF in each of the follow-up visits.
SecondaryPresence of Bacterial Eradication Compared to Baseline Culture Resultswill be evaluated at the end of the treatment (day 8, final visit)
The conjunctival secretion sample will be taken prior to the instillation of any medication, the result of the basal crop will be compared against the results of the final crop and the absence of bacterial species that were present in the culture of the baseline visit is considered bacterial eradication.
SecondaryAdverse Eventsday 0 to day 17 (visit 0 to security call)
The evaluation of adverse events requires a questioning conducted by the principal investigator and the appropriate exploratory techniques for its detection. the number of adverse events per study group will be considered for the analysis
SecondaryPresence of Clinical Remission Defined as Absence of Hyperemia and Secretion by the Final Visitwill be evaluated at the end of the treatment (day 8, final visit)The clinical remission in the visits will be evaluated as "Yes" or "No", to report "Yes" it must have a grade of "0" in conjunctival hyperemia and "0" in secretion; otherwise, you must report as "No".

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAmount of Conjunctival Secretion Present in Each Patient by the End of Treatmentwill be evaluated at the end of the treatment (day 8, final visit)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYSevereness of Conjunctival Bulbar Hyperemia in Each Patient by the End of Treatmentwill be evaluated at the end of the treatment (day 8, final visit)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYOverall Rating (Global Qualification) of Product's Efficacy as Classified by Main Investigator by the End of Treatmentwill be evaluated at the end of the treatment (day 8, final visit)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPresence of Bacterial Eradication Compared to Baseline Culture Resultswill be evaluated at the end of the treatment (day 8, final visit)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYAdverse Eventsday 0 to day 17 (visit 0 to security call)number of adverse eventsNUMBER
SECONDARYPresence of Clinical Remission Defined as Absence of Hyperemia and Secretion by the Final Visitwill be evaluated at the end of the treatment (day 8, final visit)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group20

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Amount of Conjunctival Secretion Present in Each Patient by the End of TreatmentPRO-157Absent20Participants
Amount of Conjunctival Secretion Present in Each Patient by the End of TreatmentZymarAbsent21Participants
Amount of Conjunctival Secretion Present in Each Patient by the End of TreatmentPRO-157Mild2Participants
Amount of Conjunctival Secretion Present in Each Patient by the End of TreatmentZymarMild2Participants
Severeness of Conjunctival Bulbar Hyperemia in Each Patient by the End of TreatmentPRO-157Normal17Participants
Severeness of Conjunctival Bulbar Hyperemia in Each Patient by the End of TreatmentZymarNormal20Participants
Severeness of Conjunctival Bulbar Hyperemia in Each Patient by the End of TreatmentPRO-157Very mild5Participants
Severeness of Conjunctival Bulbar Hyperemia in Each Patient by the End of TreatmentZymarVery mild3Participants
Overall Rating (Global Qualification) of Product's Efficacy as Classified by Main Investigator by the End of TreatmentPRO-157Cure16Participants
Overall Rating (Global Qualification) of Product's Efficacy as Classified by Main Investigator by the End of TreatmentZymarCure19Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPRO-1572323
Overall StudySTARTEDZymar2323
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPRO-1572222
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDZymar2323
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPRO-15711
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDZymar00

Adverse events24

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherBurning sensationEye disordersPRO-157192319
otherBurning sensationEye disordersZymar152315
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPRO-1570230
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersZymar2232
otherOcular PainEye disordersPRO-1570230
otherOcular PainEye disordersZymar2232
otherBlepharoedemaEye disordersPRO-1570230
otherBlepharoedemaEye disordersZymar2232
otherSprainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPRO-1570230
otherSprainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersZymar1231

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPRO-157023
Total, all-cause mortalityZymar023
Total, other adverse eventsPRO-1572023
Total, other adverse eventsZymar1823
Total, serious adverse eventsPRO-157023
Total, serious adverse eventsZymar023

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
PRO-157 vs Zymar: Presence of Clinical Remission Defined as Absence of Hyperemia and Secretion by the Final VisitTrial comparisons
PRO-157 vs Zymar: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
PRO-157 vs Zymar: Presence of Bacterial Eradication Compared to Baseline Culture ResultsTrial comparisons
PRO-157 vs Zymar: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03696342

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03696342/events?page=2