ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03702244

The PRECISE Protocol: Prospective Randomized Trial of the Optimal Evaluation of Cardiac Symptoms and Revascularization

NCT03702244, Not applicable, Completed, HeartFlow, Inc.; results first posted 2023-12-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The PRECISE Protocol: Prospective Randomized Trial of the Optimal Evaluation of Cardiac Symptoms and Revascularization. Trials, record NCT03702244. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03702244

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The PRECISE Protocol: Prospective Randomized Trial of the Optimal Evaluation of Cardiac Symptoms and Revascularization
NCT number
NCT03702244
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
2,103 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
HeartFlow, Inc.
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Interventions
cCTA with selective FFRct
First posted
2018-10-11
Last updated
2023-12-29
Results first posted
2023-12-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPrimary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive Disease1 year
The centrally adjudicated (by Clinical Events Committee) primary end point was a composite of clinical efficiency as a gatekeeper to invasive testing (catheterization without obstructive CAD) and safety (death, non fatal myocardial infarction \[MI\]) at 1 year. Invasive cardiac catheterization without obstructive coronary artery disease defined as the absence of any ≥50% stenosis or hemodynamic indication of significance (no FFR ≤0.80 or iFR≤0.89) in any major epicardial vessel including side branches ≥2 mm in diameter, as determined by core-lab adjudicated quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) or if QCA not performed, by site report. A detailed description and information on the definitions of primary endpoint component definitions is provided in the current version of the study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and the published trial design article.
SecondaryNumber of Unplanned Hospitalizations (Including Admissions With Death or MI)1 year
Urgent and unscheduled hospitalizations for cardiovascular causes include hospitalization for ischemic heart disease including myocardial infarction and unstable angina, cerebrovascular disease including stroke and TIA, heart failure, acute and/or critical limb ischemia, other thrombotic events including pulmonary embolism, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest and other clear cardiovascular causes for hospitalization that do not meet the criteria for the specific events listed here (e.g., hospitalization for acute cardiac chest pain that does not meet the criteria for MI or UA).
SecondaryNumber of Catheterization and Revascularization Procedures1 year
Catheterization efficiency was defined as the proportion of invasive cardiac catheterization patients who undergo revascularization (PCI or CABG) within 6 months. Revascularization may occur either percutaneously (PCI) or surgically (CABG) or as hybrid (PCI and CABG). For PCI, any intervention on a lesion in the coronary tree (including angioplasty, stenting, intravascular lithotripsy) whether successful or not will be considered a revascularization. For CABG the start of the surgical procedure (skin incision) was considered as CABG, whether the procedure was successful or not. Staged revascularization was considered as one revascularization event.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Preventive Medication Use1 Year
Lipid-lowering agents included statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors. Antiplatelet agents included aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel. Antihypertensive medications included calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitor, beta blockers, nitrates, or diuretics.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Quality of Life (Angina Frequency) Assessment1 year
Overall health status was assessed briefly using the EQ-5D-5L, a standardized generic measure that can also be used to link specific health states to general population-based utilities. The EQ-5D-5L consists of two parts: (1) a descriptive assessment of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each of which can take one of five responses corresponding to the level of severity within each dimension, and (2) a self-rating 0- 100 "thermometer" of current health-related quality of life. The proportion of participants with frequent angina (Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score \<80).
SecondaryCumulative Radiation Exposure From All Cardiovascular Procedures (12 M), MilliSievert (mSv)1 year
The cumulative radiation exposure over the 12 months following Randomization was calculated based on each participant's exposure to radiation for cardiovascular care. If data are missing in \> 80% or more of the diagnostic and procedural testing, a single fixed estimate of radiation based on the literature will be used to impute. Given high missingness in catheterization data, a fixed estimate of 6.6 mSv and 4.1 mSv was used for catheterization with and without revascularization, respectively, based on recent trial data.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPrimary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive Disease1 year
Statistical testing for recurrent events was performed using the negative binomial methods for recurrent events. The primary endpoint of this study is estimated as time to first occurrence of any of its three following components: All-cause death; Non-fatal MI; Invasive cardiac catheterization without obstructive CAD.
number of eventsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Unplanned Hospitalizations (Including Admissions With Death or MI)1 yearFor All Cause Hospitalization only a descriptive summary will be presented.number of eventsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Catheterization and Revascularization Procedures1 year
Additionally catheterization efficiency or cath yield is defined as the proportion of participants with an invasive coronary angiogram who underwent revascularization within 6 months of catheterization. Rates will be summarized by 2 groups.
number of eventsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Preventive Medication Use1 YearThe number (%) will be summarized between the precision care arm and usual care arm.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Quality of Life (Angina Frequency) Assessment1 yearAngina Frequency Score at Baseline was used as reference. Not all participants fully completed the questionnaire, therefore data were collected as presented below.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCumulative Radiation Exposure From All Cardiovascular Procedures (12 M), MilliSievert (mSv)1 year
In instances in which sufficient information required to assess actual dose is not available, data were imputed. For CCTA and nuclear imaging missing values were imputed based on distribution of data from participants. Cumulative radiation exposure from additional cardiac testing and procedures during the entire follow-up period were also collected or estimated based on accepted average exposures. Given high missingness in catheterization data, a fixed estimate of 6.6 mSv and 4.1 mSv was used.
mSvMEAN

Results by group36

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Primary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive DiseasePrecision Strategy (PS)Primary Composite End Point44number of events
Primary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive DiseaseUsual Testing (UT)Primary Composite End Point118number of events
Primary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive DiseasePrecision Strategy (PS)Death or Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (first event only)18number of events
Primary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive DiseaseUsual Testing (UT)Death or Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (first event only)12number of events
Primary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive DiseasePrecision Strategy (PS)Death from any cause5number of events
Primary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive DiseaseUsual Testing (UT)Death from any cause7number of events
Primary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive DiseasePrecision Strategy (PS)Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction13number of events
Primary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive DiseaseUsual Testing (UT)Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction5number of events
Primary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive DiseasePrecision Strategy (PS)Invasive cardiac catheterization without Obstructive coronary disease27number of events
Primary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive DiseaseUsual Testing (UT)Invasive cardiac catheterization without Obstructive coronary disease107number of events

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPrecision Strategy (PS)1,057
Overall StudySTARTEDUsual Testing (UT)1,046
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPrecision Strategy (PS)1,057
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDUsual Testing (UT)1,046
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPrecision Strategy (PS)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDUsual Testing (UT)0

Adverse events12

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeartFlow Analysis (FFRCT) - Customer Support InvestigationsProduct IssuesPrecision Strategy (PS)01,0570
otherHeartFlow Analysis (FFRCT) - Customer Support InvestigationsProduct IssuesUsual Testing (UT)01,0460
otherMajor test and procedural complications by test typeInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsPrecision Strategy (PS)41,0574
otherMajor test and procedural complications by test typeInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsUsual Testing (UT)61,0466
otherMinor test and procedural complications by test typeInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsPrecision Strategy (PS)91,0579
otherMinor test and procedural complications by test typeInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsUsual Testing (UT)371,04637
seriousMyocardial Infarction (MI - non-fatal)Cardiac disordersPrecision Strategy (PS)131,05713
seriousMyocardial Infarction (MI - non-fatal)Cardiac disordersUsual Testing (UT)51,0465
seriousDeath from any causeCardiac disordersPrecision Strategy (PS)51,0575
seriousDeath from any causeCardiac disordersUsual Testing (UT)71,0467

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPrecision Strategy (PS)51,057
Total, all-cause mortalityUsual Testing (UT)71,046
Total, other adverse eventsPrecision Strategy (PS)131,057
Total, other adverse eventsUsual Testing (UT)431,046
Total, serious adverse eventsPrecision Strategy (PS)401,057
Total, serious adverse eventsUsual Testing (UT)301,046

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
34953768DERIVEDPubMed
37610731DERIVEDPubMed
37610768DERIVEDPubMed
39895494DERIVEDPubMed
39895495DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Precision Strategy (PS) vs Usual Testing (UT): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Precision Strategy (PS) vs Usual Testing (UT): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03702244

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03702244/results?page=2