ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03708926

Effect of Abaloparatide on Lumbar Disc Degeneration

NCT03708926, Phase 2, Withdrawn, Johns Hopkins University

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effect of Abaloparatide on Lumbar Disc Degeneration. Trials, record NCT03708926. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03708926

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effect of Abaloparatide on Lumbar Disc Degeneration
NCT number
NCT03708926
Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
0 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Conditions
Degeneration Disc Intervertebral
Interventions
Abaloparatide, Placebo
First posted
2018-10-17
Last updated
2021-04-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of participants with improvement in symptomatic or radiographic symptoms as indicated by composite score aggregated from the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Pfirrmann grading system6 months
Composite score will be graded as a score of 0, 1 or 2, whereas: * 0 (no improvement) = less than 15 point score improvement on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and less than 1 grade improvement on Pfirrmann grading system. * 1 (some improvement - symptomatic or radiographic) = 15 point or greater improvement on ODI score OR at least 1 grade improvement on Pfirrmann grading system. * 2 (definite improvement) = 15 point or greater improvement on ODI score AND 1 grade or greater improvement on Pfirrmann grading system. ODI is scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse disability. A decrease in ODI of 15 points is considered a clinically (symptomatic) meaningful improvement by the FDA. The modified Pfirrmann Grading system is an MRI based score (radiographic) of disc degeneration on a scale of 1-8, with higher scores indicating more severe degeneration, such that improvement is by decreasing score.
SecondaryChange in disability as assessed by ODIBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The efficacy of abaloparatide on disability will be assessed by absolute difference in ODI from baseline in abaloparatide versus placebo group, reported as average per group. ODI assessed pain related disability is scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse disability.
SecondaryChange in clinically significant improvement in disability as assessed by ODIBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The efficacy of abaloparatide on disability will be assessed by percentage of patients with 15 point or greater improvement in ODI from baseline in abaloparatide versus placebo group. ODI assessed pain related disability is scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse disability. A decrease in ODI of 15 points is considered a clinically meaningful improvement by the FDA.
SecondaryChange in pain as assessed by pain numerical rating scaleBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The efficacy of abaloparatide on disability will be assessed by absolute difference in pain numerical rating scale from baseline in abaloparatide versus placebo group, reported as average per group. The pain numerical rating scale assesses pain intensity on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores indicating worse pain.
SecondaryChange in disability as assessed by PROMIS-29 scoreBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The efficacy of abaloparatide on disability will be assessed by absolute change in PROMIS-29 score from baseline in abaloparatide versus placebo group, reported as average per group. The PROMIS-29 is a multi-dimensional quality of life instrument that assesses pain, physical function, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, and social participation on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating more disturbances of that dimension.
SecondaryChange in radiographic markers of Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) as assessed by absolute difference in Pfirrmann Grading systemBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The efficacy of abaloparatide on changes in radiographic markers of DDD will be assessed by absolute difference in modified Pfirrmann Grading system from baseline, reported as average per group. The modified Pfirrmann Grading system is an MRI based score of disc degeneration on a scale of 1-8, with higher scores indicating more severe degeneration.
SecondaryChange in radiographic markers of DDD as assessed by improvement in Pfirrmann Grading systemBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The efficacy of abaloparatide on radiographic markers of DDD will be evaluated using the percentage of patients with 1 grade or greater improvement in modified Pfirrmann Grading system from baseline in the abaloparatide versus placebo group. The modified Pfirrmann Grading system is an MRI based score of disc degeneration on a scale of 1-8, with higher scores indicating more severe degeneration.
SecondaryChange in radiographic markers of DDD as assessed by average absolute difference in Modic scoreBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The efficacy of abaloparatide on radiographic markers of DDD will be assessed by absolute difference in Modic Score from baseline, reported as average per group. Modic score is an MRI based score characterizing the vertebral endplate. Modic score correlates with progressive degenerative changes in the endplate, where 0 = normal; 1= hypervascular; 2 = fatty infiltration; 3 = sclerosis.
SecondaryChange in radiographic markers of DDD as assessed by Modic scoreBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The efficacy of abaloparatide on radiographic markers of DDD will be evaluated using percentage of patients with 1 grade or greater improvement in Modic Score from baseline in the abaloparatide versus placebo group. Modic score is an MRI based score characterizing the vertebral endplate. Modic score correlates with progressive degenerative changes in the endplate, where 0 = normal; 1= hypervascular; 2 = fatty infiltration; 3 = sclerosis.
SecondaryChange in pain management based on analgesic usageBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Evaluate change in pain management in abaloparatide versus placebo groups based on change in the dosage of analgesic used and the number of days of back pain (longer than 30 min/day) in week prior to baseline compared to week prior to 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03708926

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03708926/registered