ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03724942

Brexpiprazole for the Long-term Treatment of Patients With Agitation Associated With Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type

NCT03724942, Phase 3, Completed, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; results first posted 2024-09-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Brexpiprazole for the Long-term Treatment of Patients With Agitation Associated With Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type. Trials, record NCT03724942. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03724942

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Brexpiprazole for the Long-term Treatment of Patients With Agitation Associated With Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type
NCT number
NCT03724942
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
164 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Conditions
Agitation Associated With Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type
Interventions
Brexpiprazole
First posted
2018-10-30
Last updated
2024-09-19
Results first posted
2024-09-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryThe Frequency of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From baseline to week 14
This trial enrolled subjects rolled over from Trial 331-102-00088, and the safety of brexpiprazole when administered for a maximum of 24 weeks (including the treatment period of Trial 331-102-00088) was evaluated.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Score at 14 Weeks After DosingBaseline and 14 weeks after dosing
The CMAI assessed the frequency of agitated behaviors in elderly persons, such as hitting, cursing, and restlessness. It consisted of 29 items all rated on a 1 to 7 scale with 1 being the "best" rating and 7 being the "worst" rating. The minimum possible CMAI total score was 29, and the maximum possible CMAI total score was 203. A decrease in score indicated improvement in symptoms.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 14 Weeks After Dosing.Baseline and 14 weeks after dosing.
The CGI-S was used to rate the severity of agitation. Scores were: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. A decrease in score indicated improvement in symptoms.
SecondaryClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at 14 Weeks After Dosing14 weeks after dosing.
The CGI-I Scale was clinician-rated scale which assessed the total improvement of the patient's condition compared to that at baseline. Scores range from 0 to 7: 0 = Not assessed, 1= Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3= Minimally improved, 4= No change, 5= Minimally worse, 6= Much worse, 7= Very much worse. Higher scores indicate worse condition.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYThe Frequency of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From baseline to week 14The safety analysis set comprised subjects who have received at least 1 dose of the IMP.Percentage of percipitanteNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Score at 14 Weeks After DosingBaseline and 14 weeks after dosing
The efficacy analysis set will comprise subjects who have received at least 1 dose of the IMP and from whom CMAI total scores have been obtained at baseline and at least 1 time point after initiation of treatment.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 14 Weeks After Dosing.Baseline and 14 weeks after dosing.
The efficacy analysis set will comprise subjects who have received at least 1 dose of the IMP and from whom CMAI total scores have been obtained at baseline and at least 1 time point after initiation of treatment.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at 14 Weeks After Dosing14 weeks after dosing.
The efficacy analysis set will comprise subjects who have received at least 1 dose of the IMP and from whom CMAI total scores have been obtained at baseline and at least 1 time point after initiation of treatment.
Units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
The Frequency of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)ROLLOVER BREX90.2Percentage of percipitante
The Frequency of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)ROLLOVER PLACEBO90.3Percentage of percipitante
Mean Change From Baseline in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Score at 14 Weeks After DosingROLLOVER BREX-2.5Standard Deviation 9.9Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Score at 14 Weeks After DosingROLLOVER PLACEBO-6.4Standard Deviation 9.3Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 14 Weeks After Dosing.ROLLOVER BREX-0.2Standard Deviation 0.8Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 14 Weeks After Dosing.ROLLOVER PLACEBO-0.4Standard Deviation 1.1Units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at 14 Weeks After DosingROLLOVER BREX3.1Standard Deviation 1.2Units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at 14 Weeks After DosingROLLOVER PLACEBO2.7Standard Deviation 1.1Units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDROLLOVER BREX102
Overall StudySTARTEDROLLOVER PLACEBO62
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDROLLOVER BREX73
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDROLLOVER PLACEBO44
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDROLLOVER BREX29
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDROLLOVER PLACEBO18

Adverse events128

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDry eyeEye disordersROLLOVER BREX0102
otherDry eyeEye disordersROLLOVER PLACEBO262
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersROLLOVER BREX8102
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersROLLOVER PLACEBO362
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersROLLOVER BREX2102
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersROLLOVER PLACEBO262
otherSalivary hypersecretionGastrointestinal disordersROLLOVER BREX6102
otherSalivary hypersecretionGastrointestinal disordersROLLOVER PLACEBO462
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersROLLOVER BREX1102
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersROLLOVER PLACEBO262

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityROLLOVER BREX0102
Total, all-cause mortalityROLLOVER PLACEBO162
Total, other adverse eventsROLLOVER BREX90102
Total, other adverse eventsROLLOVER PLACEBO5562
Total, serious adverse eventsROLLOVER BREX7102
Total, serious adverse eventsROLLOVER PLACEBO462

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
40290781DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
ROLLOVER BREX vs ROLLOVER PLACEBO: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
ROLLOVER BREX vs ROLLOVER PLACEBO: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03724942

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03724942/events?page=2