ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03734562

Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Substrate Ablation of Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia

NCT03734562, Not applicable, Completed, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Substrate Ablation of Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia. Trials, record NCT03734562. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03734562

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Substrate Ablation of Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia
NCT number
NCT03734562
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
180 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Conditions
Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia
Interventions
Ablation, Antiarrhythmic drug
First posted
2018-11-08
Last updated
2019-03-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOccurrence of death from cardiovascular causes.2 years
\- Cause of death will be established by evaluation of medical records by an endpoints adjudication committee. Cardiovascular death includes: sudden death, death due to worsening heart failure or death due to myocardial infarction
PrimaryOccurrence of appropriate shocks for VT/VF2 years
Occurrence of appropriate shocks for VT/VF VT is measured by ICD interrogation, which is routinely done at the following follow-up visits: after the VT ablation procedure, or in case of suspected arrhythmic symptoms (palpitations, syncope or presyncope).
PrimaryOccurrence of hospitalization for heart failure2 years\- Hospitalization for heart failure requiring overnight hospital stay and either increased oral diuretics or intravenous diuretics (at least 40 mg od frusemide or 10 mg od torasemide).
PrimaryOccurrence of severe complication of the ablation procedure.2 yearsOccurrence of severe complications of the ablation procedure Will be identified through review of patient clinical reports
PrimaryOccurrence of interruption of antiarrhythmic drug therapy due to severe side effects2 yearsOccurrence of severe complications of the ablation procedure Will be identified through review of patient clinical reports
SecondaryNumber of patients with appropriate ICD therapies2 years
Occurrence of appropriate ICD therapies is measured by ICD interrogation, which is routinely done at the following follow-up visits: after the VT ablation procedure, or in case of suspected arrhythmic symptoms (palpitations, syncope or presyncope). Appropriateness of ICD therapies is established by device-stored electrogram analysis performed by two expert independent electrophysiologists
SecondaryNumber of patients with inappropriate ICD therapies2 years
Occurrence of ICD therapies is measured by ICD interrogation, which is routinely done at the following follow-up visits: after the VT ablation procedure, or in case of suspected arrhythmic symptoms (palpitations, syncope or presyncope). Appropriateness of ICD therapies is established by device-stored electrogram analysis performed by two expert independent electrophysiologists
SecondaryNumber of patients with appropriate ICD shocks2 years
Occurrence of ICD shocks is measured by ICD interrogation, which is routinely done at the following follow-up visits: after the VT ablation procedure, or in case of suspected arrhythmic symptoms (palpitations, syncope or presyncope). Appropriateness of ICD shocks is established by device-stored electrogram analysis performed by two expert independent electrophysiologists
SecondaryNumber of patients with inappropriate ICD shocks2 years
Occurrence of ICD shocks is measured by ICD interrogation, which is routinely done at the following follow-up visits: after the VT ablation procedure, or in case of suspected arrhythmic symptoms (palpitations, syncope or presyncope). Appropriateness of ICD shocks is established by device-stored electrogram analysis performed by two expert independent electrophysiologists
SecondaryQuality of life measured with the The Short Form (36) Health Survey2 years
Quality of life is measured with the The Short Form (36) Health Survey at pre-specified study follow-up visits (3,6,12,24 months). The short-form (36) health survey consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
35422240DERIVEDPubMed
37366571DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03734562

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03734562/registered