Trial · NCT03740165
Registered outcomes22
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 20 of 22
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by the Investigator in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Tumors (Combined Positive Score [CPS]≥10) | Up to approximately 67 months | PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on Investigator assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator will be reported for participants with PD-L1 positive tumors (CPS≥10). PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Primary | PFS Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by the Investigator in All Participants | Up to approximately 67 months | PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on Investigator assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator will be reported for all participants. PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS ≥ 10) | Up to approximately 67 months | OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to death due to any cause. The OS is reported for all participants with PD-L1 positive tumors (CPS≥10). The OS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | OS in All Participants | Up to approximately 67 months | OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to death due to any cause. The OS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | PFS Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10) | Up to approximately 66 months | PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central review assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review will be reported for participants with PD-L1 positive (CPS≥10) tumors (CPS≥10). PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | PFS Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in All Participants | Up to approximately 66 months | PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central review assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review will be reported for all participants. PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | PFS After Second-line Treatment (PFS2) Following Discontinuation of Study Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10) | Up to approximately 67 months | PFS2 is defined as the time from randomization until PD after second-line treatment per RECIST 1.1 based on Investigator assessment, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS2 per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator is reported for participants with PD-L1 positive tumors (CPS≥10). PFS2 was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | PFS2 Following Discontinuation of Study Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator in All Participants | Up to approximately 67 months | PFS2 is defined as the time from randomization until PD after second-line treatment per RECIST 1.1 based on Investigator assessment, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS2 per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator is reported for all participants. PFS2 was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) and Quality of Life (Item 30) (GHS/QoL) Combined Score | Baseline and week 45 | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the Global Health Status (GHS) question "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" (Item 29) and the Quality of Life (QoL) question "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" (Item 30) were scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor; 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized so scores ranged from 0 to 100; higher score = better outcome. Change from baseline to Week 45 in EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 combined scores was calculated based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) with scores as response variable; covariates for treatment by time interaction and stratification factors (debulking surgery \[planned interval vs R0 following primary vs R1 following primary\], and bevacizumab use \[Yes vs No\], and PD-L1 CPS \[\<10 vs ≥10\]). |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal and Gastrointestinal (Abdominal/GI) Symptoms Score Using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Ovarian Cancer (QLQ-OV28) Abdominal/GI Symptom Scale | Baseline and week 45 | Participant responses to 6 questions from the EORTC QoL Questionnaire-Ovarian Cancer (QLQ-OV28) abdominal/GI symptom scale about abdominal pain, bloated feeling in abdomen/stomach, changes in clothing fit, changes in bowel habit, flatulence, and stomach fullness when eating (questions 31-36) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all; 4=Very much); lower score = better abdominal/GI symptoms. Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a lower score indicating a better overall outcome. Change from baseline to Week 45 in EORTC QLQ-OV28 Items 31-36 combined scores was calculated based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with scores as response variable; covariates for treatment by time interaction and stratification factors (debulking surgery \[planned interval vs R0 following primary vs R1 following primary\], and bevacizumab use \[Yes vs No\], and PD-L1 CPS \[\<10 vs ≥10\]). |
| Secondary | Time to Deterioration (TTD) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) and Quality of Life (Item 30) Combined Score | Up to approximately 31 months | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the Global Health Status (GHS) question "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" (Item 29) and the Quality of Life (QoL) question "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" (Item 30) were scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor; 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized so scores ranged from 0 to 100; higher score = better outcome. TTD is defined as the time from the first EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 combined scores to deterioration (defined as ≥10-point decrease in GHS/QoL score from baseline with confirmation under right-censoring rule \[the last observation\]) or death, whichever occurs first. TTD was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | Time to Deterioration (TTD) of Abdominal/GI Symptoms Using EORTC QLQ-OV28 | Up to approximately 31 months | Participant responses to 6 questions from the EORTC QoL Questionnaire-Ovarian Cancer (QLQ-OV28) abdominal/GI symptom scale about abdominal pain, bloated feeling in abdomen/stomach, changes in clothing fit, changes in bowel habit, flatulence, and stomach fullness when eating (questions 31-36) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all; 4=Very much); lower score = better abdominal/GI symptoms. Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a lower score indicating a better overall outcome. TTD is defined as the time from the first EORTC QLQ-OV28 questions 31-36 combined scores to deterioration (defined as ≥10-point decrease in abdominal/GI symptoms score from baseline with confirmation under right-censoring rule \[the last observation\]) or death, whichever occurs first. TTD was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | Time to First Subsequent Anti-cancer Treatment (TFST) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10) | Up to approximately 67 months | TFST is defined as the time from randomization to initiation of first subsequent anti-cancer treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TFST was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | Time to First Subsequent Anti-cancer Treatment (TFST) in All Participants | Up to approximately 67 months | TFST is defined as the time from randomization to initiation of first subsequent anti-cancer treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TFST was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | Time to Second Subsequent Anti-cancer Treatment (TSST) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10) | Up to approximately 67 months | TSST is defined as the time from randomization to initiation of second subsequent anti-cancer treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TSST was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | Time to Second Subsequent Anti-cancer Treatment (TSST) in All Participants | Up to approximately 67 months | TSST is defined as the time from randomization to initiation of second subsequent anti-cancer treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TSST was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | Time to Discontinuation of Study Treatment or Death (TDT) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10) | Up to approximately 67 months | TDT is defined as the time from the date of randomization to discontinuation of study treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TDT was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | Time to Discontinuation of Study Treatment or Death (TDT) in All Participants | Up to approximately 67 months | TDT is defined as the time from the date of randomization to discontinuation of study treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TDT was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. |
| Secondary | Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10) | Up to approximately 21 months | pCR is defined as the disappearance of all known disease noted prior to surgery; all surgical specimens collected during the interval debulking surgery are microscopically negative for malignancy. The percentage of participants who experience pCR was determined based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method stratified by Bevacizumab use (yes versus no). |
| Secondary | Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate in All Participants | Up to approximately 26 months | pCR is defined as the disappearance of all known disease noted prior to surgery; all surgical specimens collected during the interval debulking surgery are microscopically negative for malignancy. The percentage of participants who experience pCR was determined based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method stratified by Bevacizumab use (yes versus no) and PD-L1 status (CPS \<10 versus CPS\>=10). |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03740165/registered