ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03772587

A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of M281 Administered to Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

NCT03772587, Phase 2, Completed, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; results first posted 2021-10-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of M281 Administered to Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis. Trials, record NCT03772587. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03772587

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of M281 Administered to Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
NCT number
NCT03772587
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
68 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conditions
Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Interventions
M281, Placebo
First posted
2018-12-11
Last updated
2023-06-27
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2018-002247-28
Results first posted
2021-10-27
Limitations and caveats
Limitations to this study include the small sample sizes of each treatment arm and the study activity disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, especially the missed Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) assessments which hampered the analysis of the endpoint.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityUp to Day 113
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. TEAE are defined as any AE occurring during or after the initiation of the first infusion of study drug.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to Day 113
An AE is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. TEAEs are defined as any AE occurring during or after the initiation of the first infusion of study drug. An SAE is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that results in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening AE, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Up to Day 113
An AE is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. TEAEs are defined as any AE occurring during or after the initiation of the first infusion of study drug. For this study, any common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or higher event of severe infection or hypoalbuminemia was considered as AESI.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Day 57 in the Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Total ScoreBaseline to Day 57
The MG-ADL was used to assess the participant's MG symptom severity. It assesses eight functions (talking, chewing, swallowing, breathing, impairment of ability to brush teeth or comb hair, impairment of ability to arise from a chair, double vision, and eyelid droop) which were rated on a 4-point scale: 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). The total score is the sum of the eight function scores and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater symptom severity/difficulty in performing daily living activities.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score as a Function of Total Serum Immunoglobulin G (IgG) at Day 57Baseline and Day 57
Estimate of additional change from baseline in MG-ADL total score for every 10 percent (%) additional reduction in IgG based on a linear regression of change from baseline in MG-ADL total score on percent reduction in IgG at Day 57. The MG-ADL was used to assess the participant's MG symptom severity. It assesses eight functions (talking, chewing, swallowing, breathing, impairment of ability to brush teeth or comb hair, impairment of ability to arise from a chair, double vision, and eyelid droop) which were rated on a 4-point scale: 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). The total score is the sum of the eight function scores and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater symptom severity/difficulty in performing daily living activities.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score as a Response to Percent Change in Total Serum IgG, for Participants Positive for Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (Anti-AChR) Antibodies, at Day 57Baseline and Day 57
Estimate of additional change from baseline in MG-ADL total score for every 10% additional reduction in IgG based on a linear regression of change from baseline in MG-ADL total score on percent reduction in IgG at Day 57 in anti-AChR positive participants. The MG-ADL was used to assess participant's MG symptom severity. It assesses eight functions (talking, chewing, swallowing, breathing, impairment of ability to brush teeth or comb hair, impairment of ability to arise from a chair, double vision, and eyelid droop) which were rated on a 4-point scale: 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). Total score is sum of eight function scores and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater symptom severity/difficulty in performing daily living activities.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score as a Function of Total Serum IgG at Day 57Baseline and Day 57
Estimate of additional change from baseline in QMG total score for every 10% additional reduction in IgG based on a linear regression of change from baseline in QMG total score on percent reduction in IgG at Day 57. The QMG test was used to assess the participant's strength. The quantitative results of each of the 13 strength components were mapped to a 4-point scale where 0 equals to (=) none, 1= mild, 2= moderate and 3= severe. The total score is the sum of the 13 scale scores and ranges from 0 to 39. Higher scores indicated more severe impairment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total QMG Score as a Response to Percent Change in Total Serum IgG, for Participants Positive for Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (Anti-AChR) Antibodies, at Day 57Baseline and Day 57
Estimate of additional change from baseline in QMG total score for every 10% additional reduction in IgG based on a linear regression of change from baseline in QMG total score on percent reduction in IgG at Day 57 in anti-AChR positive participants. The QMG test was used to assess the participant's strength. The quantitative results of each of the 13 strength components were mapped to a 4-point scale where 0 equals to (=) none, 1= mild, 2= moderate and 3= severe. The total score is the sum of the 13 scale scores and ranges from 0 to 39. Higher scores indicated more severe impairment.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score at Day 57Day 57
The MG-ADL was used to assess the participant's MG symptom severity. It assesses eight functions (talking, chewing, swallowing, breathing, impairment of ability to brush teeth or comb hair, impairment of ability to arise from a chair, double vision, and eyelid droop) which were rated on a 4-point scale: 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). The total score is the sum of the eight function scores and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater symptom severity/difficulty in performing daily living activities.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total QMG Score at Day 57Baseline and Day 57
The QMG test was used to assess the participant's strength. The quantitative results of each of the 13 strength components were mapped to a 4-point scale where 0 equals to (=) none, 1= mild, 2= moderate and 3= severe. The total score is the sum of the 13 scale scores and ranges from 0 to 39. Higher scores indicated more severe impairment.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityUp to Day 113The safety population included all participants who received any amount of nipocalimab or placebo.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to Day 113The safety population included all participants who received any amount of nipocalimab or placebo.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Up to Day 113The safety population included all participants who received any amount of nipocalimab or placebo.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Day 57 in the Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Total ScoreBaseline to Day 57Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure (OM).score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score as a Function of Total Serum Immunoglobulin G (IgG) at Day 57Baseline and Day 57
All participants over all arms with both an MG-ADL score and an IgG result at both baseline and Day 57 are included in the analysis. Participants are combined over all groups because the analysis correlates MG-ADL change with IgG change and arm was not included as a factor in the pre-specified analysis. Therefore, results by arm are not available.
score on a scale per 10% IgG reductionLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score as a Response to Percent Change in Total Serum IgG, for Participants Positive for Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (Anti-AChR) Antibodies, at Day 57Baseline and Day 57
All anti-AChR positive participants over all arms with both an MG-ADL score and an IgG result at both baseline and Day 57 are included in the analysis. Participants are combined over all groups because the analysis correlates MG-ADL change with IgG change and arm was not included as a factor in the pre-specified analysis. Therefore, results by arm are not available.
score on a scale per 10% IgG reductionLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score as a Function of Total Serum IgG at Day 57Baseline and Day 57
All participants over all arms with both an QMG score and an IgG result at both baseline and Day 57 are included in the analysis. Participants are combined over all groups because the analysis correlates QMG change with IgG change and arm was not included as a factor in the pre-specified analysis. Therefore, results by arm are not available.
score on a scale per 10% IgG reductionLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total QMG Score as a Response to Percent Change in Total Serum IgG, for Participants Positive for Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (Anti-AChR) Antibodies, at Day 57Baseline and Day 57
All anti-AChR positive participants over all arms with both an QMG score and an IgG result at both baseline and Day 57 are included in the analysis. Participants are combined over all groups because the analysis correlates QMG change with IgG change and arm was not included as a factor in the pre-specified analysis. Therefore, results by arm are not available.
score on a scale per 10% IgG reductionLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score at Day 57Day 57Population analyzed included ITT participants for whom data was available at Day 57.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total QMG Score at Day 57Baseline and Day 57ITT population included all randomized participants. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) included all participants who were evaluated for this OM.score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group206

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityPlacebo11Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityNipocalimab 5 Milligrams/Kilogram (mg/kg)12Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityNipocalimab 30 mg/kg9Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityNipocalimab 60 mg/kg12Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityNipocalimab 60 mg/kg (Q2W)12Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Placebo2Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Nipocalimab 5 mg/kg0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Nipocalimab 30 mg/kg1Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Nipocalimab 60 mg/kg0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Nipocalimab 60 mg/kg (Q2W)0Participants

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo14
Overall StudySTARTEDNipocalimab (M281) 5 Milligrams/Kilogram (mg/kg)14
Overall StudySTARTEDNipocalimab 30 mg/kg13
Overall StudySTARTEDNipocalimab 60 mg/kg13
Overall StudySTARTEDNipocalimab 60 mg/kg (Q2W)14
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo13
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNipocalimab (M281) 5 Milligrams/Kilogram (mg/kg)14
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNipocalimab 30 mg/kg12
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNipocalimab 60 mg/kg12
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNipocalimab 60 mg/kg (Q2W)14

Adverse events525

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherIron Deficiency AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo114
otherIron Deficiency AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNipocalimab 5 Milligrams/Kilogram (mg/kg)014
otherIron Deficiency AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNipocalimab 30 mg/kg013
otherIron Deficiency AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNipocalimab 60 mg/kg113
otherIron Deficiency AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNipocalimab 60 mg/kg (Q2W)014
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo014
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNipocalimab 5 Milligrams/Kilogram (mg/kg)014
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNipocalimab 30 mg/kg013
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNipocalimab 60 mg/kg013
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNipocalimab 60 mg/kg (Q2W)114

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo014
Total, all-cause mortalityNipocalimab 5 Milligrams/Kilogram (mg/kg)014
Total, all-cause mortalityNipocalimab 30 mg/kg013
Total, all-cause mortalityNipocalimab 60 mg/kg013
Total, all-cause mortalityNipocalimab 60 mg/kg (Q2W)014
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1014
Total, other adverse eventsNipocalimab 5 Milligrams/Kilogram (mg/kg)1214
Total, other adverse eventsNipocalimab 30 mg/kg813
Total, other adverse eventsNipocalimab 60 mg/kg1213
Total, other adverse eventsNipocalimab 60 mg/kg (Q2W)1214

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
38165333DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03772587

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03772587/results?page=2