ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03793010

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FX006 in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis

NCT03793010, Phase 3, Terminated, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc; results first posted 2020-09-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FX006 in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis. Trials, record NCT03793010. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03793010

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FX006 in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis
NCT number
NCT03793010
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
70 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Conditions
Osteoarthritis, Hip
Interventions
FX006, Normal saline
First posted
2019-01-04
Last updated
2024-01-24
Results first posted
2020-09-14
Limitations and caveats
This study was terminated early by the Sponsor due to occurrences of incomplete study drug administration. Only 15% of the planned study population had enrolled and no statistical evaluations reported due to insufficient sample size.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in WOMAC A (Pain) Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
The change from baseline on the average Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) A (pain) score at Week 12. The average WOMAC A score is calculated by taking the average of five questions with a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain).
SecondaryChange in WOMAC C (Function) Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change from Baseline on the WOMAC C (function) score at Week 12. The average WOMAC C score is calculated by taking the average of seventeen questions with a range from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty).
SecondaryPGIC Score at Week 1212 WeeksPGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) at Week 12. The PGIC score has a range from 1(very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) and indicates the overall status of the patient since baseline.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in WOMAC A (Pain) Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
All patients who received a full dose of study drug assigned to the FX006 32 mg arm and the placebo arm were included in the analysis. 68 total patients were included in the safety analysis. 55 of 68 patients had Week 12 assessments and are included in the primary and secondary outcomes analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in WOMAC C (Function) Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
All patients who received a full dose of study drug assigned to the FX006 32 mg arm and the placebo arm were included in the analysis. 68 total patients were included in the safety population. 55 of 68 patients had week 12 assessments and are included in the primary and secondary outcomes analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPGIC Score at Week 1212 Weeks
All patients who received a full dose of study drug assigned to the FX006 32 mg arm and the placebo arm were included in the analysis. 68 total patients were included in the safety population. 55 of 68 patients had week 12 assessments and are included in the primary and secondary outcomes analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group6

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in WOMAC A (Pain) Score at Week 12FX006-1.8595% Confidence Interval -2.99 to -0.71score on a scale
Change in WOMAC A (Pain) Score at Week 12Normal Saline-2.1695% Confidence Interval -3.22 to -1.09score on a scale
Change in WOMAC C (Function) Score at Week 12FX006-1.5695% Confidence Interval -2.73 to -0.40score on a scale
Change in WOMAC C (Function) Score at Week 12Normal Saline-2.1695% Confidence Interval -3.30 to -1.03score on a scale
PGIC Score at Week 12FX0063.495% Confidence Interval 2.7 to 4.1score on a scale
PGIC Score at Week 12Normal Saline3.495% Confidence Interval 2.8 to 4.1score on a scale

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFX00635
Overall StudySTARTEDNormal Saline35
Overall StudyRandomized But Not DosedFX0062
Overall StudyRandomized But Not DosedNormal Saline0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFX0067
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNormal Saline8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFX00628
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNormal Saline27

Adverse events82

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFX006133
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNormal Saline035
otherDry MouthGastrointestinal disordersFX006133
otherDry MouthGastrointestinal disordersNormal Saline035
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersFX006033
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersNormal Saline135
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersFX006233
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersNormal Saline035
otherPeptic UlcerGastrointestinal disordersFX006033
otherPeptic UlcerGastrointestinal disordersNormal Saline135

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFX006033
Total, all-cause mortalityNormal Saline035
Total, other adverse eventsFX0062133
Total, other adverse eventsNormal Saline1435
Total, serious adverse eventsFX006033
Total, serious adverse eventsNormal Saline035

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
FX006 vs Normal Saline: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
FX006 vs Normal Saline: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03793010

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03793010/events?page=2