ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03798366

A Clinical Study to Test How Effective and Safe GLPG1690 is for Participants With Systemic Sclerosis

NCT03798366, Phase 2, Completed, Lakefront Biotherapeutics NV; results first posted 2021-05-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Clinical Study to Test How Effective and Safe GLPG1690 is for Participants With Systemic Sclerosis. Trials, record NCT03798366. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03798366

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Clinical Study to Test How Effective and Safe GLPG1690 is for Participants With Systemic Sclerosis
NCT number
NCT03798366
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
33 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Lakefront Biotherapeutics NV
Conditions
Systemic Sclerosis
Interventions
GLPG1690, Placebo
First posted
2019-01-09
Last updated
2021-05-04
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2018-001817-33
Results first posted
2021-05-04
Limitations and caveats
This was a proof-of-concept study not sized or powered to confirm any treatment effect.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in mRSS at Week 4Baseline, Week 4
The mRSS is a validated physical examination method for estimating skin thickness. The 17 body site mRSS was used, with each body site assessed on a scale of 0 (uninvolved) to 3 (severe thickening) with a total score range from 0 (best) to 51 (worst), with higher scores indicating greater severity of skin thickening.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in mRSS at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
The mRSS is a validated physical examination method for estimating skin thickness. The 17 body site mRSS was used, with each body site assessed on a scale of 0 (uninvolved) to 3 (severe thickening) with a total score range from 0 (best) to 51 (worst), with higher scores indicating greater severity of skin thickening.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in mRSS at Week 16Baseline, Week 16
The mRSS is a validated physical examination method for estimating skin thickness. The 17 body site mRSS was used, with each body site assessed on a scale of 0 (uninvolved) to 3 (severe thickening) with a total score range from 0 (best) to 51 (worst), with higher scores indicating greater severity of skin thickening.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in mRSS at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
The mRSS is a validated physical examination method for estimating skin thickness. The 17 body site mRSS was used, with each body site assessed on a scale of 0 (uninvolved) to 3 (severe thickening) with a total score range from 0 (best) to 51 (worst), with higher scores indicating greater severity of skin thickening.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsBaseline up to end of the study (36 weeks)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is any AE with an onset date on or after the start of stud drug intake and no later than 30 days after last dose of study drug, or any worsening of any AE on or after the start of stud drug intake. A serious AE was defined as an AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was medically significant.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in mRSS at Week 4Baseline, Week 4Participants in the FAS were analyzed.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in mRSS at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Participants in the FAS were analyzed.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in mRSS at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Participants in the FAS were analyzed.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in mRSS at Week 24Baseline, Week 24Participants in the FAS were analyzed.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsBaseline up to end of the study (36 weeks)Safety analysis set consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in mRSS at Week 4GLPG1690 600 mg-2.2Standard Error 0.85units on a scale
Change From Baseline in mRSS at Week 4Placebo-1.6Standard Error 1.04units on a scale
Change From Baseline in mRSS at Week 8GLPG1690 600 mg-3.2Standard Error 0.85units on a scale
Change From Baseline in mRSS at Week 8Placebo-2.5Standard Error 1.07units on a scale
Change From Baseline in mRSS at Week 16GLPG1690 600 mg-6.8Standard Error 0.85units on a scale
Change From Baseline in mRSS at Week 16Placebo-4.8Standard Error 1.12units on a scale
Change From Baseline in mRSS at Week 24GLPG1690 600 mg-8.9Standard Error 0.87units on a scale
Change From Baseline in mRSS at Week 24Placebo-6.0Standard Error 1.11units on a scale
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsGLPG1690 600 mgTEAEs20Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsPlaceboTEAEs11Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGLPG1690 600 mg21
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo12
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGLPG1690 600 mg21
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo11
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGLPG1690 600 mg0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo1

Adverse events200

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsGLPG1690 600 mg221
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo212
otherRhinitisInfections and infestationsGLPG1690 600 mg221
otherRhinitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo112
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsGLPG1690 600 mg321
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo012
otherCellulitisInfections and infestationsGLPG1690 600 mg221
otherCellulitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo012
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsGLPG1690 600 mg221
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPlacebo012

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGLPG1690 600 mg021
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo012
Total, other adverse eventsGLPG1690 600 mg2021
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1112
Total, serious adverse eventsGLPG1690 600 mg221
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo112

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
GLPG1690 600 mg vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
GLPG1690 600 mg vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03798366

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03798366/events?page=2