ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03805646

Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool to Followup on Discharged Trauma Patients

NCT03805646, Not applicable, Completed, University of California, Los Angeles; results first posted 2024-11-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool to Followup on Discharged Trauma Patients. Trials, record NCT03805646. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03805646

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool to Followup on Discharged Trauma Patients
NCT number
NCT03805646
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
3,990 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Conditions
Wounds and Injury
Interventions
Mobile Phone-based Triage Tool
First posted
2019-01-16
Last updated
2024-11-27
Results first posted
2024-11-27
Limitations and caveats
Early in the COVID pandemic due to restrictions in Cameroon and to ensure safety of participants, changes were made such as pausing intervention phase where patients were asked to return to the hospital for a physician exam to cross-validate the telephone triage tool and reverting to baseline. The step-wedge design was also scrapped as this was disrupted by the pause. Low recruitment numbers in COVID also accounted for the intervention phase to be extended beyond the pre-specified timeline.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of Successful Contacts2 weeks after enrollment
The number of successful contacts will be divided by the total number of contacts. A "successful" contact is when an enrolled patient answered the phone, and consented to the research assistant administering the questionnaire(s) planned for that phone call.
PrimaryMedian Number of Attempts Required to Achieve a Successful Contact2 weeks after enrollmentThis is the median number of call attempts made until a research assistant is able to successfully administer the questionnaire(s) planned for that phone call.
PrimaryMedian Cost Associated With Personnel TimeAt the end of the study (2 weeks after the 2-year intervention phase (extended due to COVID))This measure is median monthly costs incurred to pay the research assistant for the time s/he spends making the required phone calls per patient.
PrimaryMedian Cost Associated With Telephone TimeAt the end of the study (2 weeks after the 2-year intervention phase (extended due to COVID))This measure is the median costs incurred to make phone calls per patient in each study phase.
PrimaryTelephone Triage Tool Administration TimeAfter administration of the telephone triage tool (i.e. about 2 weeks after enrollment)This measure will be calculated based on how much time it takes to administer the telephone triage tool.
PrimaryPhysician Assessment of Whether a Patient Would Benefit From Further ServicesImmediately after the physician administers the physical exam (i.e. about 3 weeks after enrollment)
This is a binary measure. After a physician examines a participant, s/he will determine whether s/he thinks the participant would benefit from further services (including additional follow-up care, and/or diagnostic or therapeutic interventions).
PrimaryPhysician Assessment of Whether a Patient Was at Moderate to High Risk for a Poor Outcome (HR) Without Additional InterventionImmediately after the physician administers the physical exam (i.e. about 3 weeks after enrollment)
After a physician examines a participant, s/he will determine whether s/he thinks the participant is at low, moderate or high risk for a poor outcome (HR) without additional intervention using subjective clinical assessment.
PrimaryTriage Risk Score (TRS)At the end of intervention phase (about 1 year after enrollment).
To develop a sensitive model capable of risk stratifying triaged patients for high risk (HR), all candidate questions from the telephone triage tool found to associate with HR on univariate regression were weighted by their predictive coefficient and added to generate a triage risk score (TRS) ranging from a minimum score of 0 (lowest risk) to a maximum possible score of 43.9 (highest risk). Triage Risk Score (TRS) less than or equal to 1.3 (1st quartile) was designated as low risk, TRS 1.4 to 4.0 (2nd \& 3rd quartile) as moderate risk, and TRS greater than or equal to 4.1 (fourth quartile) as high risk.
PrimaryAcceptability Score of Mobile Phones as a Follow-up Tool2 weeks after enrollment
This is a numerical measure that represents the sum of the positive responses that participants give to each question that assesses the acceptability of mobile phones as a follow-up tool. The scale for the acceptability score of mobile phones as a follow-up tool ranges from 0 to 6, where 0 means the participant's responses indicate the participant believes mobile phones are definitely not an acceptable follow-up tool and 6 means the participant's responses indicate the participant believes mobile phones are definitely an acceptable follow-up tool.
PrimaryProportion of Injured Patients Who Seek Clinical Follow-up EvaluationAfter the 2week post-discharge phonecall.
This will be calculated as follows: The denominator will be the number of discharged trauma patients enrolled in the study. The numerator will be the number of discharged trauma patients enrolled in the study who seek any clinical follow-up evaluation at the 2 weeks post-discharge phonecall.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion of Successful Contacts2 weeks after enrollmentParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYMedian Number of Attempts Required to Achieve a Successful Contact2 weeks after enrollment
There was missing data for this variable hence the discrepancy between the overall number of participants analyzed for this variable and participants in the study. Missing data were dropped from the analysis.
Number of callsMEDIAN
PRIMARYMedian Cost Associated With Personnel TimeAt the end of the study (2 weeks after the 2-year intervention phase (extended due to COVID))DollarsMEDIAN
PRIMARYMedian Cost Associated With Telephone TimeAt the end of the study (2 weeks after the 2-year intervention phase (extended due to COVID))DollarsMEDIAN
PRIMARYTelephone Triage Tool Administration TimeAfter administration of the telephone triage tool (i.e. about 2 weeks after enrollment)
Telephone triage tool was the intervention and was only administered in the intervention phase. There was missing data for this variable hence the discrepancy between the overall number of participants analyzed for this variable and participants in the study. Missing data were dropped from the analysis.
secondsMEDIAN
PRIMARYPhysician Assessment of Whether a Patient Would Benefit From Further ServicesImmediately after the physician administers the physical exam (i.e. about 3 weeks after enrollment)
Physician examination occurred only in the intervention phase where participants who were administered the telephone triage tool were asked to return for a physician examination to cross-validate tool finding. The number analyzed represents the number of patients who returned for the physician examination.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPhysician Assessment of Whether a Patient Was at Moderate to High Risk for a Poor Outcome (HR) Without Additional InterventionImmediately after the physician administers the physical exam (i.e. about 3 weeks after enrollment)
Physician examination occurred only in the intervention phase where participants who were administered the telephone triage tool were asked to return for a physician examination to cross-validate tool finding. The number analyzed represents the number of patients who returned for the physician examination.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYTriage Risk Score (TRS)At the end of intervention phase (about 1 year after enrollment).The telephone triage tool was administered only in the intervention phase. The number analyzed represents the subset of patients who returned for the physician examination.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYAcceptability Score of Mobile Phones as a Follow-up Tool2 weeks after enrollmentThe acceptability tool was administered to a subset of patients.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYProportion of Injured Patients Who Seek Clinical Follow-up EvaluationAfter the 2week post-discharge phonecall.
There was missing data for this variable hence the discrepancy between the overall number of participants analyzed for this variable and participants in the study. Missing data were dropped from the analysis.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group59

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Successful ContactsNo Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool837Participants
Proportion of Successful ContactsMobile Phone-administered Triage Tool1514Participants
Median Number of Attempts Required to Achieve a Successful ContactNo Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool1Inter-Quartile Range 1 to 1Number of calls
Median Number of Attempts Required to Achieve a Successful ContactMobile Phone-administered Triage Tool1Inter-Quartile Range 1 to 1Number of calls
Median Cost Associated With Personnel TimeNo Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool3.75Inter-Quartile Range 2.21 to 4.87Dollars
Median Cost Associated With Personnel TimeMobile Phone-administered Triage Tool3.56Inter-Quartile Range 3.04 to 5.18Dollars
Median Cost Associated With Telephone TimeNo Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool2.89Inter-Quartile Range 2.42 to 4.43Dollars
Median Cost Associated With Telephone TimeMobile Phone-administered Triage Tool4.92Inter-Quartile Range 4.24 to 5.67Dollars
Telephone Triage Tool Administration TimeMobile Phone-administered Triage Tool81.5Inter-Quartile Range 48 to 146seconds
Physician Assessment of Whether a Patient Would Benefit From Further ServicesMobile Phone-administered Triage ToolYes323Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDNo Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool1,491
Overall StudySTARTEDMobile Phone-administered Triage Tool2,499
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNo Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool837
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMobile Phone-administered Triage Tool1,514
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNo Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool654
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMobile Phone-administered Triage Tool985

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityNo Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool401,491
Total, all-cause mortalityMobile Phone-administered Triage Tool492,499
Total, other adverse eventsNo Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool01,491
Total, other adverse eventsMobile Phone-administered Triage Tool02,499
Total, serious adverse eventsNo Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool01,491
Total, serious adverse eventsMobile Phone-administered Triage Tool02,499

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
No Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool vs Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool: Proportion of Injured Patients Who Seek Clinical Follow-up EvaluationTrial comparisons
No Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool vs Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool: Proportion of Successful ContactsTrial comparisons
No Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool vs Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
No Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool vs Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03805646

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03805646/results?page=2