ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03811912

Efficacy and Tolerability Study of Two Dose Regimens of CTP-543 in Adults With Alopecia Areata

NCT03811912, Phase 2, Completed, Concert Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2022-12-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Tolerability Study of Two Dose Regimens of CTP-543 in Adults With Alopecia Areata. Trials, record NCT03811912. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03811912

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Tolerability Study of Two Dose Regimens of CTP-543 in Adults With Alopecia Areata
NCT number
NCT03811912
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
57 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Concert Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Alopecia Areata
Interventions
CTP-543, CTP-543 Matching Placebo
First posted
2019-01-22
Last updated
2022-12-09
Results first posted
2022-12-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryRelative Change From Baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
The SALT is a quantitative assessment of scalp hair loss. SALT scores range in severity from 0 (no hair loss) to a maximum of 100 (complete hair loss). Relative change (percent change) to baseline is calculated as: 100 x (\[baseline SALT score - follow-up SALT score\]/baseline SALT score).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90%, 75%, and 50% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From BaselineBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The SALT is a quantitative assessment of scalp hair loss. SALT scores range in severity from 0 (no hair loss) to a maximum of 100 (complete hair loss). Percentage of participants achieving at least a 50%, 75%, 90% relative reduction in SALT score from baseline at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 are reported.
SecondaryAbsolute Change in SALT Scores From Baseline at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The SALT is a quantitative assessment of scalp hair loss. SALT scores range in severity from 0 (no hair loss) to a maximum of 100 (complete hair loss). Absolute change equals the difference in SALT measurements (baseline SALT score - follow-up SALT score).
SecondaryRelative Change in SALT Scores From Baseline at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
The SALT is a quantitative assessment of scalp hair loss. SALT scores range in severity from 0 (no hair loss) to a maximum of 100 (complete hair loss). Relative change (percent change) to baseline is calculated as: 100 x (\[baseline SALT score - follow-up SALT score\]/baseline SALT score).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Change in Satisfaction of Hair CoverageBaseline, Week 24
Participant satisfaction question was used to assess overall satisfaction with hair coverage, with responses ranging from 1 to 5, as follows: 1 (very dissatisfied), 2 (dissatisfied), 3 (somewhat satisfied), 4 (mostly satisfied), 5 (very satisfied). Higher scores indicate better satisfaction with hair coverage. The percentage of participants with change from Baseline to the Week 24 satisfaction level was reported as categories: satisfied to satisfied; satisfied to dissatisfied; dissatisfied to satisfied and dissatisfied to dissatisfied. Data is reported only for participants with change from Baseline in satisfaction level.
OtherNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety24 Weeks

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYRelative Change From Baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
Efficacy Population included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 post-treatment SALT assessment. Participants in the efficacy population were analyzed according to their randomized dosing regimen.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90%, 75%, and 50% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From BaselineBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Efficacy Population included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 post-treatment SALT assessment. Participants in the efficacy population were analyzed according to their randomized dosing regimen.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in SALT Scores From Baseline at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Efficacy Population included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 post-treatment SALT assessment. Participants in the efficacy population were analyzed according to their randomized dosing regimen.
Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYRelative Change in SALT Scores From Baseline at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
Efficacy Population included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 post-treatment SALT assessment. Participants in the efficacy population were analyzed according to their randomized dosing regimen.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Change in Satisfaction of Hair CoverageBaseline, Week 24
Efficacy Population included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 post-treatment SALT assessment. Participants in the efficacy population were analyzed according to their randomized dosing regimen.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety24 Weeks

Results by group68

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Relative Change From Baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score at Week 24CTP-543 8 mg BID46.4Standard Deviation 38.21percent change
Relative Change From Baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score at Week 24CTP-543 16 mg QD18.0Standard Deviation 32.32percent change
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90%, 75%, and 50% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From BaselineCTP-543 8 mg BID90% Reduction: Week 4090% Confidence Interval 0 to 1.7Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90%, 75%, and 50% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From BaselineCTP-543 16 mg QD90% Reduction: Week 4090% Confidence Interval 0 to 1.8Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90%, 75%, and 50% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From BaselineCTP-543 8 mg BID90% Reduction: Week 8090% Confidence Interval 0 to 1.7Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90%, 75%, and 50% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From BaselineCTP-543 16 mg QD90% Reduction: Week 8090% Confidence Interval 0 to 1.8Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90%, 75%, and 50% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From BaselineCTP-543 8 mg BID90% Reduction: Week 123.490% Confidence Interval 0 to 10.7Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90%, 75%, and 50% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From BaselineCTP-543 16 mg QD90% Reduction: Week 12090% Confidence Interval 0 to 1.8Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90%, 75%, and 50% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From BaselineCTP-543 8 mg BID90% Reduction: Week 166.990% Confidence Interval 0 to 16.4Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90%, 75%, and 50% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From BaselineCTP-543 16 mg QD90% Reduction: Week 16090% Confidence Interval 0 to 1.8Percentage of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCTP-543 8 mg BID29
Overall StudySTARTEDCTP-543 16 mg QD28
Overall StudySafety PopulationCTP-543 8 mg BID29
Overall StudySafety PopulationCTP-543 16 mg QD28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCTP-543 8 mg BID25
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCTP-543 16 mg QD26
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCTP-543 8 mg BID4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCTP-543 16 mg QD2

Adverse events24

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsCTP-543 8 mg BID529
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsCTP-543 16 mg QD528
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsCTP-543 8 mg BID529
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsCTP-543 16 mg QD328
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersCTP-543 8 mg BID329
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersCTP-543 16 mg QD128
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersCTP-543 8 mg BID229
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersCTP-543 16 mg QD028
otherAcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersCTP-543 8 mg BID429
otherAcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersCTP-543 16 mg QD428

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCTP-543 8 mg BID029
Total, all-cause mortalityCTP-543 16 mg QD028
Total, other adverse eventsCTP-543 8 mg BID2329
Total, other adverse eventsCTP-543 16 mg QD2328
Total, serious adverse eventsCTP-543 8 mg BID029
Total, serious adverse eventsCTP-543 16 mg QD028

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
CTP-543 8 mg BID vs CTP-543 16 mg QD: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
CTP-543 8 mg BID vs CTP-543 16 mg QD: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03811912

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03811912/results?page=2