ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03822832

A Study in Patients With Atopic Eczema to Test How Effective BI 655130 is and How Well it is Tolerated

NCT03822832, Phase 2, Completed, Boehringer Ingelheim; results first posted 2022-12-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study in Patients With Atopic Eczema to Test How Effective BI 655130 is and How Well it is Tolerated. Trials, record NCT03822832. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03822832

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study in Patients With Atopic Eczema to Test How Effective BI 655130 is and How Well it is Tolerated
NCT number
NCT03822832
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
51 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Conditions
Dermatitis, Atopic
Interventions
BI 655130, Placebo
First posted
2019-01-30
Last updated
2025-10-20
Results first posted
2022-12-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16Baseline (day 1) and Week 16 (day 113 ±3 days), up to 116 days.
Percentage change from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16. The EASI score assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) induration/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification, each on a scale of zero to three. The EASI score confers a maximum of 72 and evaluates two dimensions of Atopic Dermatitis (AD): disease extent and clinical signs. The suggested severity strata for the EASI are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1-1.0 = almost clear; 1.1-7.0 = mild; 7.1-21.0 = moderate; 21.1-50.0 = severe; 50.1-72.0 = very severe. Restricted maximum likelihood(REML)-based Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) including fixed, categorical effects of treatment, visit, and Asian/Non-Asian (yes/no) as well as the treatment-by-visit interaction, and continuous, fixed covariates of baseline endpoint and baseline-by-visit interaction. Unstructured covariance matrix was used.
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Drug Related Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 28 weeks, see endpoint description for more details.
Number of patients with drug related Adverse Events (AEs) reported separately in both for the double blind period as well as the re-allocation treatment period. Double blind period: Baseline (week 1) to the last study drug administration date (week 12) + Residual effects period (REP, 16 weeks). For patients who initiated the re-allocation treatment period the REP was shortened to the date of first re-allocation treatment period treatment administration. Up to a total time frame of 28 weeks. Re-allocation treatment period: Week 1 of re-allocation treatment period to the last study drug administration date (week 12 of re-allocation treatment period) + REP (16 weeks), or end-of-study date, whichever occurred earlier. Up to a total time frame of 28 weeks.
SecondaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 4Baseline (day 1) and Week 4 (day 29 ±3 days), up to 32 days.
Absolute change from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 4. The EASI score assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) induration/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification, each on a scale of zero to three. The EASI score confers a maximum of 72 and evaluates two dimensions of Atopic Dermatitis (AD): disease extent and clinical signs. The suggested severity strata for the EASI are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1-1.0 = almost clear; 1.1-7.0 = mild; 7.1-21.0 = moderate; 21.1-50.0 = severe; 50.1-72.0 = very severe. Restricted maximum likelihood(REML)-based Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) including fixed, categorical effects of treatment, visit, and Asian/Non-Asian (yes/no) as well as the treatment-by-visit interaction, and continuous, fixed covariates of baseline endpoint and baseline-by-visit interaction. Unstructured covariance matrix was used.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 4Baseline (day 1) and Week 4 (day 29 ±3 days), up to 32 days.
Percentage change from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 4. The EASI score assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) induration/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification, each on a scale of zero to three. The EASI score confers a maximum of 72 and evaluates two dimensions of Atopic Dermatitis (AD): disease extent and clinical signs. The suggested severity strata for the EASI are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1-1.0 = almost clear; 1.1-7.0 = mild; 7.1-21.0 = moderate; 21.1-50.0 = severe; 50.1-72.0 = very severe. Restricted maximum likelihood(REML)-based Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) including fixed, categorical effects of treatment, visit, and Asian/Non-Asian (yes/no) as well as the treatment-by-visit interaction, and continuous, fixed covariates of baseline endpoint and baseline-by-visit interaction. Unstructured covariance matrix was used.
SecondaryProportion of Patients With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)(EASI50) at Week 4 and 16Baseline (day 1) and Week 16 (day 113 ±3 days), up to 116 days.
Proportion of patients with a 50% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)(EASI50) at Week 4 and 16. The EASI score assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) induration/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification, each on a scale of zero to three. The EASI score confers a maximum of 72 and evaluates two dimensions of Atopic Dermatitis (AD): disease extent and clinical signs. The suggested severity strata for the EASI are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1-1.0 = almost clear; 1.1-7.0 = mild; 7.1-21.0 = moderate; 21.1-50.0 = severe; 50.1-72.0 = very severe.
SecondaryProportion of Patients With a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)(EASI75) at Week 4 and 16Baseline (day 1) and Week 16 (day 113 ±3 days), up to 116 days.
Proportion of patients with a 75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)(EASI75) at Week 4 and 16. The EASI score assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) induration/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification, each on a scale of zero to three. The EASI score confers a maximum of 72 and evaluates two dimensions of Atopic Dermatitis (AD): disease extent and clinical signs. The suggested severity strata for the EASI are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1-1.0 = almost clear; 1.1-7.0 = mild; 7.1-21.0 = moderate; 21.1-50.0 = severe; 50.1-72.0 = very severe.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 4Baseline (day 1) and Week 4 (day 29 ±3 days), up to 32 days.
SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD). Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate body surface area affected by AD. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed from none=0to severe=3. Severity scores summed to B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome. REML-based MMRM including fixed, categorical effects of treatment, visit, and Asian/Non-Asian as well as the treatment-by-visit interaction, and continuous, fixed covariates of baseline endpoint and baseline-by-visit interaction. Unstructured covariance matrix was used.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 16Baseline (day 1) and Week 16 (day 113 ±3 days), up to 116 days.
SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD). Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate body surface area affected by AD. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed from none=0to severe=3. Severity scores summed to B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome. REML-based MMRM including fixed, categorical effects of treatment, visit, and Asian/Non-Asian as well as the treatment-by-visit interaction, and continuous, fixed covariates of baseline endpoint and baseline-by-visit interaction. Unstructured covariance matrix was used.
SecondaryNumber of Patients Achieving at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 4 and 16Baseline (day 1) and Week 16 (day 113 ±3 days), up to 116 days.
Number of patients achieving at least a 2-grade reduction from baseline to clear (0) or almost clear (1) in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 4 and 16. IGA score allows investigators to assess the overall disease severity at one given time point. It is a 5-point scale with: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. The overall IGA score includes the assessment of erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, and oozing/crusting. For the first three sections the following scale will be used: "None", "Barely Perceptible" ("Minimal" for lichenification), "Slight but Definite", "Clearly Perceptible" or "Marked". For oozing/crusting the available answers are "None" or "Present."

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16Baseline (day 1) and Week 16 (day 113 ±3 days), up to 116 days.Full Analysis Set (FAS): All participants who were randomised, received at least one dose during the trial, and had a baseline measurement for the primary endpoint.Percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With Drug Related Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 28 weeks, see endpoint description for more details.
Double blind period: Safety Analysis Set (SAF): patients who were randomised, and received at least one dose during the trial.~Re-allocation treatment period: This patient set includes all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug and received study medication after re-allocation visit (i.e., after Week 16 visit).
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYAbsolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 4Baseline (day 1) and Week 4 (day 29 ±3 days), up to 32 days.Full Analysis Set (FAS): All participants who were randomised, received at least one dose during the trial, and had a baseline measurement for the primary endpoint.Change in score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 4Baseline (day 1) and Week 4 (day 29 ±3 days), up to 32 days.Full Analysis Set (FAS): All participants who were randomised, received at least one dose during the trial, and had a baseline measurement for the primary endpoint.Percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)(EASI50) at Week 4 and 16Baseline (day 1) and Week 16 (day 113 ±3 days), up to 116 days.Full Analysis Set (FAS): All participants who were randomised, received at least one dose during the trial, and had a baseline measurement for the primary endpoint.Proportion of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)(EASI75) at Week 4 and 16Baseline (day 1) and Week 16 (day 113 ±3 days), up to 116 days.Full Analysis Set (FAS): All participants who were randomised, received at least one dose during the trial, and had a baseline measurement for the primary endpoint.Proportion of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 4Baseline (day 1) and Week 4 (day 29 ±3 days), up to 32 days.Full Analysis Set (FAS): All participants who were randomised, received at least one dose during the trial, and had a baseline measurement for the primary endpoint.Change in score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 16Baseline (day 1) and Week 16 (day 113 ±3 days), up to 116 days.Full Analysis Set (FAS): All participants who were randomised, received at least one dose during the trial, and had a baseline measurement for the primary endpoint.Change in score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Achieving at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 4 and 16Baseline (day 1) and Week 16 (day 113 ±3 days), up to 116 days.Full Analysis Set (FAS): All participants who were randomised, received at least one dose during the trial, and had a baseline measurement for the primary endpoint.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16Placebo Intravenous Every 4 Weeks-12.3Standard Error 14.3Percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16Spesolimab 600 mg Intravenous Every 4 Weeks-37.9Standard Error 9.8Percent change
Number of Patients With Drug Related Adverse Events (AEs)Placebo Intravenous Every 4 WeeksDouble blind treatment period6Participants
Number of Patients With Drug Related Adverse Events (AEs)Spesolimab 600 mg Intravenous Every 4 WeeksDouble blind treatment period4Participants
Number of Patients With Drug Related Adverse Events (AEs)Placebo Intravenous Every 4 WeeksRe-allocation treatment period0Participants
Number of Patients With Drug Related Adverse Events (AEs)Spesolimab 600 mg Intravenous Every 4 WeeksRe-allocation treatment period2Participants
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 4Placebo Intravenous Every 4 Weeks-7.0Standard Error 3.0Change in score on a scale
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 4Spesolimab 600 mg Intravenous Every 4 Weeks-6.3Standard Error 2.2Change in score on a scale
Percentage Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 4Placebo Intravenous Every 4 Weeks-21.6Standard Error 11.3Percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 4Spesolimab 600 mg Intravenous Every 4 Weeks-23.8Standard Error 8.3Percent change

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Period 1 - Double Blind PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo Intravenous Every 4 Weeks18
Period 1 - Double Blind PeriodSTARTEDSpesolimab 600 mg Intravenous Every 4 Weeks33
Period 1 - Double Blind PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo Intravenous Every 4 Weeks8
Period 1 - Double Blind PeriodCOMPLETEDSpesolimab 600 mg Intravenous Every 4 Weeks22
Period 1 - Double Blind PeriodNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Intravenous Every 4 Weeks10
Period 1 - Double Blind PeriodNOT COMPLETEDSpesolimab 600 mg Intravenous Every 4 Weeks11
Re-allocationSTARTEDPlacebo Intravenous Every 4 Weeks8
Re-allocationSTARTEDSpesolimab 600 mg Intravenous Every 4 Weeks22
Re-allocationCOMPLETEDPlacebo Intravenous Every 4 Weeks6
Re-allocationCOMPLETEDSpesolimab 600 mg Intravenous Every 4 Weeks16

Adverse events108

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEye pruritusEye disordersPlacebo (Week 1-16) and if no Treatment, Week 16-28118
otherEye pruritusEye disordersSpesolimab (Week 1-16) and no Treatment (Week 16-28)033
otherEye pruritusEye disordersSpesolimab (Open Label Period, Week 16-44)022
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo (Week 1-16) and if no Treatment, Week 16-28118
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersSpesolimab (Week 1-16) and no Treatment (Week 16-28)033
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersSpesolimab (Open Label Period, Week 16-44)022
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo (Week 1-16) and if no Treatment, Week 16-28118
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersSpesolimab (Week 1-16) and no Treatment (Week 16-28)133
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersSpesolimab (Open Label Period, Week 16-44)022
otherBeta haemolytic streptococcal infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo (Week 1-16) and if no Treatment, Week 16-28118

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo (Week 1-16) and if no Treatment, Week 16-28018
Total, all-cause mortalitySpesolimab (Week 1-16) and no Treatment (Week 16-28)033
Total, all-cause mortalitySpesolimab (Open Label Period, Week 16-44)022
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo (Week 1-16) and if no Treatment, Week 16-281018
Total, other adverse eventsSpesolimab (Week 1-16) and no Treatment (Week 16-28)1633
Total, other adverse eventsSpesolimab (Open Label Period, Week 16-44)622
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo (Week 1-16) and if no Treatment, Week 16-28118
Total, serious adverse eventsSpesolimab (Week 1-16) and no Treatment (Week 16-28)333
Total, serious adverse eventsSpesolimab (Open Label Period, Week 16-44)322

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03822832

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03822832/results?page=2