ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03828019

Adalimumab vs. Conventional Immunosuppression for Uveitis Trial

NCT03828019, Phase 3, Completed, JHSPH Center for Clinical Trials; results first posted 2025-05-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Adalimumab vs. Conventional Immunosuppression for Uveitis Trial. Trials, record NCT03828019. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03828019

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Adalimumab vs. Conventional Immunosuppression for Uveitis Trial
NCT number
NCT03828019
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
227 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
JHSPH Center for Clinical Trials
Conditions
Uveitis
Interventions
Adalimumab (ADA), Conventional immunosuppression (CON)
First posted
2019-02-04
Last updated
2025-05-16
Results first posted
2025-05-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryCorticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 6 Months After Randomization6 months
Corticosteroid-sparing success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits \>= 28 days apart while on \<= 7.5 mg/day of corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid sparing between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months (primary outcome) and 12 months (secondary outcome).
SecondaryCorticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 12 Months After Randomization12 months
Corticosteroid-sparing success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits \>= 28 days apart while on \<= 7.5 mg/day of corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid sparing between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months (primary outcome) and 12 months (secondary outcome).
SecondaryCorticosteroid Discontinuation Success by 6 Months6 months
Corticosteroid discontinuation success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits \>= 28 days apart after discontinuing corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid discontinuation between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months and 12 months.
SecondaryCorticosteroid Discontinuation Success by 12 Months12 months
Corticosteroid discontinuation success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits \>= 28 days apart after discontinuing corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid discontinuation between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months and 12 months.
SecondaryCorticosteroid Exposure Over 12 Months12 monthsCorticosteroid dose was collected at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12. Mean corticosteroid dose per day was estimated with a negative binomial model at 12 months.
SecondaryBest Corrected Visual Acuity Change at 12 Months12 months
Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 12 months. Participants' visual acuity was measured by certified examiners with best refractive correction in place. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of the standard ETDRS eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until no more meaningful readings could be made and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. More letters read is associated with higher visual acuity (85 letters is 20/20 vision). Visual acuity data was collected at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12 and estimated at 12 months with a mixed model.
SecondaryMacular Edema Over 12 Months of Follow up12 months
Macular edema is defined as central retinal thickness greater than or equal to 300 micrometers as measured by a masked grader's review of OCT images. Greater retinal thickness is associated with poorer vision. Outcome measure is the odds ratio comparing macular edema at 12 months to baseline macular edema. Macular edema was measured at baseline and months 3, 6, and 12. The odds ratio at 12 months was estimated with a mixed model.
SecondaryIncidence of Infections at 12 Months12 months
Incidence of infections over 12 months of follow-up. Participants were asked about occurrences since the previous visit of infections requiring antibiotic or antiviral treatment. Data was collected at months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12. The rate of infections at 12 months was estimated with a negative binomial model.
SecondaryElevated Levels of AST or ALT (Hepatoxicity) by 12 Months.12 months
Cumulative percent of participants having elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) greater than twice the upper level of normal by 12 months. Elevated levels of AST and ALT may indicate decline in liver function. Lab values of AST and ALT were measured at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12 and the cumulative percent of participants with elevated lab values by 12 months was estimated by Kaplan Meier methods.
SecondaryElevated Creatine (Nephrotoxicity) by 12 Months12 months
Cumulative percent of participants having elevated creatine values (creatine greater than 30% above baseline or creatine \> 1.5 mg/dL) by 12 months. Increases in creatine levels may indicate decreased kidney function. Lab values of creatine were measured at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12 and the cumulative percent of participants with elevated creatine at 12 months was estimated by Kaplan Meier methods.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYCorticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 6 Months After Randomization6 monthsParticipants with follow-up data through the 6 month visit or had an event (corticosteroid sparing success) before they were lost to follow-upCumulative proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCorticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 12 Months After Randomization12 monthsParticipants with follow-up data through the 12 month visit or had an event (corticosteroid sparing success) before they were lost to follow-upCumulative proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCorticosteroid Discontinuation Success by 6 Months6 monthsParticipants with follow-up through the 6 months visit or had an event (discontinued corticosteroids) before lost to follow-upCumulative proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCorticosteroid Discontinuation Success by 12 Months12 monthsCumulative proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCorticosteroid Exposure Over 12 Months12 monthsParticipants with follow up treatment datamg/day of steroid use over 12 monthsMEAN
SECONDARYBest Corrected Visual Acuity Change at 12 Months12 monthsAll participantsStandard letters ETDRS eye chartMEAN
SECONDARYMacular Edema Over 12 Months of Follow up12 monthsParticipants with follow up retinal thickness data at enrollment and the 12 month visitOdds ratioNUMBER
SECONDARYIncidence of Infections at 12 Months12 monthsParticipants with follow up after the baseline visitNumber of infections per person yearNUMBER
SECONDARYElevated Levels of AST or ALT (Hepatoxicity) by 12 Months.12 monthsParticipants with follow-up that did not have elevated levels of AST or ALT at baselineCumulative percent of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYElevated Creatine (Nephrotoxicity) by 12 Months12 monthsParticipants with follow-up that did not have elevated creatine at the time of enrollmentCumulative percent of participantsNUMBER

Results by group30

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Corticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 6 Months After RandomizationAdalimumab (ADA)0.6995% Confidence Interval 0.60 to 0.77Cumulative proportion of participants
Corticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 6 Months After RandomizationConventional Immunosuppression (CON)0.5495% Confidence Interval 0.44 to 0.64Cumulative proportion of participants
Corticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 12 Months After RandomizationAdalimumab (ADA)0.8695% Confidence Interval 0.78 to 0.92Cumulative proportion of participants
Corticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 12 Months After RandomizationConventional Immunosuppression (CON)0.7795% Confidence Interval 0.67 to 0.84Cumulative proportion of participants
Corticosteroid Discontinuation Success by 6 MonthsAdalimumab (ADA)0.1595% Confidence Interval 0.09 to 0.24Cumulative proportion of participants
Corticosteroid Discontinuation Success by 6 MonthsConventional Immunosuppression (CON)0.1195% Confidence Interval 0.06 to 0.18Cumulative proportion of participants
Corticosteroid Discontinuation Success by 12 MonthsAdalimumab (ADA)0.5595% Confidence Interval 0.45 to 0.64Cumulative proportion of participants
Corticosteroid Discontinuation Success by 12 MonthsConventional Immunosuppression (CON)0.4095% Confidence Interval 0.30 to 0.50Cumulative proportion of participants
Corticosteroid Exposure Over 12 MonthsAdalimumab (ADA)11.895% Confidence Interval 10.5 to 13.2mg/day of steroid use over 12 months
Corticosteroid Exposure Over 12 MonthsConventional Immunosuppression (CON)13.895% Confidence Interval 12.3 to 15.4mg/day of steroid use over 12 months

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAdalimumab (ADA)114214
Overall StudySTARTEDConventional Immunosuppression (CIN)113220
Overall StudyPrimary Outcome 6 MonthsAdalimumab (ADA)112211
Overall StudyPrimary Outcome 6 MonthsConventional Immunosuppression (CIN)105204
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAdalimumab (ADA)109206
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDConventional Immunosuppression (CIN)98190
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAdalimumab (ADA)58
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDConventional Immunosuppression (CIN)1530

Adverse events108

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEpiretinal membraneEye disordersAdalimumab (ADA)17113
otherEpiretinal membraneEye disordersConventional Immunosuppression (CON)20110
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersAdalimumab (ADA)46113
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersConventional Immunosuppression (CON)48110
othermouth ulcerGastrointestinal disordersAdalimumab (ADA)21113
othermouth ulcerGastrointestinal disordersConventional Immunosuppression (CON)23110
otherDiahrrheaGastrointestinal disordersAdalimumab (ADA)42113
otherDiahrrheaGastrointestinal disordersConventional Immunosuppression (CON)46110
otherGingival swellingGastrointestinal disordersAdalimumab (ADA)23113
otherGingival swellingGastrointestinal disordersConventional Immunosuppression (CON)24110

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAdalimumab (ADA)0113
Total, all-cause mortalityConventional Immunosuppression (CON)0110
Total, other adverse eventsAdalimumab (ADA)108113
Total, other adverse eventsConventional Immunosuppression (CON)104110
Total, serious adverse eventsAdalimumab (ADA)16113
Total, serious adverse eventsConventional Immunosuppression (CON)13110

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
37172782DERIVEDPubMed
38925285DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Adalimumab (ADA) vs Conventional Immunosuppression (CON): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Adalimumab (ADA) vs Conventional Immunosuppression (CON): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03828019

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03828019/results?page=2