ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03828539

Head-to-head Study of Erenumab Against Topiramate in Patients With Episodic and Chronic Migraine

NCT03828539, Phase 4, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2021-08-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Head-to-head Study of Erenumab Against Topiramate in Patients With Episodic and Chronic Migraine. Trials, record NCT03828539. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03828539

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Head-to-head Study of Erenumab Against Topiramate in Patients With Episodic and Chronic Migraine
NCT number
NCT03828539
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
777 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Migraine
Interventions
Erenumab, Topiramate, Erenumab matching placebo, Topiramate matching placebo
First posted
2019-02-04
Last updated
2021-10-11
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2018-000943-15
Results first posted
2021-08-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of Patients With Treatment Discontinuation Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Double-blind Treatment Epoch/Period (DBTE)24 Weeks
The primary objective was to demonstrate the tolerability of 70 mg and 140 mg erenumab compared to topiramate in the highest tolerated dose assessed by the rate of patients discontinuing treatment due to AE during the double-blind epoch of the study.
SecondaryNumber of Patients With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) Over the Last Three Months (Month 4, 5, and 6)Baseline, Last three months (month 4, 5, and 6)
The secondary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of erenumab compared to topiramate on the proportion of patients with at least 50% reduction from baseline in MMDs. The Baseline period was defined as the period between Week -4 and the day prior to first dose. This was analyzed by logistic regression over the last 3 months (months 4, 5, and 6) of treatment. All the subjects' data collected regarding 50% response in MMD was used in the analysis regardless of whether subjects discontinue study treatment or not. Subjects with missing response information on this endpoint were imputed as non-response (non-responder imputation).
OtherEXPLORATORY ENDPOINT: Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 5 Points Reduction in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline, Week 24
The HIT-6 is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure that assesses the negative effects of headaches on normal activity. Six items assess the frequency of pain severity, headaches limiting daily activity (household, work, school, and social), wanting to lie down when headache is experienced, feeling too tired to work or do daily activities because of headache, feeling "fed up" or irritated because of headache, and headaches limiting ability to concentrate or work on daily activities. Each of the 6 questions is responded to using 1 of 5 response categories: "never," "rarely," "sometimes," "very often," or "always." For each HIT-6 item, 6, 8, 10, 11, or 13 points, respectively, are assigned to the response provided. These points are summed to produce a total HIT-6 score that ranges from 36 to 78. HIT-6 scores are categorized into 4 grades: little or no impact (49 or less), some impact (50 - 55), substantial impact (56 - 59), and severe impact (60 - 78) due to headache.
OtherEXPLORATORY ENDPOINT: Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 5 Points Increase in the Medical Outcome Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline, Week 24
The SF-36 is a widely used and extensively studied instrument to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among healthy subjects and patients with acute and chronic conditions. It consists of eight subscales that can be scored individually: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. Two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) also can be computed. The SF-36 has proven useful in monitoring general and specific populations, comparing the relative burden of different disease, differentiating the health benefits produced by different treatments, and in screening individual patients. The purpose of the SF-36 in this study was to assess the HRQoL of patients. Given the nature of this disease and the 4-weekly assessment, the SF-36 version 2, with a 4-week recall period, was used in this study.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion of Patients With Treatment Discontinuation Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Double-blind Treatment Epoch/Period (DBTE)24 WeeksFull Analysis Set (FAS)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) Over the Last Three Months (Month 4, 5, and 6)Baseline, Last three months (month 4, 5, and 6)Full Analysis Set (FAS)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDEXPLORATORY ENDPOINT: Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 5 Points Reduction in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline, Week 24Full Analysis Set (FAS)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDEXPLORATORY ENDPOINT: Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 5 Points Increase in the Medical Outcome Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline, Week 24Full Analysis Set (FAS)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group10

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Patients With Treatment Discontinuation Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Double-blind Treatment Epoch/Period (DBTE)Erenumab41Participants
Proportion of Patients With Treatment Discontinuation Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Double-blind Treatment Epoch/Period (DBTE)Topiramate151Participants
Number of Patients With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) Over the Last Three Months (Month 4, 5, and 6)Erenumab215Participants
Number of Patients With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) Over the Last Three Months (Month 4, 5, and 6)Topiramate121Participants
EXPLORATORY ENDPOINT: Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 5 Points Reduction in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) From Baseline to Week 24Erenumab280Participants
EXPLORATORY ENDPOINT: Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 5 Points Reduction in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) From Baseline to Week 24Topiramate209Participants
EXPLORATORY ENDPOINT: Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 5 Points Increase in the Medical Outcome Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36) From Baseline to Week 24ErenumabPhysical Component Summary (PCS)185Participants
EXPLORATORY ENDPOINT: Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 5 Points Increase in the Medical Outcome Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36) From Baseline to Week 24TopiramatePhysical Component Summary (PCS)145Participants
EXPLORATORY ENDPOINT: Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 5 Points Increase in the Medical Outcome Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36) From Baseline to Week 24ErenumabMental Component Summary (MCS)98Participants
EXPLORATORY ENDPOINT: Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 5 Points Increase in the Medical Outcome Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36) From Baseline to Week 24TopiramateMental Component Summary (MCS)65Participants

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDErenumab389
Overall StudySTARTEDTopiramate388
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Erenumab388
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Topiramate388
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set (SAF)Erenumab388
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set (SAF)Topiramate388
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDErenumab373
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTopiramate366
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDErenumab16
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTopiramate22

Adverse events112

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersErenumab20388
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersTopiramate24388
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersErenumab22388
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersTopiramate23388
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersErenumab48388
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersTopiramate12388
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersErenumab20388
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTopiramate29388
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersErenumab36388
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTopiramate71388

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityErenumab0388
Total, all-cause mortalityTopiramate0388
Total, other adverse eventsErenumab253388
Total, other adverse eventsTopiramate331388
Total, serious adverse eventsErenumab10388
Total, serious adverse eventsTopiramate19388

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
34743579DERIVEDPubMed
36380284DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Erenumab vs Topiramate: EXPLORATORY ENDPOINT: Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 5 Points Reduction in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) From Baseline to Week 24Trial comparisons
Erenumab vs Topiramate: Proportion of Patients With Treatment Discontinuation Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Double-blind Treatment Epoch/Period (DBTE)Trial comparisons
Erenumab vs Topiramate: Number of Patients With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) Over the Last Three Months (Month 4, 5, and 6)Trial comparisons
Erenumab vs Topiramate: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Erenumab vs Topiramate: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03828539

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03828539/events?page=2