ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03830177

Safety and Efficacy of a Topical Scalp Treatment for Dry Scalp Conditions in Children and Adult

NCT03830177, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago; results first posted 2025-02-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of a Topical Scalp Treatment for Dry Scalp Conditions in Children and Adult. Trials, record NCT03830177. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03830177

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of a Topical Scalp Treatment for Dry Scalp Conditions in Children and Adult
NCT number
NCT03830177
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
77 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Conditions
Dermatitis, Seborrheic, Dry Skin; Eczema
Interventions
Natural Treatment
First posted
2019-02-05
Last updated
2025-02-24
Results first posted
2025-02-24
Limitations and caveats
RODAC: Though scalp swabs were collected, no microbiome data were generated as analysis did not occur. Due to budgetary constraints, RODAC plate analysis was not conducted. The study is now closed, and the IRB is being finalized. Thus, no data are available for this outcome. There is no possibility of future analysis.~Child SCALPDEX: Statistical analysis could not be performed since endpoint data were not collected. Thus, changes in quality of life for this subgroup could not be analyzed.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryEfficacy Determined Using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) - AdultBaseline, 2 weeks (Study Endpoint)
The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) is a 5-point scale used to evaluate the severity of dry scalp conditions. Scores range from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe disease), based on clinical signs such as flaking, erythema, and pruritus. Assessments were conducted at baseline and endpoint to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment in reducing symptom severity.
PrimaryEfficacy Determined Using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) - ChildBaseline, 2 weeks (Study Endpoint)
The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) is a 5-point scale used to evaluate the severity of dry scalp conditions. Scores range from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe disease), based on clinical signs such as flaking, erythema, and pruritus. Assessments were conducted at baseline and endpoint to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment in reducing symptom severity.
PrimaryEfficacy Determined Using the Total Severity Scale (TSS) - AdultBaseline, 2 weeks (Study Endpoint)
The Total Severity Scale (TSS) evaluates the severity of dry scalp conditions by averaging individual scores for erythema, scaling, and pruritus of scalp lesions. Each component is scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The TSS is calculated by summing the scores of individual subscales, each representing a key symptom or feature of the condition, for a total possible score range of 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating greater severity. TSS assessments were conducted at baseline and 2 weeks (Study Endpoint) to determine the treatment's efficacy in reducing symptom severity.
PrimaryEfficacy Determined Using the Total Severity Scale (TSS) - ChildBaseline, 2 weeks (Study Endpoint)
The Total Severity Scale (TSS) evaluates the severity of dry scalp conditions by averaging individual scores for erythema, scaling, and pruritus of scalp lesions. Each component is scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The TSS is calculated by summing the scores of individual subscales, each representing a key symptom or feature of the condition, for a total possible score range of 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating greater severity. TSS assessments were conducted at baseline and 2 weeks (Study Endpoint) to determine the treatment's efficacy in reducing symptom severity.
SecondaryChange in Bacterial Composition of Scalp Using RODAC6 months
This exploratory outcome assesses whether the topical treatment alters the scalp microbiome to more closely resemble that of a healthy scalp. Scalp samples were collected at baseline and endpoint using swabs and analyzed with 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing for bacterial diversity and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing for fungal diversity. Colony counts were measured using the Replicate Organism Detection and Counting (RODAC) method to evaluate bacterial and fungal load changes.
SecondaryQuality of Life Change - AdultBaseline, 2 weeks (Study Endpoint)
Quality of life was assessed using the ScalpDex-23, a validated 23-item instrument designed to evaluate the impact of scalp dermatitis on symptoms, functioning, and emotions. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale ('Never' = 0, 'Rarely' = 25, 'Sometimes' = 50, 'Often' = 75, 'All the time' = 100), with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Subscale scores were calculated for Symptoms (7 items), Emotion (8 items), and Functioning (8 items) by averaging the respective item scores. The total ScalpDex-23 score was calculated as the average of the three subscale scores, yielding a final value ranging from 0 to 100. Assessments were conducted at Baseline and after 2 weeks (Study Endpoint) to measure changes over time.
SecondaryQuality of Life Change - Child1 week (Study midpoint)
Quality of life was assessed using the ScalpDex-23, a validated 23-item instrument designed to evaluate the impact of scalp dermatitis on symptoms, functioning, and emotions. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale ('Never' = 0, 'Rarely' = 25, 'Sometimes' = 50, 'Often' = 75, 'All the time' = 100), with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Subscale scores were calculated for Symptoms (7 items), Emotion (8 items), and Functioning (8 items) by averaging the respective item scores. The total ScalpDex-23 score was calculated as the average of the three subscale scores, yielding a final value ranging from 0 to 100. Originally, assessments were to be conducted at baseline and endpoint to measure changes in quality of life. However, for children, only midpoint data were collected, so change could not be measured.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYEfficacy Determined Using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) - AdultBaseline, 2 weeks (Study Endpoint)units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYEfficacy Determined Using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) - ChildBaseline, 2 weeks (Study Endpoint)units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYEfficacy Determined Using the Total Severity Scale (TSS) - AdultBaseline, 2 weeks (Study Endpoint)units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYEfficacy Determined Using the Total Severity Scale (TSS) - ChildBaseline, 2 weeks (Study Endpoint)units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Bacterial Composition of Scalp Using RODAC6 months
Although microbiome samples were collected, no laboratory analysis was conducted, and no data were generated for this outcome measure. As a result, there are no available results to report. There is absolutely no possibility of future analysis.
SECONDARYQuality of Life Change - AdultBaseline, 2 weeks (Study Endpoint)units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYQuality of Life Change - Child1 week (Study midpoint)units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group11

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Efficacy Determined Using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) - AdultIntervention ArmBaseline2.1Standard Deviation 0.6units on a scale
Efficacy Determined Using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) - AdultIntervention ArmEndpoint1.1Standard Deviation 0.8units on a scale
Efficacy Determined Using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) - ChildIntervention ArmBaseline3.095% Confidence Interval 2.8 to 3.3units on a scale
Efficacy Determined Using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) - ChildIntervention ArmEndpoint2.095% Confidence Interval 1.8 to 2.2units on a scale
Efficacy Determined Using the Total Severity Scale (TSS) - AdultIntervention ArmBaseline3.5Standard Deviation 1.4units on a scale
Efficacy Determined Using the Total Severity Scale (TSS) - AdultIntervention ArmEndpoint1.8Standard Deviation 1.0units on a scale
Efficacy Determined Using the Total Severity Scale (TSS) - ChildIntervention ArmBaseline3.695% Confidence Interval 3.1 to 4.2units on a scale
Efficacy Determined Using the Total Severity Scale (TSS) - ChildIntervention ArmEndpoint1.895% Confidence Interval 1.3 to 2.2units on a scale
Quality of Life Change - AdultIntervention ArmBaseline46Standard Deviation 13.4units on a scale
Quality of Life Change - AdultIntervention ArmEndpoint39.5Standard Deviation 10.3units on a scale

Participant flow5

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDIntervention Arm77
Overall StudyAdultIntervention Arm35
Overall StudyChildIntervention Arm42
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIntervention Arm77
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIntervention Arm0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAdults035
Total, all-cause mortalityChildren042
Total, other adverse eventsAdults035
Total, other adverse eventsChildren042
Total, serious adverse eventsAdults035
Total, serious adverse eventsChildren042

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Adults vs Children: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Adults vs Children: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03830177

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03830177/registered