ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03836859

Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability & PK of rhNGF in Healthy Volunteers

NCT03836859, Phase 1, Completed, Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A; results first posted 2020-06-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability & PK of rhNGF in Healthy Volunteers. Trials, record NCT03836859. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03836859

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability & PK of rhNGF in Healthy Volunteers
NCT number
NCT03836859
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Enrollment
30 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
Conditions
Healthy Volunteers
Interventions
rhNGF 20μg/mL, Placebo
First posted
2019-02-11
Last updated
2023-12-26
Results first posted
2020-06-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs).On Day 1 (single dose scheme), Days 2-6 (multiple dose scheme), Day 7 (Follow-up [FU] 1), Day 8 (FU 2); Day 16 (FU 3), and Day 35-42 (FU 4)
TEAEs were defined as an adverse event (AE), which started after the first dose of study treatment. These comprise AEs during the treatment and follow-up period. For TEAE the number of events was provided.
PrimaryNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During First Dose Schedule (TEAEs Dose 1).During first dose schedule (TEAE Dose 1, which started after first dose of study treatment at Day 1 till before administration of the first dose at Treatment Day 2)TEAEs Dose 1 were defined as TEAEs, which started after the first dose of study treatment and before administration of the first dose at Treatment Day 2. For TEAE the number of events was provided.
PrimaryNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During Second Dose Schedule (TEAEs Dose 2).During second dose schedule (TEAE Dose 2, which started on/after the first dose at Treatment Day 2 till before Follow-Up Day 7 (FU1) visitTEAEs Dose 2 were defined as TEAEs, which started on/after the first dose at Treatment Day 2 and before Follow-Up Day 7 visit.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Ocular Tolerability Score in Study Eye: Single Doseat Treatment Day 2 pre-dose
Change from baseline in VAS ocular tolerability score in study eye at Treatment Day 2 predose (Tolerability of 1x0.70 μg rhNGF per day) for overall is presented. In this context, "Baseline" was defined as the pre-treatment assessment at the Baseline (D-1) visit. A ocular tolerability score was determined using a 100 mm VAS on which 0 meant No symptoms and 100 meant the Worst possible discomfort. The patients subjectively evaluated their ocular symptoms (foreign body sensation, burning or stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision and photophobia) using the VAS giving the value they were feeling from none to an extreme value. The ocular symptoms were evaluated by the patients through the scale.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Ocular Tolerability Score in Study Eye: Multiple Doseat Day 2 8h, Day 3 predose, Day 6 pre-dose, Day 6 8h, Day 7 (FU1), Day 8 (FU2), Day 16 (FU3)
Change from baseline in VAS ocular tolerability score in study eye at Day 2 8h, Day 3 predose, Day 6 pre-dose, Day 6 8h, Day 7 (FU1), Day 8 (FU2), Day 16 (FU3) (Tolerability of 6x0.70 μg rhNGF per day) for overall is presented. In this context, "Baseline" was defined as the pre-treatment assessment at the Baseline (D-1) visit.A ocular tolerability score was determined using a 100 mm VAS on which 0 meant No symptoms and 100 meant the Worst possible discomfort. The patients subjectively evaluated their ocular symptoms (foreign body sensation, burning or stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision and photophobia) using the VAS giving the value they were feeling from none to an extreme value. The ocular symptoms were evaluated by the patients through the scale.
SecondaryNumber of Follow-Up AEs (FUAE)on or after Follow-Up Day 7 (FU1)Follow-Up AEs (FUAE) were defined as TEAEs which start on or after Follow-Up Day 7 (FU1) visit
SecondaryNumber of Ocular TEAEs by EyesOn Day 1 (single dose scheme), Days 2-6 (multiple dose scheme), Day 7 (Follow-up [FU] 1), Day 8 (FU 2); Day 16 (FU 3), and Day 35-42 (FU 4)
Ocular TEAEs were defined as an adverse event (AE) interesting the study or the non-study eye, which started after the first dose of study treatment. These comprise ocular AEs during the treatment and follow-up period. For these AE, the number of events was provided for the study eye and the non-study eye, separately.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Eye Over All Visitson Day -1 and at Day 8 (Follow up [FU] 2) and Day 16 (FU3)
IOP was performed using either Goldmann applanation tonometry after the instillation of a topical anaesthetic. IOP was measured in both eyes after completion of all other slit lamp examinations to avoid potential interference with the other evaluations.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity Score for the Study Eye Over All VisitsOn Day 1 (single dose scheme), Days 2,3,6 (multiple dose scheme), Day 7 (Follow-up [FU] 1), Day 8 (FU 2); Day 16 (FU 3)
Values of Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) scores were measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score. The ETDRS charts use letters, or a geometric progression in letter size from line to line, under standardized lighting conditions. The patient starts at the top of the chart, or on the last row where he or she can read all of the letters, and reads down the chart until he or she reaches a row where a minimum of three letters on a line cannot be read. The patient is scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. Therefore, the higher the number of letters the higher the visual acuity. Changes in the ETDRS score from baseline are summarised for the study eye.
SecondaryChange in Baseline in LogMAR [Derived as - Log (Snellen Equivalent Result)] for the Study Eye Over All Visits.On Day 1 (single dose scheme), Days 2,3,6 (multiple dose scheme), Day 7 (Follow-up [FU] 1), Day 8 (FU 2); Day 16 (FU 3)
LogMAR is the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution. The LogMAR was derived as - log (Snellen Equivalent result). LogMAR values range from 1.6 (20/800 Snellen Equivalent) to -0.2 (20/12 Snellen Equivalent). The lower the LogMAR value, the better the visual acuity.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs).On Day 1 (single dose scheme), Days 2-6 (multiple dose scheme), Day 7 (Follow-up [FU] 1), Day 8 (FU 2); Day 16 (FU 3), and Day 35-42 (FU 4)The safety population is represented by randomized subjects who received a dose of study medication in at least one eye. All 30 randomized subjects were included in the Safety population.eventsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During First Dose Schedule (TEAEs Dose 1).During first dose schedule (TEAE Dose 1, which started after first dose of study treatment at Day 1 till before administration of the first dose at Treatment Day 2)The safety population is represented by randomized subjects who received a dose of study medication in at least one eye. All 30 randomized subjects were included in the Safety population.eventsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During Second Dose Schedule (TEAEs Dose 2).During second dose schedule (TEAE Dose 2, which started on/after the first dose at Treatment Day 2 till before Follow-Up Day 7 (FU1) visitThe safety population is represented by randomized subjects who received a dose of study medication in at least one eye. All 30 randomized subjects were included in the Safety population.eventsNUMBER
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Ocular Tolerability Score in Study Eye: Single Doseat Treatment Day 2 pre-dosescore on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Ocular Tolerability Score in Study Eye: Multiple Doseat Day 2 8h, Day 3 predose, Day 6 pre-dose, Day 6 8h, Day 7 (FU1), Day 8 (FU2), Day 16 (FU3)The safety population is represented by randomized subjects who received a dose of study medication in at least one eye. All 30 randomized subjects were included in the Safety population.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Follow-Up AEs (FUAE)on or after Follow-Up Day 7 (FU1)The safety population is represented by randomized subjects who received a dose of study medication in at least one eye. All 30 randomized subjects were included in the Safety population.eventsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Ocular TEAEs by EyesOn Day 1 (single dose scheme), Days 2-6 (multiple dose scheme), Day 7 (Follow-up [FU] 1), Day 8 (FU 2); Day 16 (FU 3), and Day 35-42 (FU 4)The safety population is represented by randomized subjects who received a dose of study medication in at least one eye. All 30 randomized subjects were included in the Safety population.eventsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Eye Over All Visitson Day -1 and at Day 8 (Follow up [FU] 2) and Day 16 (FU3)The safety population is represented by randomized subjects who received a dose of study medication in at least one eye. All 30 randomized subjects were included in the Safety populationmmHgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity Score for the Study Eye Over All VisitsOn Day 1 (single dose scheme), Days 2,3,6 (multiple dose scheme), Day 7 (Follow-up [FU] 1), Day 8 (FU 2); Day 16 (FU 3)The safety population is represented by randomized subjects who received a dose of study medication in at least one eye. All 30 randomized subjects were included in the Safety population.LettersMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Baseline in LogMAR [Derived as - Log (Snellen Equivalent Result)] for the Study Eye Over All Visits.On Day 1 (single dose scheme), Days 2,3,6 (multiple dose scheme), Day 7 (Follow-up [FU] 1), Day 8 (FU 2); Day 16 (FU 3)The safety population is represented by randomized subjects who received a dose of study medication in at least one eye. All 30 randomized subjects were included in the Safety population.LogMARMEAN

Results by group240

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs).rhNGF 20μg/mL27events
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs).Placebo9events
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During First Dose Schedule (TEAEs Dose 1).rhNGF 20μg/mL3events
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During First Dose Schedule (TEAEs Dose 1).Placebo2events
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During Second Dose Schedule (TEAEs Dose 2).rhNGF 20μg/mL16events
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During Second Dose Schedule (TEAEs Dose 2).Placebo4events
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Ocular Tolerability Score in Study Eye: Single DoserhNGF 20μg/mL0.36Standard Deviation 1.325score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Ocular Tolerability Score in Study Eye: Single DosePlacebo0.24Standard Deviation 0.410score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Ocular Tolerability Score in Study Eye: Multiple DoserhNGF 20μg/mLDay 2 - 8h0.14Standard Deviation 0.882score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Ocular Tolerability Score in Study Eye: Multiple DosePlaceboDay 2 - 8h-0.09Standard Deviation 0.376score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDrhNGF 20μg/mL20
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo10
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDrhNGF 20μg/mL20
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo10
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDrhNGF 20μg/mL0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo0

Adverse events24

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsrhNGF 20μg/mL2202
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsPlacebo1101
otherAspartate aminotransferase incresedInvestigationsrhNGF 20μg/mL2202
otherAspartate aminotransferase incresedInvestigationsPlacebo1101
otherVital dye staining corneal presentInvestigationsrhNGF 20μg/mL5209
otherVital dye staining corneal presentInvestigationsPlacebo3104
otherConjunctivitisInfections and infestationsrhNGF 20μg/mL6206
otherConjunctivitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo0100
otherEye painEye disordersrhNGF 20μg/mL2202
otherEye painEye disordersPlacebo0100

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityrhNGF 20μg/mL020
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo010
Total, other adverse eventsrhNGF 20μg/mL1020
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo510
Total, serious adverse eventsrhNGF 20μg/mL020
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo010

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
rhNGF 20μg/mL vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
rhNGF 20μg/mL vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03836859

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03836859/results?page=2