ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03858634

A Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of KPL-716 in Reducing Pruritus in Chronic Pruritic Diseases

NCT03858634, Phase 2, Completed, Genentech, Inc.; results first posted 2021-12-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of KPL-716 in Reducing Pruritus in Chronic Pruritic Diseases. Trials, record NCT03858634. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03858634

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of KPL-716 in Reducing Pruritus in Chronic Pruritic Diseases
NCT number
NCT03858634
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
58 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Genentech, Inc.
Conditions
Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria, Chronic Idiopathic Pruritus, Lichen Planus, Lichen Simplex Chronicus, Plaque Psoriasis
Interventions
KPL-716, Placebo
First posted
2019-03-01
Last updated
2025-03-18
Results first posted
2021-12-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes21

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
WI-NRS score: Participants were asked daily to assign a numerical score to the intensity of their most severe (worst) pruritus in the past 24 hours using a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pruritus and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pruritus. Daily scores were averaged for a weekly score. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
WI-NRS score: Participants were asked daily to assign a numerical score to the intensity of their most severe (worst) pruritus in the past 24 hours using a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pruritus and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pruritus. Daily scores were averaged for a weekly score. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 1-18
WI-NRS score: Participants were asked daily to assign a numerical score to the intensity of their most severe (worst) pruritus in the past 24 hours using a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pruritus and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pruritus. Daily scores were averaged for a weekly score. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 1-18
WI-NRS score: Participants were asked daily to assign a numerical score to the intensity of their most severe (worst) pruritus in the past 24 hours using a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pruritus and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pruritus. Daily scores were averaged for a weekly score. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 1-8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18
Participants were asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents the intensity of their average pruritus experienced over the previous 3 days using a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pruritus and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pruritus.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus VAS Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 1-8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18
Participants were asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents the intensity of their average pruritus experienced over the previous 3 days using a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pruritus and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pruritus.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 5-D Pruritus Total Score Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18
This tool evaluates pruritus in 5 domains: duration, degree, direction, disability and distribution. Duration, degree and direction each consist of 1 item. The disability domain contains 4 items and the distribution domain includes 16 items. The first 4 domains are measured on a 5-point Likert scale. The scores from each domain are added together to obtain a total 5-D score ranging from 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus).
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in 5-D Pruritus Total Score Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18
This tool evaluates pruritus in 5 domains: duration, degree, direction, disability and distribution. Duration, degree and direction each consist of 1 item. The disability domain contains 4 items and the distribution domain includes 16 items. The first 4 domains are measured on a 5-point Likert scale. The scores from each domain are added together to obtain a total 5-D score ranging from 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥4-Point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 1-18
WI-NRS score: Participants were asked daily to assign a numerical score to the intensity of their most severe (worst) pruritus in the past 24 hours using a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pruritus and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pruritus. Daily scores were averaged for a weekly score. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Weekly Average Itch Severity Score: CIU Cohort OnlyBaseline, Weeks 1-18
Participants were asked daily to self-assess the intensity of their pruritus on a Weekly Average Itch Severity Score, which is a Component of Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7). The score for pruritis was graded from 0 (none) to 3 (intense), which was averaged over 7 consecutive days. The greater the severity of the disease the higher the score. Per protocol, the UAS7 tool was completed only by participants in the CIU Cohort.

Outcomes21

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
Modified intent to treat (mITT) set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of KPL-716 or placebo and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the double-blind treatment period. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 1-18
Modified intent to treat (mITT) set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of KPL-716 or placebo and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the double-blind treatment period. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Once a participant started treatment period (through Week 8), missing data in treatment period were imputed. Once a participant started the follow up (FU) period, missing data in FU period were imputed.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 1-18
Modified intent to treat (mITT) set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of KPL-716 or placebo and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the double-blind treatment period. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Once a participant started treatment period (through Week 8), missing data in treatment period were imputed. Once a participant started the follow up (FU) period, missing data in FU period were imputed.
percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 1-8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18
Modified intent to treat (mITT) set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of KPL-716 or placebo and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the double-blind treatment period. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Once a participant started treatment period (through Week 8), missing data in treatment period were imputed. Once a participant started the follow up (FU) period, missing data in FU period were imputed.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus VAS Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 1-8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18
Modified intent to treat (mITT) set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of KPL-716 or placebo and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the double-blind treatment period. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Once a participant started treatment period (through Week 8), missing data in treatment period were imputed. Once a participant started the follow up (FU) period, missing data in FU period were imputed.
percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 5-D Pruritus Total Score Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18
Modified intent to treat (mITT) set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of KPL-716 or placebo and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the double-blind treatment period. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Once a participant started treatment period (through Week 8), missing data in treatment period were imputed. Once a participant started the follow up (FU) period, missing data in FU period were imputed.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in 5-D Pruritus Total Score Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18
Modified intent to treat (mITT) set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of KPL-716 or placebo and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the double-blind treatment period. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Once a participant started treatment period (through Week 8), missing data in treatment period were imputed. Once a participant started the follow up (FU) period, missing data in FU period were imputed.
percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥4-Point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 1-18
Modified intent to treat (mITT) set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of KPL-716 or placebo and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the double-blind treatment period. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Once a participant started treatment period (through Week 8), missing data in treatment period were imputed. Once a participant started the follow up (FU) period, missing data in FU period were imputed.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Weekly Average Itch Severity Score: CIU Cohort OnlyBaseline, Weeks 1-18
Modified intent to treat (mITT) set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of KPL-716 or placebo and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the double-blind treatment period. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Once a participant started treatment period (through Week 8), missing data in treatment period were imputed. Once a participant started the follow up (FU) period, missing data in FU period were imputed.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Itch Severity Score: CIU Cohort OnlyBaseline, Weeks 1-18
Modified intent to treat (mITT) set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of KPL-716 or placebo and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the double-blind treatment period. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Once a participant started treatment period (through Week 8), missing data in treatment period were imputed. Once a participant started the follow up (FU) period, missing data in FU period were imputed.
percent changeMEAN

Results by group2,034

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8KPL-716: CIU Cohort-4.3Standard Error 1.84score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8Placebo: CIU Cohort-1.1Standard Error 2.66score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8KPL-716: CIP Cohort-4.3Standard Error 0.77score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8Placebo: CIP Cohort-3.7Standard Error 0.96score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8KPL-716: LP Cohort-3.1Standard Error 0.82score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8KPL-716: LSC Cohort-6.9Standard Error 0.81score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8Placebo: LSC Cohort0.7Standard Error 1.84score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8KPL-716: PPs Cohort-5.6Standard Error 0.69score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS at Week 8Placebo: PPs Cohort-2.5Standard Error 0.98score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average WI-NRS Over TimeKPL-716: CIU CohortChange at Week 1-1.9Standard Error 0.59score on a scale

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDKPL-71639
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo19
Overall StudyParticipants With Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria (CIU)KPL-7164
Overall StudyParticipants With Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria (CIU)Placebo2
Overall StudyParticipants With Chronic Idiopathic Pruritus (CIP)KPL-71614
Overall StudyParticipants With Chronic Idiopathic Pruritus (CIP)Placebo9
Overall StudyParticipants With Lichen Planus (LP)KPL-7163
Overall StudyParticipants With Lichen Planus (LP)Placebo0
Overall StudyParticipants With Lichen Simplex Chronicus (LSC)KPL-7164
Overall StudyParticipants With Lichen Simplex Chronicus (LSC)Placebo1

Adverse events90

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsKPL-716239
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo119
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsKPL-716139
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPlacebo119
otherSinusitisInfections and infestationsKPL-716139
otherSinusitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo119
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsKPL-716139
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo119
otherConjunctivitisInfections and infestationsKPL-716139
otherConjunctivitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo019

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityKPL-716039
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo019
Total, other adverse eventsKPL-7161539
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1119
Total, serious adverse eventsKPL-716139
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo019

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
KPL-716 vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
KPL-716 vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03858634

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03858634/registered?page=2