ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03860818

Improving Transplant Medication Safety Through A Technology and Pharmacist Intervention

NCT03860818, Not applicable, Completed, VA Office of Research and Development; results first posted 2024-08-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Improving Transplant Medication Safety Through A Technology and Pharmacist Intervention. Trials, record NCT03860818. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03860818

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Improving Transplant Medication Safety Through A Technology and Pharmacist Intervention
NCT number
NCT03860818
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
2,196 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Conditions
Transplant
Interventions
Health services delivery
First posted
2019-03-04
Last updated
2024-08-01
Results first posted
2024-08-01
Limitations and caveats
This was a pragmatic study, utilization of the system was not required and not uniform across sites or pharmacists. Not all alerts produced were addressed or deemed clinically relevant by intervention site pharmacists. Only ED visits and hospitalizations that occurred within the VA system were captured and used for outcome assessment for this study, which is a limitation. SRTR data for acute rejections are not comprehensive as patients were, on average, 9-years post-transplant.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAny Hospitalization or Any Emergency Room Visits24-months24-month count hospitalization and emergency room visits compared between the intervention and usual care groups
SecondaryTotal Estimated Health Care Costs, Compared Between the Intervention and Control Groups27-months
27-month total estimated health care costs, compared between the intervention and control groups (non-zero cost). Inpatient cost, outpatient cost, pharmacy cost, total cost Time Period (start to censor date) March 01, 2019 to June 30, 2021.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Graft Survival27-months
Estimated graft survival rates, compared between the intervention and usual care groups and defined as the proportion of patients that continue to have a functioning allograft at the end of the 27-month study
SecondaryPatient Survival- Percentage of Patients That Died During Study27-months
Estimated patient survival rates, compared between the intervention and usual care groups and defined as the proportion of patients alive at the end of the 27-month study. Number of patients who died during the study (March 2019 - June 2021), Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) or VA reported.
SecondaryMedication Safety Issues23-months
23-months, (August 2019-June 2021) Potential medication safety issues, defined as the proportion of patients with the following, based on automated reports for the transplant medication dashboard: 1. Percent of patients with missing labs 2. Percent of patients alarming lab values without follow up scheduled 3. Immunosuppression adherence, estimated using the proportion of days covered (PDC) 4. Percent of patients on significant drug interaction without a immunosuppressant level 5. Percent of patients with hospital discharge or ED visit without follow up scheduled
SecondaryClinically Relevant Alerts22-monthsProportion of alerts that were deemed clinical relevant and actionable by the intervention pharmacists 22 months (August 2019-June 2021)
SecondaryDashboard-Accepted Interventions23-months
Proportion of interventions that were deemed to be accepted when made to other providers based on dashboard reporting information Percentage of patients that had an alert accepted and addressed by a clinician 23 months, August 2019 - June 2021
SecondaryAverage Time Responding to Dashboard Alerts23-monthsAverage time each intervention pharmacist spent on assessing the dashboard alerts per week over the course of 23 months.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAny Hospitalization or Any Emergency Room Visits24-monthsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTotal Estimated Health Care Costs, Compared Between the Intervention and Control Groups27-months
The number analyzed in some of the rows of the outcome measure data table differ from the overall number of participants analyzed because not every patient had every type of cost - some didn't have any emergency department (ED) visits, some didn't have any hospitalizations, and a few didn't have any outpatient visits - no visit, no cost.
dollarsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Graft Survival27-monthsAll participants who were assigned to the armParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPatient Survival- Percentage of Patients That Died During Study27-monthsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMedication Safety Issues23-months
The dashboard intervention was not utilized in the control group and therefore could not be analyzed for this measure. The number of participants reported in here is inconsistent with total number of participants reported in this arm because there are two levels of analysis, the patient level and at the transplant level. Some patients had multiple transplants. Also, not every patient triggered an alert in the dashboard, so the alert numbers may differ from the number of clinical participants.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYClinically Relevant Alerts22-months
The dashboard intervention was not utilized in the control group and therefore could not be analyzed for this measure. The number of participants reported in here is inconsistent with total number of participants reported in this arm because there are two levels of analysis, the patient level and at the transplant level. Some patients had multiple transplants. Also, not every patient triggered an alert in the dashboard, so the alert numbers may differ from the number of clinical participants.
Dashboard alertsCOUNT_OF_UNITS
SECONDARYDashboard-Accepted Interventions23-months
The dashboard intervention was not utilized in the control group and therefore could not be analyzed for this measure. The number of participants reported in here is inconsistent with total number of participants reported in this arm because there are two levels of analysis, the patient level and at the transplant level. Some patients had multiple transplants. Also, not every patient triggered an alert in the dashboard, so the alert numbers may differ from the number of clinical participants.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYAverage Time Responding to Dashboard Alerts23-monthsThe dashboard intervention was not utilized in the control group and therefore could not be analyzed for this measure.MinutesMEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Any Hospitalization or Any Emergency Room VisitsControl ArmAny ED Visit During Study497Participants
Any Hospitalization or Any Emergency Room VisitsIntervention ArmAny ED Visit During Study574Participants
Any Hospitalization or Any Emergency Room VisitsControl ArmAny Inpatient stay During Study380Participants
Any Hospitalization or Any Emergency Room VisitsIntervention ArmAny Inpatient stay During Study391Participants
Total Estimated Health Care Costs, Compared Between the Intervention and Control GroupsControl ArmInpatient costs37,505Inter-Quartile Range 16,797 to 81,891dollars
Total Estimated Health Care Costs, Compared Between the Intervention and Control GroupsIntervention ArmInpatient costs56,600Inter-Quartile Range 22,417 to 108,634dollars
Total Estimated Health Care Costs, Compared Between the Intervention and Control GroupsControl ArmOutpatient costs17,077Inter-Quartile Range 6,473 to 38,164dollars
Total Estimated Health Care Costs, Compared Between the Intervention and Control GroupsIntervention ArmOutpatient costs25,560Inter-Quartile Range 10,388 to 51,971dollars
Total Estimated Health Care Costs, Compared Between the Intervention and Control GroupsControl ArmPharmacy costs10,306Inter-Quartile Range 4,534 to 19,869dollars
Total Estimated Health Care Costs, Compared Between the Intervention and Control GroupsIntervention ArmPharmacy costs10,555Inter-Quartile Range 5,374 to 20,485dollars

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDControl Arm896
Overall StudySTARTEDIntervention Arm1,300
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDControl Arm720
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIntervention Arm1,060
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDControl Arm176
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIntervention Arm240

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousGraft FailureGeneral disordersControl Arm32896
seriousGraft FailureGeneral disordersIntervention Arm451,300
seriousInpatient hospitalizationGeneral disordersControl Arm380896
seriousInpatient hospitalizationGeneral disordersIntervention Arm3911,300

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityControl Arm144896
Total, all-cause mortalityIntervention Arm1951,300
Total, other adverse eventsControl Arm00
Total, other adverse eventsIntervention Arm00
Total, serious adverse eventsControl Arm412896
Total, serious adverse eventsIntervention Arm4361,300

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
30724092RESULTPubMed
31573933DERIVEDPubMed
37562577RESULTPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Intervention Arm vs Control Arm: Patient Survival- Percentage of Patients That Died During StudyTrial comparisons
Intervention Arm vs Control Arm: Number of Participants With Graft SurvivalTrial comparisons
Intervention Arm vs Control Arm: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Intervention Arm vs Control Arm: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03860818

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03860818/results?page=2