ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03884101

Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) Versus Chemotherapy for Endometrial Carcinoma (ENGOT-en9 / MK-7902-001)

NCT03884101, Phase 3, Completed, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; results first posted 2024-10-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) Versus Chemotherapy for Endometrial Carcinoma (ENGOT-en9 / MK-7902-001). Trials, record NCT03884101. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03884101

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) Versus Chemotherapy for Endometrial Carcinoma (ENGOT-en9 / MK-7902-001)
NCT number
NCT03884101
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
842 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Conditions
Endometrial Neoplasms
Interventions
Lenvatinib, Pembrolizumab, Paclitaxel, Carboplatin
First posted
2019-03-21
Last updated
2026-02-02
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2018-003009-24
Results first posted
2024-10-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Mismatch Repair Proficient (pMMR) Participants
Up to approximately 44 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum had to demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. The PFS of pMMR participants was presented.
PrimaryPFS Based on RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in All Randomized ParticipantsUp to approximately 44 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented PD per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum had to demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. The PFS of all randomized participants was presented.
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS) in pMMR ParticipantsUp to approximately 51 months
OS was measured from the time of randomization up to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were to be censored at the date of the last follow-up. The OS for pMMR participants is presented.
PrimaryOS in All Randomized ParticipantsUp to approximately 51 months
OS was measured from the time of randomization up to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were to be censored at the date of the last follow-up. The OS for all randomized participants is presented.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) Based on RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in pMMR ParticipantsUp to approximately 51 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using RECIST 1.1. The percentage of pMMR participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented.
SecondaryORR Based on RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in All Randomized ParticipantsUp to approximately 51 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a CR: Disappearance of all target lesions or a PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions as assessed using RECIST 1.1. The percentage of all randomized participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented.
Secondary
Mean Change From Baseline in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) in pMMR Participants
Baseline and up to approximately 18 weeks
The EORTC QLQ-C30 was developed to assess the quality of life of patients with cancer. It contains 30 questions (items), 24 of which aggregate into nine multi-item scales representing various aspects, or dimensions, of quality of life (QoL): one global scale, five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea, pain), and six additional single-symptom items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (dyspnoea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation and diarrhoea) and perceived financial impact of the disease. Individual items are scored on a 4-point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Raw scores for each scale are standardized into a range of 0 to 100 by linear transformation; a higher score on the global and functional scales represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, and a higher score on the symptom scale represents a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in All Randomized ParticipantsBaseline and up to approximately 18 weeks
The EORTC QLQ-C30 was developed to assess the quality of life of patients with cancer. It contains 30 questions (items), 24 of which aggregate into nine multi-item scales representing various aspects, or dimensions, of QoL: one global scale, five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea, pain), and six additional single-symptom items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (dyspnoea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation and diarrhoea) and perceived financial impact of the disease. Individual items are scored on a 4-point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Raw scores for each scale are standardized into a range of 0 to 100 by linear transformation; a higher score on the global and functional scales represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, and a higher score on the symptom scale represents a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 68 months
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated). Per protocol, the number of participants who experienced one or more AEs was reported for the first course lenvatinib + pembrolizumab and paclitaxel + carboplatin arms.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced a Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Up to approximately 68 months
An SAE was an AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability, was a congenital birth defect, or was another important medical event. Per protocol, the number of participants who experienced one or more SAEs was reported for the first course lenvatinib + pembrolizumab and paclitaxel + carboplatin arms.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Mismatch Repair Proficient (pMMR) Participants
Up to approximately 44 monthsAll randomized pMMR participants were analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were randomized.MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYPFS Based on RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in All Randomized ParticipantsUp to approximately 44 monthsAll randomized participants were analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were randomized.MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS) in pMMR ParticipantsUp to approximately 51 monthsAll randomized pMMR participants were analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were randomized.MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYOS in All Randomized ParticipantsUp to approximately 51 monthsAll randomized participants were analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were randomized.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYObjective Response Rate (ORR) Based on RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in pMMR ParticipantsUp to approximately 51 monthsPer protocol, all randomized pMMR participants with measurable disease at the baseline scan were analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were randomized.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYORR Based on RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in All Randomized ParticipantsUp to approximately 51 monthsPer protocol, all randomized participants with measurable disease at the baseline scan were analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were randomized.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) in pMMR Participants
Baseline and up to approximately 18 weeksAll randomized pMMR participants who had at least one assessment available for EORTC QLQ-C30 and received at least one dose of the study intervention were analyzed.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in All Randomized ParticipantsBaseline and up to approximately 18 weeksAll randomized participants who had at least one assessment available for EORTC QLQ-C30 and received at least one dose of the study intervention were analyzed.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 68 monthsAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention were analyzed.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Experienced a Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Up to approximately 68 monthsAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention were analyzed.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Mismatch Repair Proficient (pMMR) Participants
Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab9.695% Confidence Interval 8.2 to 11.9Months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Mismatch Repair Proficient (pMMR) Participants
Paclitaxel + Carboplatin10.295% Confidence Interval 8.4 to 10.4Months
PFS Based on RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in All Randomized ParticipantsLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab12.595% Confidence Interval 10.3 to 15.1Months
PFS Based on RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in All Randomized ParticipantsPaclitaxel + Carboplatin10.295% Confidence Interval 8.4 to 10.4Months
Overall Survival (OS) in pMMR ParticipantsLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab30.995% Confidence Interval 25.4 to 37.7Months
Overall Survival (OS) in pMMR ParticipantsPaclitaxel + Carboplatin29.495% Confidence Interval 26.2 to 35.4Months
OS in All Randomized ParticipantsLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab37.795% Confidence Interval 32.2 to 43.6Months
OS in All Randomized ParticipantsPaclitaxel + Carboplatin32.195% Confidence Interval 27.2 to 35.7Months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in pMMR ParticipantsLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab50.995% Confidence Interval 45.3 to 56.6Percentage of Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in pMMR ParticipantsPaclitaxel + Carboplatin55.295% Confidence Interval 49.5 to 60.8Percentage of Participants

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab420
Overall StudySTARTEDPaclitaxel + Carboplatin422
Overall StudyTreatedLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab420
Overall StudyTreatedPaclitaxel + Carboplatin411
Overall StudyReceived a Second Course of PembrolizumabLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab17
Overall StudyReceived a Second Course of PembrolizumabPaclitaxel + Carboplatin0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPaclitaxel + Carboplatin0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab420
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPaclitaxel + Carboplatin422

Adverse events1,176

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFirst Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab95420130
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPaclitaxel + Carboplatin209411300
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSecond Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab4174
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersFirst Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab64208
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersPaclitaxel + Carboplatin04110
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersSecond Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab1171
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFirst Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab1442045
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPaclitaxel + Carboplatin53411149
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSecond Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab1173
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFirst Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab842014

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFirst Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab233420
Total, all-cause mortalityPaclitaxel + Carboplatin253422
Total, all-cause mortalitySecond Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab317
Total, other adverse eventsFirst Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab416420
Total, other adverse eventsPaclitaxel + Carboplatin397411
Total, other adverse eventsSecond Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab1517
Total, serious adverse eventsFirst Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab230420
Total, serious adverse eventsPaclitaxel + Carboplatin84411
Total, serious adverse eventsSecond Course: Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab317

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
34799418DERIVEDPubMed
39591551RESULTPubMed
41494216DERIVEDPubMed
42167105DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab vs Paclitaxel + Carboplatin: Number of Participants Who Experienced a Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Trial comparisons
Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab vs Paclitaxel + Carboplatin: Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AETrial comparisons
Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab vs Paclitaxel + Carboplatin: Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Trial comparisons
Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab vs Paclitaxel + Carboplatin: Number of Participants Who Experienced an Immune-Related Adverse Event (irAE)Trial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03884101

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03884101/results?page=2