ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03898180

Study of First-line Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) With Lenvatinib (MK-7902/E7080) in Urothelial Carcinoma Cisplatin-ineligible Participants Whose Tumors Express Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 and in Participants Ineligible for Platinum-containing Chemotherapy (MK-7902-011/E7080-G000-317/ LEAP-011)

NCT03898180, Phase 3, Completed, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; results first posted 2023-10-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of First-line Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) With Lenvatinib (MK-7902/E7080) in Urothelial Carcinoma Cisplatin-ineligible Participants Whose Tumors Express Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 and in Participants Ineligible for Platinum-containing Chemotherapy (MK-7902-011/E7080-G000-317/ LEAP-011). Trials, record NCT03898180. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03898180

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of First-line Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) With Lenvatinib (MK-7902/E7080) in Urothelial Carcinoma Cisplatin-ineligible Participants Whose Tumors Express Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 and in Participants Ineligible for Platinum-containing Chemotherapy (MK-7902-011/E7080-G000-317/ LEAP-011)
NCT number
NCT03898180
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
505 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Conditions
Urothelial Carcinoma
Interventions
Pembrolizumab, Lenvatinib, Placebo for lenvatinib
First posted
2019-04-01
Last updated
2026-02-05
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2018-003752-21
Results first posted
2023-10-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)Up to approximately 25 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented PD per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. PFS as assessed by BICR per RECIST 1.1 is presented. Protocol-specified final analysis for this primary outcome measure was performed with an analysis data cut-off date of Jul-26-2021.
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)Up to approximately 25 months
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were to be censored at the date of the last follow-up. Protocol-specified final analysis for this primary outcome measure was performed with an analysis data cut-off date of Jul-26-2021.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR)Up to approximately 25 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a confirmed CR (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR. The percentage of participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented. Protocol-specified final analysis for this secondary outcome measure was performed with an analysis data cut-off date of Jul-26-2021.
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR)Up to approximately 25 months
For participants who demonstrated a confirmed CR (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of a CR or PR until PD or death. DOR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was to be censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions as well as an absolute increase of ≥5 mm in the sum of diameters. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. The DOR as assessed by BICR per RECIST 1.1 for participants who experienced a confirmed CR or PR is presented. Protocol-specified final analysis for this secondary outcome measure was performed with an analysis data cut-off date of Jul-26-2021.
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR)Up to approximately 25 months
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who have a CR (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) or stable disease (SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD \[PD: ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD\]). DCR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was to be censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. The DCR as assessed by BICR per RECIST 1.1 is presented. Protocol-specified final analysis for this secondary outcome measure was performed with an analysis data cut-off date of Jul-26-2021.
Secondary
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS) (Item 29) and Quality of Life (QOL) (Item 30) Combined Score
Baseline and Week 11
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QOL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The change from baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 29) and QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 30) combined score is presented. A higher score indicates a better outcome. Final analysis for this secondary outcome measure was performed with an analysis data cut-off date of Jul-26-2021, as specified in the Supplemental Statistical Analysis Plan (sSAP).
SecondaryTime to True Deterioration (TTD) Based on Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS (Item 29) and QOL (Item 30) Combined ScoreBaseline and up to approximately 25 months
TTD was defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 29) \& QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 30) combined score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QOL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in GHS and QOL combined score, is presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome. Final analysis for this secondary outcome measure was performed with an analysis data cut-off date of Jul-26-2021, as specified in the sSAP.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experience an AEUp to approximately 25 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The number of participants who experienced an AE is presented. Final analysis for this secondary outcome measure was performed with an analysis data cut-off date of Jul-26-2021.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an AEUp to approximately 25 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented. Final analysis for this secondary outcome measure was performed with an analysis data cut-off date of Jul-26-2021.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival (PFS)Up to approximately 25 monthsAll participants randomized prior to the protocol-specified primary completion analysis data cut-off.MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS)Up to approximately 25 monthsAll participants randomized prior to the protocol-specified primary completion analysis data cut-off.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYObjective Response Rate (ORR)Up to approximately 25 monthsAll participants randomized prior to the protocol-specified primary completion analysis data cut-off.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DOR)Up to approximately 25 monthsAll participants randomized prior to the protocol-specified primary completion analysis data cut-off and who also experienced a confirmed CR or partial response.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDisease Control Rate (DCR)Up to approximately 25 monthsAll participants randomized prior to the protocol-specified primary completion analysis data cut-off.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS) (Item 29) and Quality of Life (QOL) (Item 30) Combined Score
Baseline and Week 11
All participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment prior to the primary completion analysis data cut-off and who also had data available from at least 1 EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 29 and 30 assessment.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTime to True Deterioration (TTD) Based on Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS (Item 29) and QOL (Item 30) Combined ScoreBaseline and up to approximately 25 months
All participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment prior to the primary completion analysis data cut-off and who also had data available from baseline and ≥1 post-baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 29 and 30 assessments.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Experience an AEUp to approximately 25 monthsAll participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment prior to the primary completion analysis data cut-off.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an AEUp to approximately 25 monthsAll participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment prior to the primary completion analysis data cut-off.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib4.595% Confidence Interval 4.0 to 6.0Months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Pembrolizumab + Placebo4.095% Confidence Interval 2.7 to 5.4Months
Overall Survival (OS)Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib11.895% Confidence Interval 9.1 to 15.1Months
Overall Survival (OS)Pembrolizumab + Placebo12.995% Confidence Interval 9.8 to 17.8Months
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib33.195% Confidence Interval 27.2 to 39.3Percentage of Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Pembrolizumab + Placebo28.995% Confidence Interval 23.3 to 35.1Percentage of Participants
Duration of Response (DOR)Pembrolizumab + LenvatinibNAFull Range NA to NAMonths
Duration of Response (DOR)Pembrolizumab + PlaceboNAFull Range NA to NAMonths
Disease Control Rate (DCR)Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib66.995% Confidence Interval 60.7 to 72.8Percentage of Participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR)Pembrolizumab + Placebo56.295% Confidence Interval 49.7 to 62.5Percentage of Participants

Participant flow14

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPembrolizumab + Lenvatinib251
Overall StudySTARTEDPembrolizumab + Placebo254
Overall StudyTreatedPembrolizumab + Lenvatinib247
Overall StudyTreatedPembrolizumab + Placebo254
Overall StudyPembrolizumab + Lenvatinib vs. Pembrolizumab + Placebo Efficacy AnalysesPembrolizumab + Lenvatinib245
Overall StudyPembrolizumab + Lenvatinib vs. Pembrolizumab + Placebo Efficacy AnalysesPembrolizumab + Placebo242
Overall StudyPembrolizumab + Lenvatinib vs. Pembrolizumab + Placebo Safety AnalysesPembrolizumab + Lenvatinib241
Overall StudyPembrolizumab + Lenvatinib vs. Pembrolizumab + Placebo Safety AnalysesPembrolizumab + Placebo242
Overall StudyReceived Second Course of PembrolizumabPembrolizumab + Lenvatinib2
Overall StudyReceived Second Course of PembrolizumabPembrolizumab + Placebo5

Adverse events1,056

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab First Course4824757
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo + Pembrolizumab First Course6425474
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab → Pembrolizumab Second Course020
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo + Pembrolizumab → Pembrolizumab Second Course050
otherHyperthyroidismEndocrine disordersLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab First Course1624717
otherHyperthyroidismEndocrine disordersPlacebo + Pembrolizumab First Course1225413
otherHyperthyroidismEndocrine disordersLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab → Pembrolizumab Second Course020
otherHyperthyroidismEndocrine disordersPlacebo + Pembrolizumab → Pembrolizumab Second Course050
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disordersLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab First Course98247109
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disordersPlacebo + Pembrolizumab First Course2725430

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab First Course178251
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo + Pembrolizumab First Course175254
Total, all-cause mortalityLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab → Pembrolizumab Second Course02
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo + Pembrolizumab → Pembrolizumab Second Course05
Total, other adverse eventsLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab First Course238247
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo + Pembrolizumab First Course236254
Total, other adverse eventsLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab → Pembrolizumab Second Course12
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo + Pembrolizumab → Pembrolizumab Second Course55
Total, serious adverse eventsLenvatinib + Pembrolizumab First Course155247
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo + Pembrolizumab First Course116254

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
33300372DERIVEDPubMed
37778952RESULTPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib vs Pembrolizumab + Placebo: Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an AETrial comparisons
Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib vs Pembrolizumab + Placebo: Number of Participants Who Experience an AETrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03898180

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03898180/events?page=2