ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03909971

A Study of Lorlatinib in ALK Inhibitor-Treated ALK-Positive NSCLC in China

NCT03909971, Phase 2, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2021-10-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Lorlatinib in ALK Inhibitor-Treated ALK-Positive NSCLC in China. Trials, record NCT03909971. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03909971

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Lorlatinib in ALK Inhibitor-Treated ALK-Positive NSCLC in China
NCT number
NCT03909971
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
109 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Interventions
Lorlatinib
First posted
2019-04-10
Last updated
2025-11-05
Results first posted
2021-10-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes28

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (Cohort 1)From Cycle 1 Day 1 to documented progression of disease by ICR (up to 67 weeks)
Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall confirmed response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1 relative to the total participants in the analysis population. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as a greater than equal to (\>=) 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Independent Central Radiology (ICR) was used for disease progression assessment.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (Cohort 2)From Cycle 1 Day 1 to documented progression of disease by ICR (up to 67 weeks)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall confirmed response of CR or PR according to RECIST version 1.1 relative to the total participants in the analysis population. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as a \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. ICR was used for disease progression assessment.
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on ICR AssessmentFrom first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented PD by ICR, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to first documentation of objective disease progression (PD) or to death due to any cause, whichever came first. PD: at least a \>=20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants without documentation of PD, or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method. ICR was used for disease progression assessment.
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival Based on Investigator AssessmentFrom first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented progression of disease by investigator, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to first documentation of objective PD or to death due to any cause, whichever came first. PD: at least a \>=20 % increase in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants without documentation of PD, or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method. Investigator assessment was used for disease progression assessment.
SecondaryOverall SurvivalFrom first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to date of death due to any cause (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)Overall survival was defined as the time from first dose to the date of death due to any cause. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Intracranial Objective Response (IC-OR) Based on ICR AssessmentFrom first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented PD by ICR (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
IC-OR: percentage of participants with a best overall confirmed intracranial response of CR or PR according to RECIST version 1.1 relative to total participants in the analysis population but limited to intra cranial lesions only in participants with central nervous system metastases. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Intracranial Objective Response Based on Investigator AssessmentFrom first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented progression of disease by investigator (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
IC-OR: percentage of participants with a best overall confirmed intracranial response of CR or PR according to RECIST version 1.1 relative to total participants in the analysis population but limited to intra cranial lesions only in participants with central nervous system metastases. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson method
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) Based on ICR AssessmentFrom first documentation of CR or PR to documented progression of disease by ICR, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
DOR: time from first documentation of CR or PR to first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10mm. PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference baseline sum longest dimensions. PD:\>=20 % increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since treatment started, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to relative increase of 20% sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm and for non-target lesions PD: unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants without documentation of PD, or death at time of analysis were censored at date of last tumor assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.
SecondaryDOR Based on Investigator AssessmentFrom first documentation of CR or PR to documented PD by investigator, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure
DOR: time from first documentation of CR or PR to first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10mm. PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference baseline sum longest dimensions. PD:\>=20 % increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since treatment started, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to relative increase of 20% sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm and for non-target lesions PD: unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants without documentation of PD, or death at time of analysis were censored at date of last tumor assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.
SecondaryDuration of Intracranial Response Based on ICR AssessmentFrom first documentation of CR or PR to documented progression of disease by ICR, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
Duration of intracranial response: time from first documentation of CR or PR considering only lesions having disease site=brain to first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, participants who had at least 1 intracranial lesion.CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in \<10mm.PR:\>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking reference the baseline sum longest dimension. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesion, or appearance of one or more new lesion. In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm and for non-target lesion PD: unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion, or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants without documentation of PD, or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Kaplan Meier method was used.

Outcomes28

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (Cohort 1)From Cycle 1 Day 1 to documented progression of disease by ICR (up to 67 weeks)The analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of lorlatinib.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (Cohort 1)-Final AnalysisFrom first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented disease progression by ICR (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of lorlatinib.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (Cohort 2)From Cycle 1 Day 1 to documented progression of disease by ICR (up to 67 weeks)The analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of loratinib.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on ICR AssessmentFrom first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented PD by ICR, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of lorlatinib.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression-Free Survival Based on Investigator AssessmentFrom first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented progression of disease by investigator, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of lorlatinib.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall SurvivalFrom first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to date of death due to any cause (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of lorlatinib.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Intracranial Objective Response (IC-OR) Based on ICR AssessmentFrom first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented PD by ICR (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of lorlatinib. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants for whom the brain lesions were chosen as RECIST target or non-target lesions at baseline and who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Intracranial Objective Response Based on Investigator AssessmentFrom first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented progression of disease by investigator (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of lorlatinib. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants for whom the brain lesions were chosen as RECIST target or non-target lesions at baseline and who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DOR) Based on ICR AssessmentFrom first documentation of CR or PR to documented progression of disease by ICR, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of lorlatinib. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDOR Based on Investigator AssessmentFrom first documentation of CR or PR to documented PD by investigator, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure
The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of lorlatinib. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
MonthsMEDIAN

Results by group205

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Cohort 1)Cohort 170.195% Confidence Interval 57.7 to 80.7Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Cohort 1)-Final AnalysisCohort 179.195% Confidence Interval 67.4 to 88.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Cohort 2)Cohort 247.695% Confidence Interval 32.0 to 63.6Percentage of participants
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on ICR AssessmentCohort 126.395% Confidence Interval 16.6 to NAMonths
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on ICR AssessmentCohort 25.695% Confidence Interval 2.9 to 12.4Months
Progression-Free Survival Based on Investigator AssessmentCohort 126.395% Confidence Interval 15.2 to 52.4Months
Progression-Free Survival Based on Investigator AssessmentCohort 26.995% Confidence Interval 4.2 to 13.7Months
Overall SurvivalCohort 1NA95% Confidence Interval 42.7 to NAMonths
Overall SurvivalCohort 221.995% Confidence Interval 11.9 to 44.1Months
Percentage of Participants With Intracranial Objective Response (IC-OR) Based on ICR AssessmentCohort 183.895% Confidence Interval 68.0 to 93.8Percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort 167
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort 242
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCohort 10
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCohort 20
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCohort 167
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCohort 242

Adverse events244

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 13167
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 21542
otherAtrioventricular block first degreeCardiac disordersCohort 1467
otherAtrioventricular block first degreeCardiac disordersCohort 2342
otherSinus bradycardiaCardiac disordersCohort 1667
otherSinus bradycardiaCardiac disordersCohort 2542
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersCohort 1867
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersCohort 2342
otherVentricular extrasystolesCardiac disordersCohort 1167
otherVentricular extrasystolesCardiac disordersCohort 2442

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort 12867
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort 22642
Total, other adverse eventsCohort 16767
Total, other adverse eventsCohort 24242
Total, serious adverse eventsCohort 12367
Total, serious adverse eventsCohort 21642

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
38344203DERIVEDPubMed
38879393DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Cohort 1 vs Cohort 2: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Cohort 1 vs Cohort 2: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03909971

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03909971/registered?page=2