ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03928184

Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes in Evaluating Lorecivivint (SM04690) for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

NCT03928184, Phase 3, Completed, Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc.; results first posted 2026-02-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes in Evaluating Lorecivivint (SM04690) for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. Trials, record NCT03928184. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03928184

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes in Evaluating Lorecivivint (SM04690) for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT number
NCT03928184
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
501 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc.
Conditions
Knee Osteoarthritis
Interventions
Lorecivivint, Placebo
First posted
2019-04-26
Last updated
2026-02-13
Results first posted
2026-02-13
Limitations and caveats
This trial was conducted during COVID-19 and its confounding effects on clinical outcomes in knee OA patients based on observational data have been reported (Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020;28(8):2435-43). Structural progression enrichment, leading to a severely damaged OA population in the OA-11 trial, might have confounded short-term therapeutic pain detection and repeat dosing may be required to demonstrate clinical benefit in severely damaged OA populations.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)Baseline and Week 12
Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly averages of daily pain numeric rating scale (NRS). The pain NRS is an 11-point scale \[0-10\] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)Baseline and Week 24
Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly averages of daily pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The pain NRS is an 11-point scale \[0-10\] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)Baseline and Week 52
Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly averages of daily pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The pain NRS is an 11-point scale \[0-10\] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)Baseline and Week 12
Evaluate change from baseline OA function in the target knee as assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscore (WOMAC Function). The WOMAC is a widely-used, proprietary outcome measurement tool used to evaluate the condition of subjects with OA of the knee and hip, including pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical functioning (17 questions) of the joints. Each question is measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (lowest pain/lowest stiffness/highest function) to 10 (highest pain/highest stiffness/lowest function). The WOMAC Function raw subscore ranges from 0 to 170, and is scaled 0 (highest overall function) to 100 (lowest overall function) for analysis and reporting.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)Baseline and Week 24
Evaluate change from baseline OA function in the target knee as assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscore (WOMAC Function). The WOMAC is a widely-used, proprietary outcome measurement tool used to evaluate the condition of subjects with OA of the knee and hip, including pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical functioning (17 questions) of the joints. Each question is measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (lowest pain/lowest stiffness/highest function) to 10 (highest pain/highest stiffness/lowest function). The WOMAC Function raw subscore ranges from 0 to 170, and is scaled 0 (highest overall function) to 100 (lowest overall function) for analysis and reporting.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)Baseline and Week 52
Evaluate change from baseline OA function in the target knee as assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscore (WOMAC Function). The WOMAC is a widely-used, proprietary outcome measurement tool used to evaluate the condition of subjects with OA of the knee and hip, including pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical functioning (17 questions) of the joints. Each question is measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (lowest pain/lowest stiffness/highest function) to 10 (highest pain/highest stiffness/lowest function). The WOMAC Function raw subscore ranges from 0 to 170, and is scaled 0 (highest overall function) to 100 (lowest overall function) for analysis and reporting.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment)Baseline and Week 12
Evaluate change from baseline OA disease activity as assessed by Patient Global Assessment. The Patient Global Assessment is an 11-point \[0-10\] Numeric Rating Scale \[NRS\] on which the subjects will rate how they feel their target knee OA is doing, considering all the ways in which their target knee OA may affect them. The NRS is anchored by descriptors at each end ("Very Good" on the left and "Very Bad" on the right). For analysis, Patient Global Assessment scores were scaled to \[0-100\], where 0 represents "Very Good" and 100 represents "Very Bad".
SecondaryChange From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment)Baseline and Week 24
Evaluate change from baseline OA disease activity as assessed by Patient Global Assessment. The Patient Global Assessment is an 11-point \[0-10\] Numeric Rating Scale \[NRS\] on which the subjects will rate how they feel their target knee OA is doing, considering all the ways in which their target knee OA may affect them. The NRS is anchored by descriptors at each end ("Very Good" on the left and "Very Bad" on the right). For analysis, Patient Global Assessment scores were scaled to \[0-100\], where 0 represents "Very Good" and 100 represents "Very Bad".
SecondaryChange From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment)Baseline and Week 52
Evaluate change from baseline OA disease activity as assessed by Patient Global Assessment. The Patient Global Assessment is an 11-point \[0-10\] Numeric Rating Scale \[NRS\] on which the subjects will rate how they feel their target knee OA is doing, considering all the ways in which their target knee OA may affect them. The NRS is anchored by descriptors at each end ("Very Good" on the left and "Very Bad" on the right). For analysis, Patient Global Assessment scores were scaled to \[0-100\], where 0 represents "Very Good" and 100 represents "Very Bad".
OtherChange From Baseline in Medial Joint Space Width (mJSW) in the Target KneeBaseline and Week 52Evaluate change from baseline in mJSW as documented by radiograph of the target knee

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)Baseline and Week 12Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)Baseline and Week 24Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)Baseline and Week 52Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)Baseline and Week 12Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)Baseline and Week 24Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)Baseline and Week 52Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment)Baseline and Week 12Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment)Baseline and Week 24Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment)Baseline and Week 52Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDChange From Baseline in Medial Joint Space Width (mJSW) in the Target KneeBaseline and Week 52Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation.mmLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group20

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)0.07 mg Lorecivivint-2.24Standard Error 0.13units on a scale
Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)Vehicle-2.49Standard Error 0.13units on a scale
Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)0.07 mg Lorecivivint-2.42Standard Error 0.14units on a scale
Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)Vehicle-2.56Standard Error 0.13units on a scale
Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)0.07 mg Lorecivivint-2.31Standard Error 0.14units on a scale
Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)Vehicle-2.47Standard Error 0.14units on a scale
Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)0.07 mg Lorecivivint-21.87Standard Error 1.34units on a scale
Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)Vehicle-23.67Standard Error 1.34units on a scale
Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)0.07 mg Lorecivivint-23.07Standard Error 1.42units on a scale
Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)Vehicle-23.93Standard Error 1.41units on a scale

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTED0.07 mg Lorecivivint248
Overall StudySTARTEDVehicle253
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set0.07 mg Lorecivivint249
Overall StudySafety Analysis SetVehicle252
Overall StudyCOMPLETED0.07 mg Lorecivivint224
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVehicle223
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED0.07 mg Lorecivivint24
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVehicle30

Adverse events90

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0.07 mg Lorecivivint1924921
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVehicle1725219
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestations0.07 mg Lorecivivint1624917
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsVehicle1325213
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0.07 mg Lorecivivint1324914
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVehicle825210
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestations0.07 mg Lorecivivint1124911
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsVehicle72527
otherJoint swellingMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0.07 mg Lorecivivint72498
otherJoint swellingMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVehicle42524

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality0.07 mg Lorecivivint1249
Total, all-cause mortalityVehicle0252
Total, other adverse events0.07 mg Lorecivivint85249
Total, other adverse eventsVehicle81252
Total, serious adverse events0.07 mg Lorecivivint12249
Total, serious adverse eventsVehicle13252

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
39495154DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
0.07 mg Lorecivivint vs Vehicle: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
0.07 mg Lorecivivint vs Vehicle: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03928184

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03928184/events?page=2