ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03933202

A Study of Suboptimally Controlled Participants Previously Taking Oral or Infusion DMDs for RMS (MASTER-2)

NCT03933202, Completed, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.; results first posted 2026-01-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Suboptimally Controlled Participants Previously Taking Oral or Infusion DMDs for RMS (MASTER-2). Trials, record NCT03933202. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03933202

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Suboptimally Controlled Participants Previously Taking Oral or Infusion DMDs for RMS (MASTER-2)
NCT number
NCT03933202
Status
Completed
Enrollment
291 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
Conditions
Multiple Sclerosis
Interventions
Cladribine Tablets
First posted
2019-05-01
Last updated
2026-01-02
Results first posted
2026-01-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes26

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR)From first dose of cladribine tablets up to 24 months
A relapse was defined as per routine clinical practice as determined by the investigator. As a guide, relapse may be defined as exacerbation of symptoms that occur over a minimum of 24 hours and separated from a previous attack by at least 30 days, in the absence of fever or infection. ARR was calculated as the total number of reported relapses in the 24 months after treatment divided by the days on study corresponding to relapse information and multiplied by 365.25.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The TSQM-14 was a participant-rated scale used to assess subjective satisfaction with medication. The TSQM has 14 questions that assesses participants' global satisfaction level with their treatment in 4 domains: side effects (There are 5 questions in the side effects domain, however one of them is a Yes/No question and there are 4 sub-components, hence a maximum score of 20), effectiveness (3 questions), global satisfaction (3 questions), and convenience (3 questions). All questions are scored from 1 (least satisfied) to 5 or 7 (most satisfied). The total score is summed for each domain to obtain: side effects (1-20), effectiveness (1-21), global satisfaction (1-17), and convenience (1-21), using transformed scores between 0 and 100. Lower total scores in each domain indicate dissatisfaction with the study medication and higher total scores indicate satisfaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The SF-36 Health Survey is a validated, self-administered questionnaire designed to assess general health status across eight domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. It includes one item evaluating perceived change in health over the past year and generates two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-derived using factor analytic methods. Each domain and summary score is scaled from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale - 5-item Version (MFIS-5) Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The MFIS-5 is a shortened version of the Fatigue Impact Scale consisting of 5 items that assess the impact of fatigue on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 (Never), 1 (Rarely), 2 (Sometimes), 3 (Often), and 4 (Almost always). The total score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of fatigue. Items include: reduced alertness, limitations in activities away from home, difficulty sustaining physical effort, reduced ability to complete tasks requiring physical effort, and trouble concentrating.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 7-Item Beck-Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS) Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The 7-item Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS) is a self-report tool used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. It includes seven items: Sadness, Pessimism, Past Failure, Loss of Pleasure, Self-Dislike, Self-Criticalness, and Suicidal Thoughts. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. The total score ranges from 0 to 21 and is calculated by summing the highest-rated response for each item.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percentage of Work Time Missed Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-item validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in percentage of work time missed (absenteeism) was reported.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percentage of Impairment While Working Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-item validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in percentage of impairment while working (presentisms) was reported.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percentage of Overall Work Impairment Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-item validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in total percentage of work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms) were reported.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percentage of Activity Impairment Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment- Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-item validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in percentage of activity impairment was reported.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) Scale Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The PDDS is a patient-reported scale to assess the disability status in participants with MS, and it focuses mainly on how participants walk. Scores on the PDDS range from 0 (normal) to 8 (bedridden): 0 (Normal), 1 (Mild Disability), 2 (Moderate Disability), 3 (Gait Disability), 4 (Early Cane), 5 (Late Cane), 6 (Bilateral Support), 7 (Wheelchair/Scooter), and 8 (Bedridden). A higher score represents higher level of disability.

Outcomes26

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of cladribine tablets. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of cladribine tablets. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale - 5-item Version (MFIS-5) Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of cladribine tablets. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 7-Item Beck-Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS) Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of cladribine tablets. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Percentage of Work Time Missed Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of cladribine tablets. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints.
percentage of work time missedMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Percentage of Impairment While Working Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of cladribine tablets. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints.
percentage of impairment while workingMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Percentage of Overall Work Impairment Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of cladribine tablets. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints.
percentage of overall work impairmentMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Percentage of Activity Impairment Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment- Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of cladribine tablets. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints.
percentage of activity impairmentMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) Scale Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
The FAS included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of cladribine tablets. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Adherence to Treatment as Assessed by Modified Versions of the Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (MS-TAQ)Month 1, 2, 13 and 14
The FAS included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of cladribine tablets. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group157

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Cladribine Tablets: Switch From OralGlobal Satisfaction: Month 618.5Standard Deviation 30.42units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Cladribine Tablets: Switch From InfusionGlobal Satisfaction: Month 622.2Standard Deviation 15.14units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Cladribine Tablets: Switch From OralGlobal Satisfaction: Month 1211.1Standard Deviation 25.95units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Cladribine Tablets: Switch From InfusionGlobal Satisfaction: Month 1219.0Standard Deviation 21.82units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Cladribine Tablets: Switch From OralGlobal Satisfaction: Month 2416.1Standard Deviation 24.31units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Cladribine Tablets: Switch From InfusionGlobal Satisfaction: Month 24-28.6Standard Deviation NAunits on a scale
Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Cladribine Tablets: Switch From OralEffectiveness: Month 610.5Standard Deviation 29.13units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Cladribine Tablets: Switch From InfusionEffectiveness: Month 622.2Standard Deviation 21.08units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Cladribine Tablets: Switch From OralEffectiveness: Month 123.9Standard Deviation 24.09units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24Cladribine Tablets: Switch From InfusionEffectiveness: Month 1224.1Standard Deviation 30.60units on a scale

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral163
Overall StudySTARTEDCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion120
Overall StudyParticipants Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Cladribine TabletsCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral103
Overall StudyParticipants Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Cladribine TabletsCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion85
Overall StudySwitch From OcrelizumabCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral0
Overall StudySwitch From OcrelizumabCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion53
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral116
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion92
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral47
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion28

Adverse events418

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral1103
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion085
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral20103
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion485
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral1103
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion085
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral0103
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion185
otherLeft ventricular dysfunctionCardiac disordersCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral1103
otherLeft ventricular dysfunctionCardiac disordersCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion085

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral2103
Total, all-cause mortalityCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion085
Total, other adverse eventsCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral65103
Total, other adverse eventsCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion5185
Total, serious adverse eventsCladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral10103
Total, serious adverse eventsCladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion1485

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
33517769DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Cladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral vs Cladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion: Number of Participants With At Least One Concomitant MedicationTrial comparisons
Cladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral vs Cladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Cladribine Tablets: Switch From Oral vs Cladribine Tablets: Switch From Infusion: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03933202

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03933202/registered?page=2