ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03959241

TAC/MTX vs. TAC/MMF/PTCY for Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease and Microbiome and Immune Reconstitution Study (BMT CTN 1703/1801)

NCT03959241, Phase 3, Completed, Medical College of Wisconsin; results first posted 2024-01-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. TAC/MTX vs. TAC/MMF/PTCY for Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease and Microbiome and Immune Reconstitution Study (BMT CTN 1703/1801). Trials, record NCT03959241. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03959241

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
TAC/MTX vs. TAC/MMF/PTCY for Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease and Microbiome and Immune Reconstitution Study (BMT CTN 1703/1801)
NCT number
NCT03959241
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
431 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Conditions
Acute Leukemia, Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML), Myelodysplasia, Lymphoma
Interventions
Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Methotrexate, Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil/Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide, Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Cyclophosphamide
First posted
2019-05-22
Last updated
2024-04-04
Results first posted
2024-01-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes24

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS) at One Year1 year post randomization
The primary endpoint is GRFS as a time to event endpoint from randomization. All randomized patients will be followed for one year; however, the primary endpoint will be analyzed as a time to event endpoint. The primary analysis will be done using the randomized population. An event for this time to event outcome is defined as grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic immune suppression, disease relapse or progression, or death by any cause, whichever comes first. Time to event analyses were conducted. An unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis was done. Additionally, a multivariate Cox regression model adjusting for the following pre-specified covariates: age group (\< 65 vs. 65+), disease risk index (low, intermediate, high/very high), planned RIC conditioning regimen (Fludarabine/Busulfan, Fludarabine/Melphalan, Other), donor type/HLA matching score (related 6/6, unrelated 7/8, unrelated 8/8), and planned use of post-transplant maintenance therapy (Yes vs. no).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Grades II-IV and III-IV Acute GVHD at Day 100 Post-transplantDays 100 post-transplant
Acute GVHD was graded according to Mount Sinai aGVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) Criteria (Harris et al. 2016) with higher grade indicating worse outcomes. Grade I aGVHD is defined as Skin stage 1-2 and stage 0 for both GI and liver. Grade II is stage 3 skin, stage 1 GI, or stage 1 liver. Grade III is stage 2-3 GI or stage 2-3 liver. Grade IV is stage 4 skin or stage 4 liver. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV and III-IV at Day 100 was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator with 95% confidence intervals, treating death prior to aGVHD as a competing event. The cumulative incidences of Minnesota standard and high risk aGVHD at Day 100 were determined with 95% confidence intervals. Time to aGVHD is defined as time from transplant until onset of grades II-IV and III-IV aGVHD, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to compare the treatment groups, with adjustment for same baseline characteristics as for the primary endpoint.
SecondaryParticipants With Maximum Acute GVHD at One Year Post-transplantOne year post-transplant
Acute GVHD were graded according to Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) Criteria (Harris et al. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2016; 22:4-10). The higher acute GVHD grade indicates worse outcomes. Grade 0 is no acute GVHD of any organ. Grade I acute GVHD is defined as Skin stage of 1-2 and stage 0 for both GI and liver organs. Grade II is stage 3 of skin, or stage 1 of GI, or stage 1 of liver. Grade III is stage 2-3 for GI, or stage 2-3 of liver. Grade IV is stage 4 of skin, or stage 4 of liver. Max acute GVHD by one-year post-transplant was computed.
SecondaryParticipants With Maximum Stage of Skin, Lower GI, and Liver at Day 100 Post-transplantDay 100 post-transplant
Organ stages were graded according to Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) Criteria (Harris et al. 2016). Higher stage in any organ indicates worse outcomes. For skin, stage 0-no GVHD rash; 1-Maculopapular Rash \<25% BSA; 2-Maculopapular Rash 25-50% BSA; 3-Maculopapular Rash \>50% BSA; 4-Generalized Erythroderma Plus Bullous Formation and Desquamation \>5% BSA. For Lower GI, 0-No Diarrhea or Diarrhea-Adult: \<500 mL/day, \<3 Episodes/day; Child: \<10 mL/kg/day, \<4 Episodes/day; 1-Diarrhea-Adult: 500-999 mL/day, 3-4 Episodes/day; Child: 10-19.9 mL/kg/day, 4-6 Episodes/day; 2-Diarrhea-Adult: 1000-1500 mL/day, 5-7 Episodes/day; Child: 20-30 mL/kg/day, 7-10 Episodes/day; 3-Diarrhea-Adult: \>1500 mL/day, \>7 Episodes/day; Child: \>30 mL/kg/day, \>10 Episodes/day; 4-Severe Abdominal Pain With or Without Ileus or Grossly Bloody Stool. For liver, 0-Bilirubin \<2.0 mg/dL; 1-Bilirubin 2.0-3.0 mg/dL; 2-Bilirubin 3.1-6.0 mg/dL; 3-Bilirubin 6.1-15.0 mg/dL; 4-Bilirubin \>15.0 mg/dL
SecondaryParticipants With Maximum Stage of Upper GI at Day 100 Post-transplantDay 100 post-transplant
Organ stages were graded according to Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) Criteria (Harris et al. 2016). Higher stage in any organ indicates worse outcomes. For upper GI, stage 0 is no or intermittent nausea, vomiting, or anorexia; stage 1 is persistent nausea, vomiting, or anorexia. The maximum stages of Upper GI at patient level were summarized at Day 100.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD Post-transplant6, 12 months post-transplant
Percentage of participants with chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at one-year will be estimated with 95% confidence intervals for each treatment group using the cumulative incidence estimate with the complementary log-log transformation, treating death prior to cGVHD as a competing event. Chronic GVHD is based on NIH Consensus Criteria (2014 NIH Consensus Criteria) and includes mild, moderate and severe chronic GVHD. Eight organs were scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of cGVHD involvement. Liver and pulmonary function test results and use of systemic therapy for treatment of cGVHD were also recorded. Assessment of cGVHD occurred up to one-year post-transplant. This endpoint considers any cGVHD onset. A multivariate Cox regression model for the cause-specific hazard of cGVHD was used to compare the treatment groups, after adjustment for baseline characteristics as described for the primary endpoint.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Chronic GVHD With Maximum Severity at 12 Months Post-transplant12 months post-transplant
Chronic GVHD data were collected directly from providers and chart review as defined by the NIH Consensus Conference Criteria. Eight organs were scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of chronic GVHD involvement per the NIH global severity scores of mild, moderate and severe chronic GVHD. The maximum severity of chronic GVHD through 12 months post-transplant will be tabulated by treatment arm.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Immunosuppression-Free Survival (ISFS) at 1 Year Post-transplant1 year post-transplant
Participants who are alive, relapse-free, and do not need ongoing immune suppression (IS) to control GVHD at one year post-transplant are considered successes for the endpoint immunosuppression-free survival (ISFS). Immune suppression is defined as any systemic agents used to control or suppress GVHD. Corticosteroid doses greater than 10 mg were considered active systemic immune suppression treatment. Participants who discontinued immune suppression within 15 days or less prior to the 1-year time point was considered to be on immune suppression for this endpoint.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Immunosuppression-Free Survival (ISFS) at 1 Year Post-transplant1 year post-transplant
Participants who are alive, relapse-free, and do not need ongoing immune suppression to control GVHD at one year post-transplant are considered successes for the endpoint immunosuppression-free survival (ISFS). Percentage of participants alive, relapse free, and off immune suppression at 1 year post-transplant were described for each treatment group, along with 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery Post-transplantDays 28 and day 100 post-transplant
Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 500/mm\^3 for three consecutive measurements on three different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil recovery. The competing event is death without neutrophil recovery. For participants who never drop ANC below 500/mm\^3, the date of neutrophil recovery will be Day +1 post-transplant. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil recovery by Day 28 and Day 100 was described for each treatment group with point estimates and 95% confidence intervals using the complementary log-log transformation and treating death as a competing event.

Outcomes24

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS) at One Year1 year post randomizationAnalysis Population includes all randomized participantspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Grades II-IV and III-IV Acute GVHD at Day 100 Post-transplantDays 100 post-transplantAnalysis Population includes transplanted participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYParticipants With Maximum Acute GVHD at One Year Post-transplantOne year post-transplantAnalysis Population includes transplanted participantsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYParticipants With Maximum Stage of Skin, Lower GI, and Liver at Day 100 Post-transplantDay 100 post-transplantAnalysis Population includes transplanted participantsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYParticipants With Maximum Stage of Upper GI at Day 100 Post-transplantDay 100 post-transplantAnalysis Population includes transplanted participantsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD Post-transplant6, 12 months post-transplantAnalysis Population includes transplanted participantspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Experiencing Chronic GVHD With Maximum Severity at 12 Months Post-transplant12 months post-transplantAnalysis Population includes transplanted participantsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Immunosuppression-Free Survival (ISFS) at 1 Year Post-transplant1 year post-transplantAnalysis Population includes transplanted and evaluable participants for ISFSParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Immunosuppression-Free Survival (ISFS) at 1 Year Post-transplant1 year post-transplantAnalysis Population includes transplanted and evaluable participants for ISFS.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery Post-transplantDays 28 and day 100 post-transplantAnalysis Population includes transplanted participantspercentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group220

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS) at One YearPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF52.395% Confidence Interval 45.2 to 58.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS) at One YearTacrolimus/Methotrexate35.595% Confidence Interval 29.1 to 42.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Grades II-IV and III-IV Acute GVHD at Day 100 Post-transplantPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMFMAGIC aGVHD Grade II-IV53.895% Confidence Interval 46.7 to 60.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Grades II-IV and III-IV Acute GVHD at Day 100 Post-transplantTacrolimus/MethotrexateMAGIC aGVHD Grade II-IV51.995% Confidence Interval 44.9 to 58.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Grades II-IV and III-IV Acute GVHD at Day 100 Post-transplantPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMFMAGIC aGVHD Grade III-IV6.395% Confidence Interval 3.5 to 10.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Grades II-IV and III-IV Acute GVHD at Day 100 Post-transplantTacrolimus/MethotrexateMAGIC aGVHD Grade III-IV14.795% Confidence Interval 10.3 to 19.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Grades II-IV and III-IV Acute GVHD at Day 100 Post-transplantPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMFStandard risk aGVHD64.195% Confidence Interval 57.1 to 70.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Grades II-IV and III-IV Acute GVHD at Day 100 Post-transplantTacrolimus/MethotrexateStandard risk aGVHD64.395% Confidence Interval 57.4 to 70.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Grades II-IV and III-IV Acute GVHD at Day 100 Post-transplantPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMFHigh risk aGVHD13.195% Confidence Interval 8.9 to 18.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Grades II-IV and III-IV Acute GVHD at Day 100 Post-transplantTacrolimus/MethotrexateHigh risk aGVHD18.595% Confidence Interval 13.6 to 24.0percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF214
Overall StudySTARTEDTacrolimus/Methotrexate217
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF203
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTacrolimus/Methotrexate208
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF11
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTacrolimus/Methotrexate9

Adverse events76

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherGrades 3-5 General DisordersGeneral disordersPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF5120868
otherGrades 3-5 General DisordersGeneral disordersTacrolimus/Methotrexate4821261
otherGrades 3-5 Immune System DisordersImmune system disordersPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF52085
otherGrades 3-5 Immune System DisordersImmune system disordersTacrolimus/Methotrexate62126
otherGrades 3-5 GI DisordersGastrointestinal disordersPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF5720873
otherGrades 3-5 GI DisordersGastrointestinal disordersTacrolimus/Methotrexate77212116
otherGrades 3-5 Renal DisordersRenal and urinary disordersPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF3320846
otherGrades 3-5 Renal DisordersRenal and urinary disordersTacrolimus/Methotrexate3021242
otherGrades 3-5 Hemorrhagic DisordersVascular disordersPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF1220813
otherGrades 3-5 Hemorrhagic DisordersVascular disordersTacrolimus/Methotrexate1121211

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF58214
Total, all-cause mortalityTacrolimus/Methotrexate70217
Total, other adverse eventsPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF142208
Total, other adverse eventsTacrolimus/Methotrexate149212
Total, serious adverse eventsPTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF7208
Total, serious adverse eventsTacrolimus/Methotrexate14212

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
37342922BACKGROUNDPubMed
39752608DERIVEDPubMed
40305657DERIVEDPubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
U10HL069294Blood & Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Data Coordinating CenterHOROWITZ, MARY MARESCAMEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSINNATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE2011 to 2016

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
PTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF vs Tacrolimus/Methotrexate: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
PTCY/Tacrolimus/MMF vs Tacrolimus/Methotrexate: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03959241

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03959241/registered?page=2