ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03982186

A Study of Different Combination Regimens Including JNJ-73763989 and/or JNJ-56136379 for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

NCT03982186, Phase 2, Completed, Janssen Sciences Ireland UC; results first posted 2024-07-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Different Combination Regimens Including JNJ-73763989 and/or JNJ-56136379 for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection. Trials, record NCT03982186. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03982186

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Different Combination Regimens Including JNJ-73763989 and/or JNJ-56136379 for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
NCT number
NCT03982186
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
471 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
Conditions
Hepatitis B, Chronic
Interventions
JNJ-73763989, Placebo for JNJ-73763989, JNJ-56136379, Placebo for JNJ-56136379, Nucleos(t)ide Analog (NA)
First posted
2019-06-11
Last updated
2025-02-04
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2019-000622-22
Results first posted
2024-07-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes40

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Meeting the Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Treatment Completion Criteria at Week 48Week 48
Percentage of participants meeting the NA treatment completion criteria at Week 48 were reported. A participant was defined as a responder in meeting the NA treatment completion criteria at Week 48, if the following criteria were met based on the clinical laboratory tests performed at Week 44: participants had alanine transaminase (ALT) less than (\<) 3\*upper limit of normal range (ULN); had hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) \< lower limit of quantification (LLOQ); was hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative; had hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) \<10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). Multiple Imputation using a longitudinal multiple regression model was applied to impute missing data.
SecondaryDouble-blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline up to Week 48
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participants administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment.
SecondaryFollow-up Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With TEAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participants administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment.
SecondaryFollow-up Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With TEAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participants administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment.
SecondaryFollow-up Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With TEAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participants administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment.
SecondaryExtended Follow-up Phase: Percentage of Participants With TEAEsExtended Follow up Week 1 to extended follow up Week 48
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participants administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment.
SecondaryDouble-blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Week 48
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose may result in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, and was medically important.
SecondaryFollow-up Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With SAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose may result in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, and was medically important.
SecondaryFollow-up Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With SAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose may result in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, and was medically important.
SecondaryFollow-up Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With SAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose may result in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, and was medically important.

Outcomes40

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Meeting the Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Treatment Completion Criteria at Week 48Week 48
Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) set was defined as all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study treatment excluding those participants impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic defined as those participants who, because of COVID-19 or similar pandemic-related reasons, withdrew prematurely from the study prior to Week 44, or had no efficacy assessment for the primary outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDouble-blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline up to Week 48Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYFollow-up Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With TEAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYFollow-up Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With TEAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments. '0' in the number of participants analyzed field signifies that none of the participant from the double-blind phase entered the respective follow up phase.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYFollow-up Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With TEAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments. '0' in the number of participants analyzed field signifies that none of the participant from the double-blind phase entered the respective follow up phase.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYExtended Follow-up Phase: Percentage of Participants With TEAEsExtended Follow up Week 1 to extended follow up Week 48
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments. '0' in the number of participants analyzed field signifies that none of the participant from the follow up phase entered the extended follow up phase.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDouble-blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Week 48Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYFollow-up Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With SAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYFollow-up Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With SAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments. '0' in the number of participants analyzed field signifies that none of the participant from the double-blind phase entered the respective follow up phase.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYFollow-up Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With SAEsFrom Week 48 up to Week 96
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of any of the study treatments. '0' in the number of participants analyzed field signifies that none of the participant from the double-blind phase entered the respective follow up phase.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group1,355

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Treatment Completion Criteria at Week 48Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 100 mg + JNJ-56136379 250 mg + NA9.490% Confidence Interval 4.36Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Treatment Completion Criteria at Week 48Arm 2: JNJ-73763989 200 mg + Placebo + NA19.190% Confidence Interval 12.76Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Treatment Completion Criteria at Week 48Arm 3: JNJ-73763989 100 mg + Placebo + NA16.390% Confidence Interval 10.33Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Treatment Completion Criteria at Week 48Arm 4: JNJ-73763989 40 mg + Placebo + NA5.590% Confidence Interval 2.19Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Treatment Completion Criteria at Week 48Arm 5: Placebo + JNJ-56136379 250 mg + NA0.090% Confidence Interval 0.00Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Treatment Completion Criteria at Week 48Arm 6: Placebo + Placebo + NA2.290% Confidence Interval 0.11Percentage of participants
Double-blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Arm 1: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 100 mg + JNJ-56136379 250 mg + NA71.6Percentage of participants
Double-blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Arm 2: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 200 mg + Placebo + NA64.6Percentage of participants
Double-blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Arm 3: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 100 mg + Placebo + NA71.0Percentage of participants
Double-blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Arm 4: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 40 mg + Placebo + NA74.2Percentage of participants

Participant flow54

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm 1: JNJ-73763989 100 mg + JNJ-56136379 250 mg + NA95
Overall StudySTARTEDArm 2: JNJ-73763989 200 mg + Placebo + NA96
Overall StudySTARTEDArm 3: JNJ-73763989 100 mg + Placebo + NA93
Overall StudySTARTEDArm 4: JNJ-73763989 40 mg + Placebo + NA94
Overall StudySTARTEDArm 5: Placebo + JNJ-56136379 250 mg + NA48
Overall StudySTARTEDArm 6: Placebo + Placebo + NA45
Overall StudyDouble Blind PhaseArm 1: JNJ-73763989 100 mg + JNJ-56136379 250 mg + NA95
Overall StudyDouble Blind PhaseArm 2: JNJ-73763989 200 mg + Placebo + NA96
Overall StudyDouble Blind PhaseArm 3: JNJ-73763989 100 mg + Placebo + NA93
Overall StudyDouble Blind PhaseArm 4: JNJ-73763989 40 mg + Placebo + NA93

Adverse events8,010

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm 1: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 100 mg + JNJ-56136379 250 mg + NA295
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm 2: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 200 mg + Placebo + NA296
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm 3: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 (100 mg) + Placebo + NA393
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm 4: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 (40 mg) + Placebo + NA393
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm 5: DB Phase: Placebo + JNJ-56136379 250 mg + NA148
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm 6: DB Phase: Placebo + Placebo + NA345
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm 1: Follow up Phase 1: JNJ-73763989 (100 mg) + JNJ-56136379 (250 mg) + NA181
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm 2: Follow up Phase 1: JNJ-73763989 (200mg) + Placebo + NA170
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm 3: Follow up Phase 1: JNJ-73763989 (100 mg) + Placebo + NA171
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm 4: Follow up Phase 1: JNJ-73763989 (40 mg) + Placebo + NA085

Adverse event totals90

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm 1: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 100 mg + JNJ-56136379 250 mg + NA095
Total, all-cause mortalityArm 2: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 200 mg + Placebo + NA096
Total, all-cause mortalityArm 3: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 (100 mg) + Placebo + NA093
Total, all-cause mortalityArm 4: DB Phase: JNJ-73763989 (40 mg) + Placebo + NA093
Total, all-cause mortalityArm 5: DB Phase: Placebo + JNJ-56136379 250 mg + NA048
Total, all-cause mortalityArm 6: DB Phase: Placebo + Placebo + NA045
Total, all-cause mortalityArm 1: Follow up Phase 1: JNJ-73763989 (100 mg) + JNJ-56136379 (250 mg) + NA081
Total, all-cause mortalityArm 2: Follow up Phase 1: JNJ-73763989 (200mg) + Placebo + NA070
Total, all-cause mortalityArm 3: Follow up Phase 1: JNJ-73763989 (100 mg) + Placebo + NA071
Total, all-cause mortalityArm 4: Follow up Phase 1: JNJ-73763989 (40 mg) + Placebo + NA085

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
37442152DERIVEDPubMed
41362713DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03982186

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03982186/registered?page=2