ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03996564

Battlefield Acupuncture for Acute/Subacute Back Pain in the Emergency Department

NCT03996564, Not applicable, Completed, San Antonio Military Medical Center

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Battlefield Acupuncture for Acute/Subacute Back Pain in the Emergency Department. Trials, record NCT03996564. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03996564

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Battlefield Acupuncture for Acute/Subacute Back Pain in the Emergency Department
NCT number
NCT03996564
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
26 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
San Antonio Military Medical Center
Conditions
Low Back Pain, Mechanical
Interventions
Battlefield Acupuncture, Acetaminophen, Diclofenac, Diazepam, Hydrocodone, Ketorolac
First posted
2019-06-25
Last updated
2019-06-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primarytime-response of BFA, and the association with pain level using the Visual Analog scale (0-10 mm) scoring as well as the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) scoringbefore treatment, 30-40 minutes post-treatment, and 48 to 72 hours post-treatment
determine if there is any significant change in pain in the BFA treatment group at specific time points using the Visual Analog scale (0-10 mm) scoring as well as the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) scoring
PrimaryEvaluate the change of pain on Visual Analog scale (0-10mm) scoring with BFA administered in the emergency department for persons presenting with non-pathologic back pain.baseline and at 30-40 minutes post treatment
Using the Visual Analog scale which is a 10mm line, the patient will place a mark on the graph which will be measured to determine if there is any significant difference between the BFA treatment group pain at specific timepoints using the VAS. The lower the score determined on the scale corresponds to a lower pain level for the patient and a higher score corresponds to a higher pain level.
PrimaryEvaluate the change of pain on Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) scoring with BFA administered in the emergency department for persons presenting with non-pathologic back pain.baseline, 30-40 minutes, and 48-72 hours
The Numeric Rating scale which is a scale that is verbally asked to determine the patients pain response on a scale from 0 to 10 determine if there is any significant difference between the BFA treatment group pain at specific timepoints using the NRS. The lower the score determined on the scale corresponds to a lower pain level for the patient and a higher score corresponds to a higher pain level.
Secondarytime-response30-40 minutes after treatment, and between 48-72 hours after discharge
Time response will determine change in pain associated with the Numeric Rating scale (measured 0-10, 0 being least, 10 being most) from baseline, at 30-40 minutes after treatment, and between 48-72 hours after discharge.
SecondaryExamine the functionality score changes at 3 time points using the Back Pain Functional Scalebaseline, at the time the patient is to be discharged from the Emergency Room (0-3 hrs post baseline assessment), and 48-72 hours after discharge
Stratford et al developed the Back Pain Function Scale (BPFS) (scored 0-60 with higher scores showing no difficulty and lower scores showing patient is unable to perform activity) to evaluation functional ability in patients with back pain. The authors are from McMaster University Appalachian Physical Therapy (Georgia) and Virginia Commonwealth University.
SecondaryExplore participant satisfaction of pain control in the BFA treatment group: 1 questionAt discharge from the Emergency Room (0-3 hours post baseline assessment) and between 48-72 hours after discharge1 question regarding overall pain control satisfaction, and 2 specifically addressing those in the acupuncture group
SecondaryThe need for any additional pain medication outside of the treatment protocolrecorded at the 48-72 hours from discharge for the follow up interviewNumber of patients that required any additional pain medications either in the Emergency Room or at home to include over the counter or prescription

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers26

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
1624812BACKGROUNDPubMed
8538981BACKGROUNDPubMed
15345962BACKGROUNDPubMed
15590948BACKGROUNDPubMed
16001610BACKGROUNDPubMed
16192528BACKGROUNDPubMed
17076456BACKGROUNDPubMed
17641561BACKGROUNDPubMed
17641567BACKGROUNDPubMed
19608954BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 26

See all 26 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03996564

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03996564/papers?page=2