ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04005352

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab 6mg Compared to Aflibercept 2 mg in a Treat-to-control Regimen (TALON)

NCT04005352, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2024-01-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab 6mg Compared to Aflibercept 2 mg in a Treat-to-control Regimen (TALON). Trials, record NCT04005352. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04005352

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab 6mg Compared to Aflibercept 2 mg in a Treat-to-control Regimen (TALON)
NCT number
NCT04005352
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
734 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Age-related Macular Degeneration
Interventions
Brolucizumab 6 mg, Aflibercept 2 mg
First posted
2019-07-02
Last updated
2024-10-09
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2019-000716-28
Results first posted
2024-01-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes27

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryDistribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 32 - Study EyeUp to Week 32
No disease activity is defined as no change in visual acuity and no change in other signs of the disease (e.g. Intraretinal Fluid (IRF), Subretinal Fluid (SRF), hemorrhage, leakage, etc.). Treatment interval distribution. Number (%) of subjects at 12/8/4-weeks intervals up to Week 32 for the study eye. If the study treatment is discontinued before Week 16, then the treatment interval is 4 weeks; otherwise. the last interval with no disease activity is used (if there was disease activity, the last interval is shortened by 4 weeks, down to a minimum of 4 weeks). If the duration of the last interval falls within the following ranges of (4-week, 8-week) or (8-week, 12-week) or ≥12-week then the floor value of these ranges was used.
PrimaryAverage Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 32 in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) - Study EyeBaseline, Week 28 and Week 32
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning. Least squares mean estimate - for weeks 28 and 32 combined.
SecondaryDistribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 64 - Study EyeUp to Week 64
No disease activity is defined as no change in visual acuity and no change in other signs of the disease (e.g. IRF, SRF, hemorrhage, leakage, etc.). Treatment interval distribution. The number of subjects at 16/12/8/4-weeks intervals as the last interval with no disease activity. If the study treatment is discontinued before Week 16, then the treatment interval is 4 weeks; otherwise. the last interval with no disease activity is used (if there was disease activity, the last interval is shortened by 4 weeks, down to a minimum of 4 weeks). If the duration of the last interval falls within the following ranges of (4-week, 8-week) or (8-week, 12-week) or (12-weeks, 16-weeks) or ≥16-week then the floor value of these ranges was used.
SecondaryDistribution of the Maximal Intervals With no Disease Activity up to Week 64 - Study EyeUp to Week 64
No disease activity is defined as no change in visual acuity and no change in other signs of the disease (e.g. IRF, SRF, hemorrhage, leakage, etc.). Maximal interval distribution. Number of subjects at 16/12/8/4-weeks intervals as the last interval with no disease activity. If the study treatment is discontinued before Week 16 included, then the treatment interval is 4 weeks; otherwise, the last interval with no disease activity is used (if there was disease activity, the last interval is shortened by 4 weeks, down to a minimum of 4 weeks). If the duration of the maximal interval falls within the following ranges of \[4-weeks, 8-weeks) or \[8-weeks, 12-weeks) or \[12-weeks, 16-weeks\] or ≥16-weeks then the floor value of these ranges is used.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With no Disease Activity - Study EyeWeeks 14 and 16Disease activity assessment as determined by visual acuity and assessment of other signs of the disease (e.g. IRF, SRF, hemorrhage, leakage, etc.).
SecondaryTime From Last Loading Injection to First Visit With No Disease Activity (Weeks) - 75th Percentile - Study EyeUp to Week 64
Intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) were assessed by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) (study eye). Please note that this endpoint can be impacted by the optional disease activity assessment visits and the flexible dosing regimen, in addition to the randomized treatment. Hence, the observed treatment effect may be confounded by the study design artifacts.
SecondaryTime-to-first Dry Retina - Time to the First Visit With no Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) or Subretinal Fluid (SRF) - Study EyeUp to Week 64Intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) were assessed by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) (study eye).
SecondaryAverage Change From Baseline at Week 60 and Week 64 in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) - Study EyeBaseline, Week 60 and Week 64
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning. Least squares mean estimate - for weeks 60 and 64 combined.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Best-corrected Visual Acuity Improvements of ≥ 15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Reached BCVA ≥ 84 Letters up to Week 32/64 Per Treatment Arm - Study EyeBaseline, Week 32, and Week 64
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Best-corrected Visual Acuity ≥ 69 Letters - Study EyeWeek 32 and Week 64
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.

Outcomes27

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYDistribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 32 - Study EyeUp to Week 32Full Analysis Set (Includes participants who were randomized and treated.)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYAverage Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 32 in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) - Study EyeBaseline, Week 28 and Week 32Full Analysis Set - Last observation carried forward (LOCF).Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDistribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 64 - Study EyeUp to Week 64Full Analysis SetParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYDistribution of the Maximal Intervals With no Disease Activity up to Week 64 - Study EyeUp to Week 64Full Analysis SetParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With no Disease Activity - Study EyeWeeks 14 and 16
Full Analysis Set. Note that the number analyzed is reduced because the Week 14 visit was conducted at the investigator's discretion, and because some patients had already stopped treatment by Week 16.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTime From Last Loading Injection to First Visit With No Disease Activity (Weeks) - 75th Percentile - Study EyeUp to Week 64Full Analysis Set - subjects with no important protocol deviations with impactweeksNUMBER
SECONDARYTime-to-first Dry Retina - Time to the First Visit With no Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) or Subretinal Fluid (SRF) - Study EyeUp to Week 64Full Analysis Set - subjects with no important protocol deviations with impactParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYAverage Change From Baseline at Week 60 and Week 64 in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) - Study EyeBaseline, Week 60 and Week 64Full Analysis Set - LOCFScores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Best-corrected Visual Acuity Improvements of ≥ 15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Reached BCVA ≥ 84 Letters up to Week 32/64 Per Treatment Arm - Study EyeBaseline, Week 32, and Week 64Full Analysis Set - LOCFParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Best-corrected Visual Acuity ≥ 69 Letters - Study EyeWeek 32 and Week 64Full Analysis Set - LOCFParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group192

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Distribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 32 - Study EyeBrolucizumab 6 mg12 weeks141Participants
Distribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 32 - Study EyeAflibercept 2 mg12 weeks73Participants
Distribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 32 - Study EyeBrolucizumab 6 mg8 weeks131Participants
Distribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 32 - Study EyeAflibercept 2 mg8 weeks147Participants
Distribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 32 - Study EyeBrolucizumab 6 mg4 weeks94Participants
Distribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 32 - Study EyeAflibercept 2 mg4 weeks148Participants
Average Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 32 in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) - Study EyeBrolucizumab 6 mg5.2Standard Error 0.51Scores on a scale
Average Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 32 in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) - Study EyeAflibercept 2 mg5.1Standard Error 0.51Scores on a scale
Distribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 64 - Study EyeBrolucizumab 6 mg16 Weeks104Participants
Distribution of the Last Interval With no Disease Activity up to Week 64 - Study EyeAflibercept 2 mg16 Weeks45Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBrolucizumab 6 mg366
Overall StudySTARTEDAflibercept 2 mg368
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBrolucizumab 6 mg317
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAflibercept 2 mg307
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBrolucizumab 6 mg49
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAflibercept 2 mg61

Adverse events495

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBrolucizumab 6mg0366
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAflibercept 2mg4368
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAll Patients4734
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersBrolucizumab 6mg6366
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersAflibercept 2mg1368
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersAll Patients7734
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersBrolucizumab 6mg4366
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersAflibercept 2mg4368
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersAll Patients8734
otherCataract - Study EyeEye disordersBrolucizumab 6mg5366

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBrolucizumab 6mg4366
Total, all-cause mortalityAflibercept 2mg2368
Total, all-cause mortalityAll Patients6734
Total, other adverse eventsBrolucizumab 6mg172366
Total, other adverse eventsAflibercept 2mg177368
Total, other adverse eventsAll Patients349734
Total, serious adverse eventsBrolucizumab 6mg58366
Total, serious adverse eventsAflibercept 2mg53368
Total, serious adverse eventsAll Patients111734

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Brolucizumab 6 mg vs Aflibercept 2 mg: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Non-ocular Adverse Events (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm) - Summary Table

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04005352

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04005352/registered?page=2