Trial · NCT04006457
Registered outcomes37
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 20 of 37
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until Follow-up Visit | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study. |
| Primary | Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up Visit | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn. |
| Primary | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40) | Vital signs including blood pressure included systolic blood pressure (SBP) \[Millimeters of mercury, mmHg\]) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse rate \[beats per minute (bpm)\] were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Criteria for vital sign abnormalities included: SBP\<90mmHg, DBP\<50 mmHg and pulse rate\<40mmHg. |
| Primary | Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Values Until Follow-up Visit | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40) | Criteria for laboratory abnormalities included:Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes (\<0.8\*LLN); Ery. Volume, Hemoglobin,Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.5\*LLN;Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes (\>1.2\*ULN), Prothrombin Time(\>1.1\*ULN).Clinical Chemistry: Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin (1.5\*ULN), Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase (\>3.0\*ULN); Albumin, Urate (\<0.8\*LLN and \>1.2\*ULN; Urea Nitrogen,Creatinine Cholesterol \>1.3\*ULN; Cholesterol \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*LLN, Triglycerides,Potassium,Calcium \< 0.9x LLN \& \> 1.1x ULN; Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite \>=1; Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes \>=20; Epithelial Cells\>=6, Hyaline Cast\>1; Bacteria\>20. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria is included. |
| Primary | Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Tetanus Booster Response | Month 1 | Booster response to tetanus toxoid was defined as: \>=4-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody concentration at Month 1 if the pre-vaccination concentration was \<=2.7 International Units per milliliter (IU/mL); OR \>=2-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid IgG antibody concentration if the pre-vaccination concentration was \>2.7 IU/mL. Two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until End of Study | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until End of Study | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs Until End of Study | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study | Vital signs including blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure \[Millimeters of mercury, mmHg\]) and pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]) were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Until End of Study | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study | Following laboratory parameters were assessed: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes Erythrocyte (ery.) corpuscular volume, Ery. Mean Corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Prothrombin Time, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase; Albumin, Urate; Urea Nitrogen, Creatinine, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Potassium, Calcium, Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite, Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes; Epithelial Cells, Hyaline Cast, Bacteria. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score \<= 10 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score \<=20 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing division of scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score is sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into 4 quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss). SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), lower score= less hair loss. Baseline (Roll-over participants: Day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015; De novo participants: Day 1 from Study B7981032). |
| Secondary | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). An Overall SALT 75 response was a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in SALT score. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score= SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), where lower score=less hair loss. SALT 75 response= 75% or greater reduction from baseline in AA SALT score. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | At Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | EBA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyebrow hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0= no eyebrow, 1=minimal eyebrow, 2=moderate eyebrow and 3= normal eyebrow. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyebrow hair. 95% CI was based on normal approximation. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | At Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | ELA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyelash hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0=no eyelash, 1=minimal eyelash, 2=moderate eyelash and 3=normal eyelash. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyelash hair. |
| Secondary | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | PGI-C is a self-administered single item questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. Participants were required to select their response on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (greatly worsened), 2=moderately worsened, 3=slightly worsened, 4=not changed, 5= slightly improved, 6=moderately improved, 7 (greatly improved). 95% CI was based on normal approximation. |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04006457/registered