ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04037891

Topical rVA576 for Treatment of Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis

NCT04037891, Phase 1, Phase 2, Terminated, AKARI Therapeutics; results first posted 2025-02-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Topical rVA576 for Treatment of Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis. Trials, record NCT04037891. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04037891

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Topical rVA576 for Treatment of Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis
NCT number
NCT04037891
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
12 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AKARI Therapeutics
Conditions
Keratoconjunctivitis, Atopic, Keratoconjunctivitis, Vernal, Conjunctivitis, Allergic
Interventions
rVA576, Placebo, rVA576
First posted
2019-07-30
Last updated
2025-04-10
Results first posted
2025-02-27
Limitations and caveats
1. Early termination due to the Covid-19 pandemic.~2. Uneven distribution of patients between rVA576 and placebo in Part 2, due to incorrect storage and impossibility of manufacturing a new batch, leading to replacement by the only available randomized and labelled product and resulting in patients being allocated to placebo. With a 6 to 3 distribution of completed patients it is difficult to draw meaningful statistical conclusions or detect trends. The safety data were not compromised.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryIncidence of Ocular TEAE56 daysIncidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) during the treatment period which have occurred during the 56 days following randomisation.
SecondaryPost-instillation ComfortDay 1 to 56
Graded on patient diary cards at the intervals Day 1-14, 15-28, 29-42 and 43-56. Eye comfort scoring: 0 - Perfectly comfortable 1. \- Slight discomfort. Some burning, itching or stinging for up to half a minute after using the eye drop, solution but the discomfort improves without treatment. 2. \- Moderate discomfort. Burning, itching or stinging lasts for 0.5 minute or longer but improves without treatment. 3. \- Severe discomfort. Burning, itching or stinging last for at least 0.5 minute and requires washing the eyes to relieve it. 4. \- Unbearable burning itching or stinging. So severe that you cannot continue treatment. The 14 day average score for each interval have been calculated for each patient (possible range of 0 to 40). Classifications were assigned using the average total score at each two week period as follows: \< 10 = Comfortable/Acceptable, 10 - 19 = Moderately Uncomfortable, 20 - 29 = Very Uncomfortable, \>= 30 = Severely/Unacceptably Uncomfortable.
SecondaryVisual AcuityDay 1 to 56
Visual acuity for the worst eye over time by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts comparison from Day 1 to Day 56 In ETDRS charts, zero indicates standard vision, positive values indicates poor vision, and negative values indicates good vision.
SecondaryClinical ScoresDay 1 to 56
Change from Day 1 in composite clinical scores at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56, for the eye judged as worst affected at each visit. Score calculated from symptom and sign sub-components. AKC/VKC: symptom sub-component consisted of itch, tearing, discomfort, discharge, and photophobia, and the sign component consisted of bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, tarsal conjunctival papillary hypertrophy, punctate keratitis, neovascularization of cornea, cicatrizing conjunctivitis, blepharitis. SAC/PAC: symptom sub-component consisted itch, tearing, discomfort, and photophobia, and the sign sub-component consisted of upper tarsal conjunctival hyperaemia, upper bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, chemosis, upper tarsal conjunctival papillae, blepharitis. For each sign/symptom a score of 0 - 3 is awarded (0=absence of a sign/symptom; an increase in score indicates increase in severity). These scores are summed at the end of the exam to give the composite score. Range:0 to 33 (AKC/VKC) or 27 (SAC/PAC).
SecondaryMMP-9 PositiveDay 1 to 56
Percentage of patients with Matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP-9) positive levels at Days 1, 28, and 56. MMP-9 is a is a nonspecific inflammatory marker. Detection was made using the Inflammadry® device. This device gives a binary (positive/negative) result.
SecondaryTear Film Break up TimeChange from Day 1 at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56
Change from Day 1 in Tear film break up time (TBUT) at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56. TBUT data was available for one eye only. Tear breakup time (TBUT) is a clinical test used to assess for evaporative dry eye disease. To measure TBUT, fluorescein is instilled into the patient's tear film and the patient is asked not to blink while the tear film is observed under a broad beam of cobalt blue illumination. The TBUT is recorded as the number of seconds that elapse between the last blink and the appearance of the first dry spot in the tear film. A TBUT under 10 seconds is considered abnormal.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYIncidence of Ocular TEAE56 daysParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPost-instillation ComfortDay 1 to 56
The Comfort score data was not available for one patient in the nomacopan group Part 2, and in one patient in Part 1, after Day 14, both due to withdrawal.~Because only two patients in the Part 2 nomacopan group had data to assess comfort score, it is not meaningful to compare the nomacopan and placebo groups, and so further analysis was not performed.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYVisual AcuityDay 1 to 56Only one patient in the nomacopan group in Part 2 had data to assess this score. It is not meaningful to compare the nomacopan and placebo groups, and so further analysis was not performed.Number of ETDRS lettersMEAN
SECONDARYClinical ScoresDay 1 to 56
Because only two patients in the Part 2 nomacopan group had data to assess this score, it is not meaningful to compare the nomacopan and placebo groups, and so further analysis was not performed.~Note there were two patients on Placebo with SAC; therefore, scored on a different scale compared to patients with AKC or VKC. For the purposes of the outcome measure, the SAC and AKC/VKC scores were combined to derive a single value across all participants.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMMP-9 PositiveDay 1 to 56There were too few patients to make a meaningful interpretation.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTear Film Break up TimeChange from Day 1 at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56Patient numbers within each treatment group are too small to make meaningful comparisons, and so no further analysis was performed.secondsMEAN

Results by group111

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Incidence of Ocular TEAErVA576, Open-label Period3Participants
Incidence of Ocular TEAErVA576, Double-blind Period2Participants
Incidence of Ocular TEAEPlacebo3Participants
Post-instillation ComfortrVA576, Open-label PeriodDay 1 to 14 / Comfortable/Acceptable3Participants
Post-instillation ComfortrVA576, Double-blind PeriodDay 1 to 14 / Comfortable/Acceptable1Participants
Post-instillation ComfortPlaceboDay 1 to 14 / Comfortable/Acceptable4Participants
Post-instillation ComfortrVA576, Open-label PeriodDay 1 to 14 / Moderately Uncomfortable0Participants
Post-instillation ComfortrVA576, Double-blind PeriodDay 1 to 14 / Moderately Uncomfortable1Participants
Post-instillation ComfortPlaceboDay 1 to 14 / Moderately Uncomfortable2Participants
Post-instillation ComfortrVA576, Open-label PeriodDays 15 to 28 / Comfortable/Acceptable2Participants

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Open-label PeriodSTARTEDrVA576, Open-label Period (8 Weeks)3
Open-label PeriodSTARTEDrVA576, Double-blind Period (8 Weeks)0
Open-label PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo (8 Weeks)0
Open-label PeriodCOMPLETEDrVA576, Open-label Period (8 Weeks)2
Open-label PeriodCOMPLETEDrVA576, Double-blind Period (8 Weeks)0
Open-label PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo (8 Weeks)0
Open-label PeriodNOT COMPLETEDrVA576, Open-label Period (8 Weeks)1
Open-label PeriodNOT COMPLETEDrVA576, Double-blind Period (8 Weeks)0
Open-label PeriodNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo (8 Weeks)0
Randomized, Double-blind PeriodSTARTEDrVA576, Open-label Period (8 Weeks)0

Adverse events36

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAtopic keratoconjunctivitisEye disordersrVA576, Open-label Period131
otherAtopic keratoconjunctivitisEye disordersrVA576, Double-blind Period132
otherAtopic keratoconjunctivitisEye disordersPlacebo060
otherKeratitisEye disordersrVA576, Open-label Period030
otherKeratitisEye disordersrVA576, Double-blind Period131
otherKeratitisEye disordersPlacebo161
otherOcular hyperaemiaEye disordersrVA576, Open-label Period232
otherOcular hyperaemiaEye disordersrVA576, Double-blind Period030
otherOcular hyperaemiaEye disordersPlacebo060
otherConjunctival hyperaemiaEye disordersrVA576, Open-label Period030

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityrVA576, Open-label Period03
Total, all-cause mortalityrVA576, Double-blind Period03
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo06
Total, other adverse eventsrVA576, Open-label Period33
Total, other adverse eventsrVA576, Double-blind Period23
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo36
Total, serious adverse eventsrVA576, Open-label Period03
Total, serious adverse eventsrVA576, Double-blind Period03
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo06

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04037891

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04037891/results?page=2