ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04040322

Intravenous Iloprost in Subjects With Symptomatic Raynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic Sclerosis (Phase 3)

NCT04040322, Phase 3, Completed, Civi Biopharma, Inc.; results first posted 2025-05-25

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intravenous Iloprost in Subjects With Symptomatic Raynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic Sclerosis (Phase 3). Trials, record NCT04040322. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04040322

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Intravenous Iloprost in Subjects With Symptomatic Raynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic Sclerosis (Phase 3)
NCT number
NCT04040322
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
198 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Civi Biopharma, Inc.
Conditions
Raynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic Sclerosis
Interventions
Placebo IV infusion, Iloprost Injection, for intravenous use
First posted
2019-07-31
Last updated
2025-05-25
Results first posted
2025-05-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Frequency of Symptomatic RP AttacksFrom baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end ofthe efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).
The primary efficacy parameter is the change in the weekly frequency of symptomatic RP attacks from baseline. The baseline weekly frequency of symptomatic RP attacks was defined as the average number of weekly symptomatic RP attacks that occurred during the 10- to 25-day baseline ePRO diary completion period. The double-blind endpoint weekly frequency of symptomatic RP attacks was defined as the average number of weekly symptomatic RP attacks that occurred during Days 8 to 21, inclusive
SecondaryChange in Severity of RP Attack SymptomsFrom baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).
Change in overall severity of RP attack symptoms as registered in electronic diary. It was measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) as follows: 0 = no pain/numbness/tingling/discomfort, 1 to 3 = mild pain/numbness/tingling/discomfort, 4 to 6 = moderate pain/numbness/tingling/discomfort, and 7 to 10 = severe pain/numbness/tingling/discomfort. The severity of the symptoms (pain, numbness, discomfort or tingling) was rated by the patient in the electronic diary (ePRO). The symptom with the worst average baseline value for each patient was compared to the average severity rate of that symptom which occurred during Days 8 to 21 of the treatment period. If more than 1 symptom had the same value, the symptom used for analysis was based on the following order of rank: pain\>numbness\>tingling\>discomfort.
SecondaryWeekly Total Duration of Symptomatic RP Attacks.From baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).
The weekly duration is calculated as the average duration of a systematic RP attack times weekly frequency, as registered in electronic diary. The baseline weekly duration was calculated as the average duration of a systematic RP attack times weekly frequency during the 10- to 25-day baseline electronic diary completion period. The end of the efficacy follow-up weekly duration of symptomatic RP attacks is calculated as the average duration of a systematic RP attack times weekly frequency during Days 8 to 21, inclusive.
SecondaryPercentage of RespondersFrom baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).
The responders are defined as participants that have at least 50% reduction in weekly total duration of symptomatic RP attacks and at least 50% reduction in overall severity from baseline. Duration of symptomatic RP attacks and severity of attacks are obtained from electronic diary.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Frequency of Symptomatic RP AttacksFrom baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end ofthe efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).The Intention-To-Treat (ITT) Population was defined as all randomized patients who initiated (received) study drug infusion.Number of RP attacks per weekLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Severity of RP Attack SymptomsFrom baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).The ITT-To-Treat (ITT) population, defined as all randomized patients who initiated (received) study drug infusion.Score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYWeekly Total Duration of Symptomatic RP Attacks.From baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).MinutesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of RespondersFrom baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Frequency of Symptomatic RP AttacksPlacebo-11.4795% Confidence Interval -13.69 to -9.25Number of RP attacks per week
Change in Frequency of Symptomatic RP AttacksIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use-12.7395% Confidence Interval -14.92 to -10.55Number of RP attacks per week
Change in Severity of RP Attack SymptomsPlacebo-2.1395% Confidence Interval -2.51 to -1.75Score on a scale
Change in Severity of RP Attack SymptomsIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use-2.1995% Confidence Interval -2.57 to -1.82Score on a scale
Weekly Total Duration of Symptomatic RP Attacks.Placebo-321.0495% Confidence Interval -385.03 to -257.05Minutes
Weekly Total Duration of Symptomatic RP Attacks.Iloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use-326.4895% Confidence Interval -389.53 to -263.44Minutes
Percentage of RespondersPlacebo33Participants
Percentage of RespondersIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use33Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo97
Overall StudySTARTEDIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use99
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo97
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use99
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use0

Adverse events42

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo389782
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use8599271
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersPlacebo109714
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use109916
otherHead discomfortNervous system disordersPlacebo59711
otherHead discomfortNervous system disordersIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use2995
otherParaesthesiaNervous system disordersPlacebo5978
otherParaesthesiaNervous system disordersIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use1991
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo159730
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use5799104

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo097
Total, all-cause mortalityIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use099
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo7897
Total, other adverse eventsIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use9999
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo097
Total, serious adverse eventsIloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use199

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Iloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use vs Placebo: Percentage of RespondersTrial comparisons
Iloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Iloprost Injection, for Intravenous Use vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04040322

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04040322/events?page=2