ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04052425

Outcomes24

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline in the Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI75) Score at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
Intent-to-Treat Population: all randomized participants. Treatment groups for this population were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization. Missing F-VASI scores were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Fully Conditional Specification. The multiple imputation method used treatment and observed stratification factors as predicators.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI50) Score at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Missing F-VASI scores were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Fully Conditional Specification. The multiple imputation method used treatment and observed stratification factors as predicators.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline in the Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI90) Score at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Missing F-VASI scores were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Fully Conditional Specification. The multiple imputation method used treatment and observed stratification factors as predicators.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI50) Score at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Missing T-VASI scores were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Fully Conditional Specification. The multiple imputation method used treatment and observed stratification factors as predicators.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) of 4 or 5 at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Missing VNS scores were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Fully Conditional Specification. The multiple imputation method used treatment and observed stratification factors as predicators.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Facial Body Surface Area (F-BSA) at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Missing F-BSA scores were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Fully Conditional Specification. The multiple imputation method used treatment and observed stratification factors as predicators.
percentage changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Double-Blind Periodfrom the time of Informed Consent Form signing until at least 30 days after the last application of study drug (up to Week 24)
Safety Population: all participants who applied ruxolitinib cream or vehicle cream at least once. Treatment groups for this population were determined according to the actual treatment the participant applied on Day 1.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Treatment-Extension Periodfrom the completion of the Week 24 assessments until at least 30 days after the last application of study drug (up to Week 52 + 30 days)Treatment-Extension (TE) Evaluable Population: all participants who applied ruxolitinib cream at least once in the TE PeriodParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 25% Improvement in the Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI25) Score at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Missing F-VASI scores were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Fully Conditional Specification. The multiple imputation method used treatment and observed stratification factors as predicators.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ %25, ≥ %50, ≥ 75%, and ≥ 90% Improvement in the Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI25/50/75/90) Score at Week 52Baseline; Week 52ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. MMRM model: (Response Variable = Treatment + Stratification Factors \[Skin Type Fitzpatrick Scale Type I and II versus Type III, IV, V, and VI, Region North America/Europe\] + Visit + Treatment\*Visit).
percentage changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI at Week 52Baseline; Week 52ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA at Week 52Baseline; Week 52ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. MMRM model: (Response Variable = Treatment + Stratification Factors \[Skin Type Fitzpatrick scale Type I and II vs Type III, IV, V, and VI, Region North America/Europe\] + Visit + Treatment\*Visit).
percentage changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI at Week 52Baseline; Week 52ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. MMRM model: (Response Variable = Treatment + Stratification Factors \[Skin Type Fitzpatrick scale Type I and II vs Type III, IV, V, and VI, Region North America/Europe\] + Visit + Treatment\*Visit).
percentage changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA at Week 52Baseline; Week 52ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 25%, ≥ 75%, and ≥ 90% Improvement in the Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI25/75/90) Score at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Missing T-VASI scores were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Fully Conditional Specification. The multiple imputation method used treatment and observed stratification factors as predicators.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 25%, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and ≥ 90% Improvement in the Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI25/50/75/90) Score at Week 52Baseline; Week 52ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants in Each Category of VNS During the Treatment Period (Double-Blind and Treatment-Extension Periods)Baseline; Week 24 and Week 52ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04052425/outcomes