ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04053699

Bleeding Incidence in VWD Patients Undergoing On-Demand Treatment

NCT04053699, Completed, Octapharma; results first posted 2023-12-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Bleeding Incidence in VWD Patients Undergoing On-Demand Treatment. Trials, record NCT04053699. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04053699

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Bleeding Incidence in VWD Patients Undergoing On-Demand Treatment
NCT number
NCT04053699
Status
Completed
Enrollment
56 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Octapharma
Conditions
Von Willebrand Diseases
Interventions
Von Willebrand Factor-Containing Product
First posted
2019-08-12
Last updated
2023-12-07
Results first posted
2023-12-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTotal Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR)Screening through study completion (6 months)
The total annualized bleeding rate (TABR) will be calculated as the total number of spontaneous bleeds, traumatic BEs, and other BEs occurring in the time period between the start of data collection for each patient and the Study Completion Visit, divided by the duration (in years) between the start of data collection and the Study Completion Visit. Surgery periods, and BEs occurring within these surgery periods, will be excluded from the calculation of TABR.
SecondarySpontaneous Annualized Bleeding Rate (SABR)Screening through study completion (6 months)Spontaneous annualized bleeding rate (SABR), calculated in analogy with TABR. This includes all bleeding episodes that occurred spontaneously.
SecondaryConsumption of the VWF-containing ProductScreening through study completion (6 months)Data on the consumption of the VWF-containing product (VWF/FVIII IU/kg per month per patient) used for routine on-demand treatment
SecondaryNumber of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleScreening through study completion (6 months)
The efficacy assessment of bleeding episodes at the end of a BE was evaluated on a 4 point scale by the patient/legal guardian (together with the Investigator in case of on-site treatment) including the four items 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none.' The assessment was excellent when bleeding was completely stopped within 3 days in case of minor bleed, within 7 days in case of major bleed, and within 10 days in case of gastrointestinal bleed; Good when bleeding was completely stopped, but time and/or dose slightly exceeded expectations ; Moderate when bleeding could be stopped only by significantly exceeding time and/or dose expectations; and None when bleeding could be stopped only by using other VWF-containing products.
SecondaryNumber of Surgery With Successful/Unsuccessful Efficacy AssessmentFrom start of surgery until end of post-operative period (within 8 days after surgery)
Effectiveness of VWF-containing product in surgical prophylaxis based on the proportion of surgeries successfully treated. Overall treatment efficacy will be assessed at the end of the postoperative period by the treating physician using predefined criteria of 'Excellent', 'Good', 'Moderate/Poor' or 'None'.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)At screening visit
QoL assessment based on the results from the PROMIS-29 survey to monitor and evaluate the physical, mental, and social health in all patients, using a scale of a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with higher scores representing a better outcome. The survey covers seven domains from the most relevant areas of self-reported health (depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance and ability to participate in social roles and activities) for the majority of people with chronic illness. PROMIS scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in a referent population. Full details of cut off points for each domain can be found here: https://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis/promis-score-cut-points
SecondaryQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using a 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)At screening visit
QoL assessment based on the results from the SF-36v2 questionnaire to measure functional health and well-being in patients ≥16 years. SF-36v2 ranks 8 different domains using a scale standardized with a scoring algorithm to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100.The eight health domains include physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health problems (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE) and general mental health (MH). Higher scores indicate better health status, and a mean score of 50 has been articulated as a normative value for all scales.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using a 10-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-10)At screening
QoL assessment based on the results from a SF-10 parent-completed questionnaire for patients ≥5.5 and \<16 years of age, in order to score physical and psychosocial health. SF-10 uses norm-based scoring where scales have a standardized mean value of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
SecondaryJoint Health Status Assessed Using Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS)At screening
Joint health status will be assessed using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), which has been specifically validated for the assessment of the clinical outcome in VWD. HJHS evaluates six index joints to produce a score between 0-124. Higher scores indicate worse joint health.
SecondaryMenstrual Bleeding Assessed Using Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) ScoreScreening through study completion (6 months)
Bleeding information from each menstrual period while in this study will be collected using the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC). The PBAC will be provided to all female patients of child-bearing potential. The data documented in the PBAC and the investigator-calculated final score will be recorded in the eCRF. The PBAC records pad and tampon use (as either light \[1 point\], medium \[5 points\], or heavy \[10 points\] flow), clots (small \[1 point\] or large \[5 points\]), and flooding episodes (1 point each) which can be recorded as many times as necessary any day of the month. The PBAC is scored from 0 (no bleeding) onwards, with a score of \>100 defining abnormal coagulation and heavy menstrual bleeding (corresponds to \>80ml of blood loss per menstrual cycle).

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYTotal Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR)Screening through study completion (6 months)Bleeding events per yearMEAN
SECONDARYSpontaneous Annualized Bleeding Rate (SABR)Screening through study completion (6 months)Bleeding events per yearMEAN
SECONDARYConsumption of the VWF-containing ProductScreening through study completion (6 months)Four subjects were not treated with VCP, for two subjects the dose administered is unknown for all infusionsIUs per kg per month per patientMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleScreening through study completion (6 months)39 patients who received VWF-containing product in the treatment of BEsNumber of Bleeding EpisodesNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Surgery With Successful/Unsuccessful Efficacy AssessmentFrom start of surgery until end of post-operative period (within 8 days after surgery)6 patients had 7 surgeries that were treated with VWFSurgeriesNUMBER
SECONDARYQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)At screening visitT-ScoresMEAN
SECONDARYQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using a 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)At screening visit31 patients complete SF-36 questionnaireUnits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using a 10-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-10)At screening25 subjects completed SF-10 questionnaireUnits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYJoint Health Status Assessed Using Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS)At screening37 patients from 42 patients in the PP set completed HJHSUnits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMenstrual Bleeding Assessed Using Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) ScoreScreening through study completion (6 months)All subjects of child bearing potential who experienced menstrual cycleUnits on a scaleMEAN

Results by group39

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Total Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR)Patients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product29.13Standard Deviation 22.925Bleeding events per year
Spontaneous Annualized Bleeding Rate (SABR)Patients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product21.19Standard Deviation 19.337Bleeding events per year
Consumption of the VWF-containing ProductPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product77.94Standard Deviation 67.898IUs per kg per month per patient
Number of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScalePatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing ProductExcellent450Number of Bleeding Episodes
Number of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScalePatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing ProductGood6Number of Bleeding Episodes
Number of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScalePatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing ProductModerate1Number of Bleeding Episodes
Number of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScalePatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing ProductNone0Number of Bleeding Episodes
Number of Surgery With Successful/Unsuccessful Efficacy AssessmentPatients Undergoing Treatment With a VWF-containing Product for a Surgical ProcedureExcellent7Surgeries
Number of Surgery With Successful/Unsuccessful Efficacy AssessmentPatients Undergoing Treatment With a VWF-containing Product for a Surgical ProcedureGood0Surgeries
Number of Surgery With Successful/Unsuccessful Efficacy AssessmentPatients Undergoing Treatment With a VWF-containing Product for a Surgical ProcedureModerate0Surgeries

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Full Analysis SetSTARTEDPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product56
Full Analysis SetCOMPLETEDPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product51
Full Analysis SetNOT COMPLETEDPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product5
Per Protocol SetSTARTEDPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product42
Per Protocol SetCOMPLETEDPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product42
Per Protocol SetNOT COMPLETEDPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPatients Undergoing Treatment With a VWF-containing Product051
Total, other adverse eventsPatients Undergoing Treatment With a VWF-containing Product051
Total, serious adverse eventsPatients Undergoing Treatment With a VWF-containing Product051

Papers8

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
8052974BACKGROUNDPubMed
19226411BACKGROUNDPubMed
19474451BACKGROUNDPubMed
22681182BACKGROUNDPubMed
23633542BACKGROUNDPubMed
23672744BACKGROUNDPubMed
29569016BACKGROUNDPubMed
38237075DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04053699

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04053699/results?page=2